A plan to expand
MARTA with funds from an additional half-cent sales tax in Fulton and DeKalb is
getting more and more attention from Georgia lawmakers, although not all that
attention is positive.
“I’m for it,” said
prominent Republican Sen. Brandon Beach of Alpharetta at a gathering of state
transportation industry leaders, corporations and lawmakers on Tuesday. “I’m
for the voters being able to decide if they want that half-penny to go towards
transit expansion. I think transit is going to become more and more important,
especially with economic development.”
Beach cited recent
corporate hub relocations like State Farm, Kaiser Permanente, Mercedes-Benz,
NCR and PulteGroup as proof of MARTA’s draw. All of the relocation decisions
were driven, at least in part, by access to transit.
At Tuesday’s
Georgia Transportation Summit hosted by the American Council of Engineering
Companies of Georgia and the Georgia Department of Transportation in
partnership with the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, Michael Sullivan was sounding
a similar note. Sullivan is chairman of the Georgia Transportation Alliance, a
policy arm of the chamber that has advocated for increased transportation
spending. The alliance was a key supporter of a sweeping, $1 billion-per-year
transportation funding bill that passed earlier this year and took effect July
1.
That money is going
toward roads and bridges, not MARTA. But finding a way to financially support
the transit agency is the next logical step, Sullivan said. “I think it has a
real shot,” Sullivan said. “Pardon the pun, I think that’s a train that’s
leaving the station. Whether it reaches its destination the 2016 session or the
2017 session, we need it as a region and as a state.”
Beach and Sullivan
both noted that 2016 is an election year, meaning the issue could mean the
issue gets bumped to 2017 if MARTA doesn’t get traction quickly after the
session starts in January. Capitol-watchers agree the next session is likely to
be a short one. And other issues like education reform and casino gambling loom
large.
Fran Millar,
R-Atlanta, said that he believes the bill will face serious opposition from the
DeKalb and Fulton delegations. "You have this
sense by a lot of us that we've been paying one penny for how long, and don't
tell me everybody doesn't benefit from MARTA," Millar said. "Some of
us think if we're going to have a regional transportation system, let's let
regional people pay for it."
MARTA Board
Chairman Robbie Ashe explained to about 700 summit attendees on Tuesday that
the new transportation funding bill that passed this year (HB 170) enabled
counties to collect up to a penny per dollar for transportation projects, if
voters give the OK in a referendum. However, state lawmakers would need to
tweak the law during the next legislative session so the money could go to
MARTA rather than to a county.
Also, MARTA wants the
time frame for the additional sales tax to be extended from its current cap of
five years to 42 years, so that it matches the life of the existing sales tax
collections in Clayton, Fulton and DeKalb and so that MARTA can borrow against
the proceeds.
By issuing bonds,
MARTA could use the estimated $200 million in new sales tax revenue to bankroll
about $4 billion of construction, Ashe said. If MARTA obtained federal matching
funds, it could be looking at an $8 billion windfall. Enough, MARTA officials think,
to nearly double the existing size of the system and transform the region.
The money could pay
for a heavy rail expansion along Ga. 400 to Alpharetta, a heavy rail expansion
along I-20 East in South DeKalb and a light rail or trolley system to connect
MARTA to the vastly underserved Emory/CDC corridor. It might even be enough to
help the city of Atlanta realize its goal of expanding Streetcar service to the
Beltline, Ashe has said.
Millar said MARTA
may not be able to get all the federal match funding it is aiming for, in which
case it would have to downgrade its ambitions for heavy rail to bus rapid
transit or else pick and choose between items on its project list. He said
MARTA should be transparent about which projects would go first, second and
third, as well as lay out the estimated timetable for construction before it
seeks approval for more funding."Let's lay it all out there," Millar
said. "Those are the questions that need to be asked and answered."
State Sen. Steve
Gooch, R-Dahlonega, who is majority whip and vice-chairman of the Senate
Transportation Committee, said that while he supports MARTA, he believes that
time is needed to measure the effects of HB 170 before lawmakers make another
major decision on transportation funding.
“I think there’s
some potential there to have that discussion,” Gooch said. “I don’t know if it
is crucial that we move on it this year.”
Source: http://www.myajc.com/news/news/local/legislators-pondering-a-marta-expansion-referendum/npK4H/?utm_source=Marco%2C+MARTA+-+GaPundit+for+November+12%2C+2015&utm_campaign=GaPundit+Todd+Rehm+Georgia+Politics+04202015&utm_medium=email
Comments
Brandon
Beach is the head of Northpoint Mall CID. He has been carping for the “up 400”
heavy rail to Northpoint since 2012. It’s a $2.5 billion boondoggle.
Fran
Millar is wrong about expanding to other counties. MARTA is the creature of
DeKalb and Fulton and now Clayton for buses and should remain that way.
MARTA bus
and train ridership is still around 3% of the population and the cost of
maintaining MARTA is double its revenue.
It’s a failed, subsidized business plan that doesn’t break even.
The MARTA
train is a really expensive mode of transportation. $2.5 billion could buy new
cars for 100,000 MARTA riders.
Bus
transportation should be privatized and run by private companies with no tax
subsidies.
$2.5
billion could mill and resurface 25,000 lane-miles of broken asphalt roads.
That is what tax dollars should be paying for.
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
1 comment:
We absolutely should expand MARTA in Fulton and DeKalb and any criticism needs to recognize that it's an unfinished project. If you built the frame of a house but never built a roof over it and completed it, of course you wouldn't live in it.
With desperately needed expansion, the 3% that currently utilize it will grow significantly because it will go more places people need to travel.
As far as the 'subsidy', do you seriously think roads are 'free'? What kind of return do they provide? Also, 100,000 additional cars on Atlanta's gridlocked roads would be just brilliant.
Post a Comment