Time to end printing press money for Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau (and the Fed) By
Robert Romano, 7/1/16
Often times Congress does not get
praised when members do the hard work on behalf of the American people to
protect their interests. The House Financial Services appropriations bill is
one such notable bill that you will hear almost nothing about.
The House Financial Services bill is
an Article I bill. It will defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(CFPB) from getting printing press money from the Federal Reserve. The
background here is that the Bureau is getting about $490 million a year from
the nation’s central bank.
That is, without any votes in
Congress, an agency inside the Fed with vast rulemaking powers into the
nation’s economy is self-funding — with money from a printing press.
Defunding this unconstitutionally
funded agency and subjecting it to traditional appropriations is a good first
step.
As background, it should be noted
that the Federal Reserve as a whole is self-funding including the CFPB, according
to the central bank’s website:
“Operating expenses of the Reserve Banks, net of amounts reimbursed by the U.S.
Treasury and other entities for services the Reserve Banks provided as fiscal
agents, totaled $3.9 billion in 2015. In addition, the Reserve Banks were
assessed $689 million for the costs related to producing, issuing, and retiring
currency, $705 million for Board expenditures, and $490 million to fund the
operations of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.”
That includes employee expenses,
which similarly come out of the printing press, which with
maximum pay at $242,500 a year at
the high end is about 18
percent more than what even Cabinet secretaries can receive and about 33
percent more than what regular federal bureaucrats receive including most political appointees.
CFPB employees can get even more
than that, with
maximum pay at $259,500 — making them
among the highest paid employees in the federal government (even
more than the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court) and second only to the President himself who makes
$400,000 a year. On top of that, because the defined
benefit retirement plans at the Federal Reserve are based on pay scale in the
formula, pensions too would be well in
excess of what typical federal government employees receive.
All at the discretion of the Fed’s
Board of Governors, pursuant to Section
10 of the Federal Reserve Act:
“The Board shall determine and prescribe the manner in which its obligations
shall be incurred and its disbursements and expenses allowed and paid, and may
leave on deposit in the Federal Reserve banks the proceeds of assessments
levied upon them to defray its estimated expenses and the salaries of its
members and employees, whose employment, compensation, leave, and expenses
shall be governed solely by the provisions of this Act, specific amendments
thereof, and rules and regulations of the Board not inconsistent therewith; and
funds derived from such assessments shall not be construed to be Government
funds or appropriated moneys.”
And Federal Reserve employees are
not even technically government employees — with the exceptions of the Fed’s
Board of Governors, and the head of the CFPB, who are Senate-confirmed and are
government employees and subject to a different pay scale — even though they’re
issuing government regulations. As noted on the
Richmond Fed’s website, “Employees of
the Federal Reserve Banks are not government employees. They are paid as part
of the expenses of their employing Reserve Bank.”
“Expenses,” indeed. More like, “We
printed $3.9 billion to pay ourselves and set our own pay scales and pay out
platinum defined benefit pension plans.” Since the rules for pay and pensions
are set solely at the Board’s discretion and beyond the purview of Congress,
the courts and even the President, it appears to be rife for abuse.
But, with the House legislation
defunding the CFPB’s printing press money, that may be beginning to come to an
end.
In a statement praising the
legislation, Americans for Limited Government President Rick Manning stated,
“It will end the individual mandate under Obamacare, defend churches against
IRS abuses. It will defund certain Treasury regulations regarding investments
in overseas coal-fired plants. It will prohibit the Financial Stability Board
from taking over and bailing out financial institutions under Dodd-Frank. It
cuts off any funding for the Cuban military and intelligence. It defunds Net
Neutrality. And it even comes in $1.5 billion under the previous year’s
appropriations level.”
Manning added, “The Financial
Services appropriations subcommittee led by Chairman Ander Crenshaw should be
very proud of their work shown by their determination to not allow President
Obama’s abuses of power to remain unchecked. Americans for Limited
Government strongly urges the passage of this legislation through the Rules
Committee, the House of Representatives and Congress as a whole.”
Manning also urged action on an
amendment by U.S. Reps. Sean Duffy and Tom Marino that would decrease funding
to the Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) account at the
Department of Justice to offset $20.7 in illegal monies from legal settlements;
an amendment by U.S. Rep. Ken Buck that would eliminate the salary of the IRS
Commissioner who is currently under consideration for impeachment after lying
to Congress; and U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar who has an amendment to deny IRS
employees bonuses given complicity in the targeting scandal against the tea
party and other non-profit groups.
This is the way the power of the
purse is supposed to operate, Manning said, concluding, “Using the
Congressional power of the purse to limit the executive branch is exactly what
the Framers intended when they implemented the separation of powers.” Action on
the bill is expected after the July 4 holiday.
http://netrightdaily.com/2016/07/time-end-printing-press-money-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-fed/
No comments:
Post a Comment