During
the recent Fox Business News – Wall Street Journal Republican Primary debate,
United States senators Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) had what was
probably one of the most meaningful exchanges so far in the race to decide the
party’s nominee for president.
Paul
and Rubio traded jabs over military spending, an issue that has divided many in
the Republican Party and there’s little consensus on who won the exchange. That
being said, the neoconservatives like Rubio are wrong when it comes to military
spending and it’s time the Republican Party, as a whole, realize it.
Let’s
be clear about something. When Paul says you’re not a serious conservative if
you’re willing to spend another $1 trillion, on loan from China, on the
Department of Defense (DOD), he says so because the DOD is rife with fraud and
waste.
For example,
the DOD spent $2 million dollars for every one Syrian rebel they trained. Guess
what? The majority of them never showed up to fight on our behalf after being
trained. That’s right, $2 million to train one person that
never showed up. The DOD also spent $43
million to build one single gas station in Afghanistan, which will
never be used. If that wasn’t enough, Congress recently pushed $436
million on weapons that military experts explicitly said are not needed.
Yes,
managing our military is one of the few roles the federal government performs
today with actual constitutional authority to do so, but does that mean they
should continue to receive blank checks?
The
DOD clearly has money to flush down the toilet, and the American taxpayers are
ultimately responsible for that money.
How is
it that conservatives trust no wing of government to operate efficiently, but
believe the DOD is infallible? If you’re serious about cutting the deficit and
tackling our national debt, then understand this simple fact—government, by
design, creates waste. The DOD isn’t exempt from this fact.
Neocons
need to stop pretending defense spending is untouchable in order to pacify the
multi-billion dollar defense contractors that lobby them for tax-dollars that
are not needed to secure our well-being. Even the United States Army agrees.
You’re
either serious and principled about cutting waste, or you’re not. And when
you’re not, liberal Democrats then get to say, “Well, you spent money we didn’t
have on this, so we want more welfare.” The same goes for the Constitution.
When Republicans ignore the 4th Amendment and push the NSA, Democrats get to
ignore the 10th Amendment and push the EPA. In Washington, I think they call
this “bipartisanship.”
http://truthinmedia.com/lotfi-dear-neocons-rand-paul-military-spending/
No comments:
Post a Comment