The headlines
read that the unemployment rate has dropped to its lowest point since Obama
took office. This is a case where a headline can be 100 percent true and
completely wrong in its implications.
If the
unemployment rate drop from 7.3 percent down to 7 percent is actually
meaningful, the Federal Reserve should immediately end its bond-buying program,
called “quantitative easing.” One can assume that the economy is rapidly
heating up, and we should all be concerned about inflationary risks created by
more monetary pumping. When coupled with the net 750,000 new hires reported by
the Labor Department over the past three months, the economy must be on fire.
However, the
same report that shows the unemployment rate drop is disastrous when comparing
data for the past three months.
The Labor Force
Participation Rate dropped by 0.2 percentage points in that two-month period,
meaning 666,400 fewer people were in the labor force in November than in
September, roughly the equivalent of an entire congressional district.
The number of
employed people is almost as grim. If you are to believe the unemployment
report, only 83,000 more people were employed in November than in September.
The
unemployment rate did not drop because of people getting jobs, but instead due
to another massive labor drop-out. If this sounds familiar, it is because our
nation has seen a staggering drop in the labor participation rate over the past
five years.
Since Obama
took office, the civilian non-institutionalized population age 16 years and
over has grown by approximately 11.8 million people. However, the labor force has
only grown by slightly more than 1 million people. Fully 91 percent, or 10.7
million of the increased population that are 16 years old and over are not only
not working; they are not even trying to find a job.
This
precipitous workforce participation rate decline of 2.7 percent has reached
lows not seen since Jimmy Carter was president in 1978.
And it isn’t
old people leaving the workforce in droves. Instead it is a startling drop in
participation by teenagers and young adults who are failing to launch their
lives.
While the
unemployment rate for teenagers is virtually identical today as it was in
January 2009, at 20.8 percent, the percentage of teenagers actually in the
workforce has declined by 4.5 points. This means that while the unemployment
rate for teens is virtually the same, the number of teens who are actually
employed has declined by 716,000.
Headline
writers love to take the easy unemployment rate top line, but almost three
quarters of a million fewer teens have jobs today than when Obama took office,
with half a million fewer even looking for work.
This is the
reality of Obama’s new normal economy: Carter levels of labor participation and
teens failing to even try to get a job. Of course, with revelations that the
unemployment rate books may have been cooked by the government, it is probably
wise to ignore their reported unemployment rate altogether.
Source: NetRightDaily.com, 12/9/13, by
Rick Manning http://netrightdaily.com/2013/12/unemployment-rate-meaningless/#ixzz2ocFwd1l8 Rick Manning (@rmanning957) is vice
president of public policy and communications for Americans for Limited
Government and a former public affairs chief of staff at the U.S. Department of
Labor.
No comments:
Post a Comment