Some individuals and organizations have raised concerns about the funding of recent protests and instances of civil unrest in the United States, suggesting that some of these events, particularly those associated with the Democratic Party or aligned causes, may be receiving financial support from various sources, including potentially from government grants and private donations.
Specifically, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) has been mentioned in connection with receiving significant grants, including millions from government sources, and private donations through the Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue. Some sources suggest these funds might be used to support protest activities.
Additionally, there are allegations that foreign individuals and entities, potentially linked to governments like China, are funding far-left organizations, including those that have been associated with disruptive protests. For example, Mr. Singham, residing in the People's Republic of China, is reportedly involved in a network of nonprofits that send funds to organizations like the People's Forum and the Justice Education Fund. The Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), which is said to be affiliated with ongoing Los Angeles riots, has also been linked to Chinese government affiliations.
It's important to note that these are allegations and concerns raised by some individuals and organizations, and investigations are ongoing. For instance, the House Oversight Committee is investigating the funding of protests linked to the Chinese Communist Party and has called for Mr. Singham to testify. CHIRLA has denied any involvement in riots.
Furthermore, it's worth noting that other views exist. Some sources, such as those from the Black Lives Matter movement, explain their funding sources and how they use donations to support their activities, including providing grants to grassroots organizations and supporting individuals in need through programs like the Student Solidarity Fund and the Survival Fund.
The issue of funding for political protests in the United States is complex and involves diverse sources, motivations, and accusations.
How are democrat riots funded
Some individuals and organizations linked to or affiliated with the Democratic party have been reported to receive funding that may be connected to protest activities. However, it's important to note that the term "riots" implies illegal and violent acts, and the scope of the provided information focuses on funding for organizations involved in protests and activism, which may or may not involve such actions.
Here's
what the information suggests:
· Some organizations with
progressive or Democratic affiliations receive significant funding. For
example, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), which has been
linked to anti-ICE protests, has received substantial government grants and funding
from Democratic fundraising platforms like ActBlue. Organizations like Vote
Save America are also mentioned as progressive advocacy arms.
· "Dark Money"
may play a role. Groups that don't disclose their donors, often called
"dark money" groups, are increasingly influencing political outcomes
through various means, including funding Super PACs. Some of these groups, particularly
those like Future Forward, have been found to heavily favor Democrats in the
2024 election cycle, with some reports indicating that a majority of traceable
dark money backed Democrats in 2024.
· The sources of dark
money are often opaque. While Super PACs must disclose their donors, shell
companies and nonprofits that don't reveal their funding sources can contribute
to them, effectively hiding the original source of the money.
· Some organizations specifically focus on supporting the right to protest. Groups like the Piper Fund, an initiative of the Proteus Fund, resource grassroots organizations and support community-led coalitions working to protect and expand democratic rights, including the right to protest.
Important
Considerations:
· The information
provided primarily focuses on funding for organized political activism, which
does not necessarily equate to funding for "riots." The legality and
nature of the activities undertaken by these organizations vary.
· The term "dark
money" refers to undisclosed funding sources and doesn't inherently imply
illegal activity, though it raises concerns about transparency and undue
influence.
· Some sources suggest
that the issue of "dark money" affects both Democrats and
Republicans, although the balance of funding may vary depending on the election
cycle.
· It's important to distinguish between organizations that fund protests and those that might fund or incite violent or destructive actions. The provided information centers on the former.
In conclusion, while some organizations linked to or affiliated with the Democratic party are reported to receive funding for activities that include protests, the connection to illegal and violent "riots" is not explicitly established in the provided search results. The funding landscape is complex and includes a mix of government grants, donations from individuals and organizations, and potentially "dark money" from undisclosed sources.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+are+democrat+riots+funded
Comments
Democrats are funding these riots by laundering tax dollars through 501C nonprofits. They are organized and scheduled to occur daily using lame slogans. They mutate their protest signs like a virus, from “Black Lives Matter” to ”No Kings”. Google “Democrat Protest Signs”.
New protests can be staffed with a 24 hour notice. Local protestors are notified and show up to demonstrate for Hamas and Iran. Signs and Organizers are flown to protest sites. Protests are funded by rogue nonprofit grants. DOGE and DOJ are following the money to identify these nonprofits.
Democrats set the bar low by claiming that the disruptive, violent, fire-bombing, property damaging “protests” are not riots. The US Congress needs to define “free political speech” to exclude the law breaking. “Protests” should be confined to stadiums and conference centers rented by sponsors with “fake news” coverage. Protests should be banned from streets, highways, government buildings, office complexes, commercial and residential areas to allow citizens to perform their daily routines without disruption. Local Police should be tasked with monitoring protest events, enforcing the law and arresting all who violate it. This breach began with “sit-ins” in the 1960s.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment