<http://www.activistpost.com/2013/07/agenda-21-chapter-8-final-coup.html>
If you think the economy is simply going to collapse, think
again. The bankers, the corporations, and the United Nations have got ecosystem
accounting ready to rock and roll, and it’s set to change everything….
… the plan is brilliant. You reduce the number from 7+
billion by at least 33% without firing one shot. You simply privatize all
natural resources and then price access so that the bottom third of the globe’s
population cannot afford it. And so, they die; it will be the biggest die-off
of the Anthropocene epoch. From Papua New Guinea to Croatia, from Bolivia to
Ghana, from Canada to Central America, from Scotland to Nigeria, from Australia
to America, forests, water rights, mineral rights, arable land, national parks,
and much more is being privatized with the usual outcomes: degradation,
displacement of indigenous populations, higher costs, lack of access to necessary
resources — starvation, death, social unrest and rebellion… ( <http://kulturcritic.wordpress.com/posts/avalanche-natural-capital-and-the-real-end-game/> ‘Natural Capital and the Real End Game’, Sandy Krolick)
There aren’t enough people talking about this. It casts a
whole new light on the TPP, on the reasons for war, possible near-term changes
to corporation tax, and economic failure in general, and boggles the mind when
it comes to geoengineering. Whilst we can only speculate on these connections,
one thing’s for sure - monocultures for biomass-products, GMOs, vaccines,
pharmaceuticals, and nuclear energy will play a huge role, as they are now
deemed to be renewable and/or socially responsible.
A circular economy which controls production and consumption
is the ultimate aim, and this entails deep surveillance and prescriptive living
for what will be called a steady-state
system. <http://www.activistpost.com/2013/06/agenda-21-steady-state-illusion.html>
The system is being implemented by measuring the new capital
assets, which are created by pricing people, nature. From these new concepts,
alternative currencies are forming – we’ve already got carbon credits, and
social credits, and the Club of Rome (and CoR member, Bernard Lietaer), for
instance, have proposed Wellness Tokens. George Soros is one of the many New
Economists who are promoting community currencies.
It’s time to open our eyes to all Agenda 21 entails: there’s
a lot more to it than most activists think. The communitarian ideals of smart
growth and sustainable development are but one part of a much bigger movement
aiming for global ‘sustainability’ by privatizing the commons. This is achieved
by measuring and pricing what are called ‘ecosystem services’, or the benefits
accrued from the earth, and from people. It involves putting monetary values on
aspects of nature, and the ‘services’ it provides (such as pollination), as
well as pricing the productivity and overall conformity of human beings (see
the U.N. plan to increase Global Happiness).
World Bank and the OECD are just two of the globalists which
have perfected the ways of pricing nature, and human well-being. The next step
is for corporations and governments to incorporate these prices into their
financial accounts, as mandated by chapter 8 of Agenda 21. This goes under
various names; the term used for the masses is ‘going beyond GDP’, but more
formally, the process is known as ‘integrated reporting’. Rather than just add
up the usual profits and losses, they have to factor in new kinds of assets and
liabilities, i.e. all the positive and negative effects the companies have,
upon the earth, and upon people.
Apart from the usual built capital, i.e. goods and
infrastructure, that normally make up the accounts of a company, and which are
being restricted due to the fear of scarcity, four new types of
self-perpetuating capital are now required to be priced, and accounted for.
This new system of accountancy has been advanced for many years, and the
International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) has devised a framework which
is to be implemented globally.
Specifically, there are five alternative forms of capital
considered in the framework: manufactured capital accounts for machines the
organisation uses to produce its goods or services; natural capital such as
air, water and land; human capital covering not only people’s skills and
experience, but also motivations or rewards to innovate; intellectual capital
taking in the intangibles providing competitive advantage; and social capital –
defined as the community stakeholders which “enhance individual and collective
wellbeing”, which supports the business model.
<http://www.itbdigital.com/opinion/2013/06/14/capital-ideas-afloat-in-integrated-reporting/>
The process of ecosystem accounting is generally made up of
well-intentioned environmentalists, but led and paid for by trans-national corporations <http://www.wbcsd.org/about/members/members-list-region.aspx>
(TNCs), including Monsanto, Syngenta, Novartis, BP, Shell,
Alcoa, General Motors, and Coca-Cola. <http://usbcsd.org/2005/11/27/members-and-colleagues/>
It’s unlikely that these corporations would be considered at
all ‘sustainable’ by the environmentalists they are funding. Several
corporations, such as Bayer, have also partnered with the U.N. to advance the
protocol of Agenda 21.
<http://activistpost.net/johnsonmotor.html>
Since the inception of the protocol, at the Earth Summit in
1992, unsustainable businesses have been busy greening themselves. In the '90s,
corporate governance became the hot topic, leading to the promotion of
‘business ethics’, and seeding the idea that corporations ‘care’ about the
consequences of their actions. Small changes were made to how companies were
run, so that they could promote themselves as ‘doing the right thing’. All of
the top companies now have a team who deal with the image of the firm in terms
of its ‘corporate social responsibility’ (CSR). Although the focus has been on
carbon-reduction, the social aspect has become increasingly hyped. Being
‘socially responsible’ is said to mean showing consideration for the well-being
of all shareholders (i.e. the people you interact with, or all those affected
by the operations of a business) and usually manifests as donating to social
causes, or getting company employees to do volunteer work for a charity.
There has been a concurrent rise in social investment, such
that philanthro-capitalism is now mainstream. The City of London Corporation
promotes itself as conforming to the green and caring new world order in much
the same way as the other major players:
<http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/about-the-city/working-with-and-for-others/community/Documents/city-of-london-and-big-society.pdf>
The City Corporation has been active in the "Social
Action" area for many years. We call this activity "Supporting
Society". We already have a proud record of promoting volunteering,
environmental management, philanthropy and other forms of social responsibility
such as local recruitment and responsible procurement to City businesses,
workers, residents and our own staff.
Commenting on the rise of social investment, <http://www.bigsocietycapital.com/sites/default/files/pdf/tax%20relief.pdf>
Mark Boleat, Policy Chairman at the City of London
Corporation, noted there is now a “fast-increasing demand for risk and growth
capital”, and recommends applying tax reliefs to social investment. Earlier
this year, he said:
A recent report by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) found
that demand in the social investment market in England could reach £1bn by
2016, five times what it is today…… the demand for capital in the social sector
could grow at a rate of 38% per annum.
Since the Fortune 500 gave birth to, and raised, their
corporate images to the new green standard, there have been many changes to
company law around the world to enforce corporate ‘commitments’ to being
carbon-neutral, and socially responsible. There has also been a huge increase
in businesses which help both the public and the private sector to achieve
these commitments, such that now the ‘sustainability industry’ is booming. Over
the years, then, it has become ‘de rigour’ to try to be green.
The concept of ‘sustainable development’ has taken on many
layers of meaning, and has become so normalised, that practitioners who use the
term have never even heard of Agenda 21. Town planners laugh in the faces of
opponents of the agenda, because they believe strongly in what they do. After
all, the science is settled - most of the world has already been ‘delphied’,
having been besieged with visioning by the media for many years. Think –
‘icecaps melting’ and ‘cute polar bears’. So most people accept the sustainability
agenda without question, and need no further ‘nudging’. They are not conscious
of steering the agenda themselves, nor of the consequences.
Take, for instance, Lisa Duncan, who is a “Chevron
Environmental Specialist”, and has become a volunteer with United Way’s <http://www.earnitkeepitsaveit.org/>
Earn It! Keep It! Save It! free tax preparation program. Lisa says, "The
feeling around Chevron is that we live and work in the area and should be part
of improving the community….I wanted to help people, and I wanted it to be
interesting." <https://www.uwba.org/2013/03/chevron-taking-corporate-social-responsibility-to-heart/>
Another major mistake is to presume that anyone who says
they care about the environment, and pays them to work to ‘save the world’ must
be genuine. However, the sudden growth of ‘social giving’, and claims of
‘carbon-neutrality’, by the corporatocracy are not mirrored at the grassroots
level. More to the point, those funding the eco-social technocratic smart world
order are some of the most unsustainable/non-ecofriendly industries you could
think of. Their keenness is so ripe, you can just smell their expectation of
the profits they would reap.
So, if you’re going to say a word to anyone about Agenda 21,
you’ve really got to tell them that, first and foremost, it’s about creating
assets from nature and people. It is a system that will increasezoning and
smart growth. The plan is so huge, so ambitious, and so nearly ready – and it
encompasses EVERY vileness of the New World Order we deplore. <http://activistpost.net/teslasecret/>
Take drones, for instance. They would be used to spy on
people to ensure compliance with the new regime, e.g. gathering evidence of
anyone damaging an asset, such as marring a pretty view in an eco-tourist hotspot,
or walking on soil in a protected area.
Take smart meters – these will be but one mechanism to
enforce allocation of individual energy allowances, in the steady-state system.
Take GMOs and vaccines – they are part of the caring façade
of the NWO, as they are already being marketed as ‘socially and environmentally
responsible’ – the NewSpeak rationale for global law.
Take national sovereignty, political ideology, the ability
to choose where and who you want to be – all of these are subsumed by the New
Economy, which is a global database of assets and liabilities, comprised of
measurements of natural, built and human capital.
The right to give birth, access to water, food, clean air, a
home, a gun, and possibly even the right to life – all will come under the laws
associated with ownership of resources, and the aim of the communitarian
steady-state system: R2P - to avoid running out, to protect what they say we
have, and to always leave enough for future generations.
I hope, for all our sakes, that people will wake up to this,
and obstruct it. No one can confer the responsibility to do so, but it sure
would be good.
Think about the wars being waged – it’s not just central
banks and the expansion of development/extraction in the Third World that the
elites want. They need EVERY country to abide by the new system, because it can
only be said to work if ALL production, and ALL consumption, is tallied and
priced, so that quantum computers can claim to run global simulations of the
ups and downs of the bio-economy. The idea is that we have to balance
consumption with production, on a global scale, to maintain an ecological and
psychological equilibrium, using the steady-state economic paradigm. It
involves collecting a huge amount of data, on all of us. It is also open to
endless abuses from the manipulation of data and statistics, such as by
re-defining what constitutes scarcity, abundance, value. For this, the system
needs data from all parts of the world. Non-compliance would be deemed akin to
eco-terrorism!
The number of power-brokers playing the game of Global
Monopoly is being reduced.
The countries which are not yet following the laws of Agenda
21 need to be made to comply. Iran, Iraq, Russia, China, Egypt, Afghanistan,
and Israel have already joined the sustainability-club. Now the elites need to
convince North Korea and Syria, and more of the African nations, such as
Somalia, to conform. Widespread bombing may no longer be the choice method of
control, since this damages profitable natural capital assets. Cyber-war and
targeted drone strikes are much cleaner, less damaging to the environment – and
this is worth much MUCH more to them than the (unproductive) people they kill. <http://activistpost.net/organicfood.html>
The earth is being sold off: incorporated. And so are we.
Because part of the plan involves measuring our happiness, which they call
well-being, and so the countries which have the fittest, strongest, well-fed,
schooled and happy conformists will be the ones who secure higher measures of
GDP. This plan to ‘go beyond GDP’ – measuring the worth of the earth, and the
people – will lead to the commodification of these new assets, which will then
be tradeable, just like carbon. Over time, they come to function as currencies.
A good starting point to try and wrap your head around some
of the basic concepts is a child-friendly guide, published by <http://peacechild.org/> Peace
Child International, the U.N.’s Youth Movement, called <http://rioplus20education.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/book-one-an-introduction-to-SHD-interactive.pdf>
‘Introduction
to Sustainable Devleopment’. It describes in simple terms the new economy being
shaped by Agenda 21 (including Happiness Economics), and illustrates how lovely
it all sounds.
Even the oceans are being sold off – or rather, the services
they are deemed to provide, such as the profits gained from fishery, and
ecotourism. <http://www.globalpartnershipforoceans.org/key-issues/putting-economic-value-oceans>
Besides the Green Economy, investment in the services
provided by the oceans is growing. In February, this Blue Economy was given a
boost by a new public-private partnership,<http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2155009/businesses-urged-dive-world-bank-s-usd15bn-global-partnership-oceans>
launched with an investment
of $1.5bn by World Bank’s Global Partnership for Oceans at The Economist's
World Oceans Summit. The system requires a constant stream of data from sensors
like bioMEMS,and satellites,
<http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/Nature_valued_from_space> such as the <http://www.conservation.org/FMG/Articles/Pages/mapping_natures_benefits_ARIES.aspx>
Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services (ARIES)
technology. <http://ariesonline.org/>
Things are moving fast now. It’s time to spread the word.
Help educate others and enter the Activist Post <http://www.activistpost.com/2013/05/writing-contest-expose-agenda-21.html>
EXPOSE Agenda 21 Writing Contest. $750 in cash prizes will
be awarded. Contest closes August 1st. This article first appeared at <http://getmindsmart.com/> Get Mind Smart
Source: Julie Beal Activist Post Julie Beal is a UK-based independent
researcher who has been studying the globalist agenda for more than 20 years.
Please visit her website, <http://www.getmindsmart.com/> Get Mind Smart, for a wide range of information about
Agenda 21, Communitarianism, Ethics, Bioscience, and much more.
Also see: <http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ULuHhE-znO4/UegDQTxlMoI/
AAAAAAAARGs/8UTFD667VDA/s1600/images.jpg>
<http://www.activistpost.com/2013/07/agenda-21-chapter-8-final-coup.html>
Comments:
The first theory about where the global governance scam
was going was tied to the federal government’s suicidal spending written in
articles like “End Game”. In this one, Obama goes on TV and announces that the
US government is bankrupt and has been dissolved and replaced by a provisional
government he will lead (forever). The removal of most of our generals supports
Obama’s need to avoid “The Egyptian Solution”.
However, when the global warming hoax was fully exposed,
we wondered why there was no news indicating that these nuts were folding their
tent on carbon credits, but it’s been too quiet.
This latest theory answers that question and explains why
the UN Treaties and Executive Orders and property seizure was taking place. In
any event, if you read UN Agenda 21 and then look at what’s going on, it’s
clear that all of it is meant to implement Agenda 21 in the US.
However, the courts have been more supportive lately, as
if they don’t all think the Constitution has been totally neutered.
No matter how the global Marxists intend to try to
destroy our sovereignty, it’s easy to see who they are and we need to remove
them from elected office in 2014.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment