Don’t get me wrong. I love solar
power. I use solar power. If I could afford it I would be off the grid. But
when people start talking about replacing our current methods of electrical
generating capacity with government financed solar power I get nervous. I don’t
think anyone has taken a proper snapshot of the enormity of what a project like
this would entail. So that is what I did, using simple math I have laid out the
details of what an undertaking of this scale would cost in dollars, the size of
the needed array, storage (for when the sun isn’t shining), and possible
environmental impact. Here are the 7 reasons to consider:
The Sun delivers 1,000 watts per
square meter of energy to the earth.
While great from an individual’s perspective, when you put it into the context
of the generating capacity of the United States the problem becomes enormous.
The electrical generating capacity of the United States is 1.2 Terawatts. At face
value it would require a solar panel 463 square miles in area, but things can’t
be taken at face value.
Efficiency. Even the best solar panels, the very best, are 40%
efficient. Most commercial grade solar panels convert less than 25% of the
sun’s energy to electricity. For the sake of this article, let’s say the panels
we install are 40% efficient. The 463 square mile solar array just jumped to
1157 square miles, or just about the size of Rhode Island
The Sun doesn’t shine 24 hours per
day. Not only does the sun not shine 24
hours per day but we receive less energy at different times of the year.
Typical Coal, Gas, and Nuclear generation has to work all day, every day. In
the American Southwest (southern California and Arizona) where the sun’s energy
most abundantly reaches the surface, each square meter receives an average of
6.8Kwh per square meter of sunlight every day. Again, assuming that we need to
replace the current generating capacity of the United States over a 24 hour
period (28.8TW/day) we would now need an array 4088 square miles in area,
roughly 80% the size of Connecticut.
Cost. The current cost of 1 watt of solar power generation
purchased in industrial quantities is about $0.60USD (2013). That one dollar
accounts for just the panel. There is no infrastructure behind that number, no
land purchases, no tracking mounts to aim the panels at the sun, no wiring, no
transmission, and no labor. There are no numbers available on the cost of such
a large scale installation. Again, for the sake of this article let’s assume
economies of scale would bring the cost down to $.60USD per watt installed.
This number is a staggering $2.541 trillion dollars or $8,094 for every man,
woman, and child in the United States.
Storage. We have accounted for the generation of electricity, but
remember, the sun doesn’t shine 24 hours a day. We would need to store this
energy for when the sun isn’t shining. There is currently no feasible method to
store this much energy. The closest method that is technologically feasible is
pumped storage. During the day when the arrays are generating extra capacity
the electricity is used to pump water from a lower elevation to a higher
elevation, typically a reservoir. When the power is needed the potential energy
of the stored water is converted using hydroelectric turbines. Using a current
pumped storage facility like the Ludington Pumped Storage Facility in Ludinton,
MI, some simple math shows us 1 gallon of water can provide .95 watts of
electricity. Using a generalization that we have to store half of the
electricity generated for later use we would need to store just over 15
trillion gallons of water. Since we need an elevated point to start with, maybe
we could drain and refill a third of Lake Tahoe every day?
Transmission. If we installed our array in the Southwest we would still
need part of this electricity to travel all of the way to Maine. While not
impossible it would require us to generate even more electricity due to typical
line losses.
Environmental Impact. Ah, the law of unintended consequences. What happens when
you take 40% of the Sun’s energy and suck it out of the atmosphere over a 4000
square mile area? I don’t think anyone knows. One thing I can tell you is that
the general area would be much colder, the air denser, and any moisture in it
would condense. Maybe there would be a vicious fog/sun cycle over the array?
What would happen to all of the desert animals, plants, etc?
Again, I am not trying to say that
solar power is bad. What I am trying to say is solar power is not feasible to
replace all of the generating capacity we currently utilize. Like it or not we
couldn’t afford this as a country, even the United States credit card doesn’t
have a limit this high. Clean energy is not the government’s responsibility, it
is an individual responsibility. For what it is worth coal, natural gas, oil,
and nuclear are here to stay until the individual decides it is time to change.
Source: Tin Hat Ranch, tinhatranch.com 
No comments:
Post a Comment