Ever
since September 2013, the day Secretary of State John Kerry signed
the United Nations Small Arms Treaty, I have been bothered by the complete
disingenuous concern he presented and outright lies he told to those gathered
to witness the signing, and the American people. Here's the video of the
signing and his remarks.
The first thing
I thought of was that this is a former senator who is signing a three inch
document, which I'm sure he has never read. This is the disingenuous part of
what he is doing.
Second,
in discussing what the treaty is not, he declares "This treaty will not
diminish anyone's freedom. In fact, the treaty recognizes the freedom of both
individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legitimate
purposes. Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that
is inconsistent with the rights of Americans … to be able to exercise their
guaranteed rights under our constitution."
I would have to
ask him for the specific citation on the specific page for how he can claim
these things. I'm sure he wouldn't be able to do it.
However, in
January, William F. Jasper wrote at The New American: The UN Arms Trade Treaty was written
in secret by the Obama/Hillary Clinton State Department, along with Russia,
China, France and Britain. Not exactly a lineup of champions of liberty. What
does it actually say?
Article
2 defines the conventional arms covered, which include battle tanks,
artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles —
and "small arms and light weapons."
Article
3 of the treaty places UN prohibitions on "ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms
covered under Article 2."
Article
4 puts all "parts and components" of weapons within the scheme.
Several
places in the treaty text, including Article 5, require all countries to
"establish and maintain a national control system, including a national control list." Moreover, it declares,
"Each State Party is encouraged to apply the provisions of this Treaty to
the broadest range of conventional arms."
Article
5, Section 4 says each State Party "shall provide its national control list to the Secretariat, which shall
make it available to other States Parties." Which means our federal
government will provide the guns and ammo registration list to the UN, which will provide it
to Russia, China, Cuba — any and every State Party that wants it.
Do you get
that? There's a national control list. We might reference it as a national gun
registration list. This will not only be provided to the federal government,
something they have been given no authority over, but will also be provided to our enemies abroad, including
the United Nations (Yes, friends, I do not consider the UN to be the friend of
the United States).
Kerry has
insisted that this treaty is about "keeping weapons out of the hands of
terrorists and rogue actors."
"This is
about reducing the risk of international transfers of conventional arms that
will be used to carry out the world's worst crimes," Kerry added.
"This is about keeping Americans safe and keeping America strong. And this
is about promoting international peace and global security."
Ask yourself
this question, "Do
you believe John
Kerry?" Furthermore, do you believe
Barack Obama after
all his lies? How about Hillary
Clinton?
If you are
among those who want to support the Obama administration at every turn, I ask
you, if this is about keeping weapons out of the hands of terrorists and rogue
actors, why has the Obama administration funneled money and weapons to our enemies
abroad? Let me ask you an even more
disturbing question, in the Obama administration, who is considered
terrorists? Who are the rogue
actors? Any answers will have to deal
with the documentation that this
administration has put out and the results are that the terrorists are patriotic
Americans, which can only mean one thing:
They are after
your guns.
Finally, don't
forget that the push is on for microstamping
of ammunition (recall Article 3 above). Despite
their claims, they are looking to control the flow of ammunition.
For more on what this has looked like in history, I highly
recommend Stephen P. Halbrook's excellent work Gun
Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and "Enemies of the
State."
http://eaglerising.com/13558/john-kerry-lied-un-wants-take-guns/
No comments:
Post a Comment