There are 10,000 homeowners in Dunwoody and 1000 DHA members
including 35 DHA voting board members and it has a website. It includes elected officials and emeritus
members.
Membership is individual.
The DHA website allows Dunwoody Homeowners the opportunity to join and
support DHA activities for $40 per year.
Many individuals do join to attend meetings and volunteer to work at city
events including the Dunwoody July 4th Parade and “Light up
Dunwoody”.
The majority of DHA members tend to support the city establishment
including City Council initiatives, Chamber of Commerce activities and city
non-profits like Preservation Trust. Most
appointed city board positions are filled by DHA members. They are better
prepared to do these jobs, because DHA has continued to review most of the
zoning applications scheduled for presentation to city boards
The danger of having DHA serve as the city board training camp is
that they can develop ‘group-think’ and appears to have an ‘establishment’
bias. Most are active in many other city
activities and they tend to be Pro-City.
They do not challenge city decisions that are controversial. They leave that to the actual homeowners who
are affected.
Dunwoody voters have not supported all of the changes made in
Dunwoody since 2008 including the Park Bond vote in 2011 and the T-SPLOST vote
in 2012. Save Dunwoody arose to oppose
high costs of some “low priority” projects and the Charter rewrite that allows
the City Council to do whatever they want without voter input.
The larger problem is that Dunwoody adopted “canned” ordinances
written to implement UN Agenda 21. That’s how we got on-street bike lanes,
multi-use paths. high density zoning and land use plans and “economic
development”. The current split lot and
Manget Way lawsuits are a direct result of city staff decisions. City staff is fully trained in Agenda 21
implementation. We also continue to be
pressured to expand our residential intersections to invite “cut through”
access to commuters looking for shortcuts from I-285 to GA-400. The intersection plans are done by expensive Agenda
21 compliant consulting firms.
They supported the current ordinances and codes. The Dunwoody
“Establishment” includes all elected officials, the DHA, the Chamber of
Commerce and their friends. They have no
mechanisms in place to “represent” homeowners, who are affected by city
decisions. Homeowners continue to be “on
their own”.
The other problem is that community activists are usually less
focused on tight priorities for limited city resources and more focused on
adding things for the city to spend money on. The most expensive items the city is required
to upgrade and maintain are roads, intersections and storm sewers.
We should have been spending $4 million a year on road maintenance,
but we’ve only spend $2 million a year until recently. The current City Council is attempting to
move funds to roads to catch up. We need
contractors to do a better job at lower cost
The DHA did good job representing homeowners to the DeKalb zoning
board. But when the city formed in 2009,
they didn’t question controversial city plans. They became supporters of all
city plans. The DHA could do more to
find out what the other 90% of homeowners think by posting polls on their
website that address current priorities.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
1 comment:
Never have I seen a blog post that was so wrong. Check your facts Agenda 21 really? Want to count the lawsuits that the DHA was involved in fighting development ? DH A meetings are open to the public, they are seeking board members from the membership all the time. They hear local subdivision concerns all the time. Agenda 21 really?
Post a Comment