I have been aware of the Clean Water
Act since Bill Clinton was in office. Back then reading about the EPA and their
goals, it was apparent that it was all about land grab, and very little about
worrying about clean water!!! Sure, if the barnyard had water runoff when it
rained into a stream, creek, or river there was diluted farm animal feces
getting into the water. At that time I thought that anyone that had some land
that tilted toward a water supply, they would be in jeopardy of losing their
land.
When Clinton was in office, I
thought that this bill... if enforced .... would be the end of most farming
operations across America!! The take over of our family farms is sickening!!
Upon further inspection of the bill, I soon found out that this would affect
anyone living in the mountains or foothills, that they would be in danger of
losing their land.
If I can remember, there was a 200
foot rule! the landowner would lose all land within 200 feet of a river,
stream, creek, or a water runoff during a downpour of rain, and also if the
land was close to a railway, they would also have to give up some of their
land, because they would be within the designated area... If you owned land in
a hilly area you were screwed.. Runoff of water, in all directions, from the
top of the hill would be too close to your 'Home.'
There was no “Grandfather Clause” that you would be given an exemption, because you had already had a family farm, or property that was handed down for generations, and not a new farm being started since the passing of the Clean Water Act. In other words, no one would be exempt!!!
There was no “Grandfather Clause” that you would be given an exemption, because you had already had a family farm, or property that was handed down for generations, and not a new farm being started since the passing of the Clean Water Act. In other words, no one would be exempt!!!
To the BLM and EPA.. Bite me.... Susoni
Snip
The EPA is in the process, right
this very minute, of seizing control over all private land in the United
States. They are following the United Nations blueprint, their minion Gina
McCarthy is implementing it, and B. Hussein Obama is facilitating it.
Anywhere in America where it rains
or where water collects or through which water moves will now, according to
this new rule change they are implementing, be under their control. Not because
Congress or the people give them that authority or jurisdiction, but simply
because they are seizing the power. It is just another component of the
illegitimate tyranny which is oppressing the American people.
On Tuesday the agency which operates
as the misnamed Environmental Protection Agency unveiled their proposed change
to the Clean Water Act, which would extend their regulatory control to
temporary wetlands and waterways.
This definition consists of any
water, including seasonal ponds, streams, runoff and collection areas and
irrigation water. It could include runoff from watering your lawn, or puddles
on your own property. They will control the presence of and can prohibit
through regulation, your right to the water and your actions regarding water
upon your own land. The opportunities for their abuse would be limitless.
Louisiana Senator David Vitter, the
ranking Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee,
offered an understated precautionary objection stating, “The … rule may be one
of the most significant private property grabs in U.S. history.”
The EPA proposal would extend their
authority to include “pollution regulations” to “intermittent and ephemeral
streams and wetlands” – which are created temporarily during wet seasons or
following rainfall.
Recognize this for what it is
America; The EPA is giving themselves legal jurisdiction to replace our rights
with their permissions anywhere it rains or water exists.
They are expanding the same kind of
California fish-based drought or Nevada tortoise land restrictions or Oregon
spotted owl tyranny to every square inch of the United States.
The EPA is asserting that all ground
water, whether temporary or not and regardless of size is part of the “waters
of the United States.”
Their position is in contradiction
to the Supreme Court rulings in 2001 and 2006, restricting the EPA to flowing
and sizeable, “relatively” permanent bodies of water such as “oceans, rivers,
streams and lakes.” Of course, progressives just keep trying until they get
what they want, and they never have enough.
The proposed rule change is now in a
90 day comment period during which they will assess just how much they can get
away with, based upon public outcry and pushback.
Senator Vitter accused the EPA of
“picking and choosing” their science and of attempting to “take another step
toward outright permitting authority over virtually any wet area in the
country.” He also warned that if approved, more private owners could expect to
be sued by “environmental groups.”
Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) shares
Vitter’s concerns, warning of potential economic damage and questioning the
EPA’s motivations.
She said, “t appears that the EPA
is seeking to dramatically expand its jurisdictional reach under the Clean
Water Act. If EPA is not careful, this rule could effectively give the federal
government control of nearly all of our state.
Of course, that is exactly what they are after,
as well as 49 other states and territories.Source: Email from VICTORIA BAER Jacksonville, FL May 17, 2014 7:54 AM : New EPA Land Grab, Complete Control over all Private Land in America Posted By: Susoni [E-Mail] Date: Friday, 16-May-2014 15:14:16
New EPA Land
Grab, Complete Control Over All Private Land in America Posted on 10 April, 2014 by Rick Wells,
gopthedailydose.
The
EPA is in the process, right this very minute, of seizing control over all
private land in the United States. They are following the United Nations
blueprint, their minion Gina McCarthy is implementing it, and B. Hussein Obama
is facilitating it.
Anywhere
in America where it rains or where water collects or through which water moves
will now, according to this new rule change they are implementing, be under
their control. Not because Congress or the people give them that authority or
jurisdiction, but simply because they are seizing the power. It is just another
component of the illegitimate tyranny which is oppressing the American people.On Tuesday the agency which operates as the misnamed Environmental Protection Agency unveiled their proposed change to the Clean Water Act, which would extend their regulatory control to temporary wetlands and waterways.
This definition consists of any water, including seasonal ponds, streams, runoff and collection areas and irrigation water. It could include runoff from watering your lawn, or puddles on your own property. They will control the presence of and can prohibit through regulation, your right to the water and your actions regarding water upon your own land. The opportunities for their abuse would be limitless.
Louisiana Senator David Vitter, the ranking Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, offered an understated precautionary objection stating, “The … rule may be one of the most significant private property grabs in U.S. history.”
The EPA proposal would extend their authority to include “pollution regulations” to “intermittent and ephemeral streams and wetlands” – which are created temporarily during wet seasons or following rainfall.
Recognize
this for what it is America; The EPA is giving themselves legal jurisdiction to
replace our rights with their permissions anywhere it rains or water exists.
They
are expanding the same kind of California fish-based drought or Nevada tortoise
land restrictions or Oregon spotted owl tyranny to every square inch of the
United States.
The
EPA is asserting that all ground water, whether temporary or not and regardless
of size is part of the “waters of the United States.”
Their
position is in contradiction to the Supreme Court rulings in 2001 and 2006,
restricting the EPA to flowing and sizeable, “relatively” permanent bodies of
water such as “oceans, rivers, streams and lakes.” Of course, progressives just
keep trying until they get what they want, and they never have enough.
The
proposed rule change is now in a 90 day comment period during which they will
assess just how much they can get away with, based upon public outcry and
pushback.
Senator
Vitter accused the EPA of “picking and choosing” their science and of
attempting to “take another step toward outright permitting authority over
virtually any wet area in the country.” He also warned that if approved, more
private owners could expect to be sued by “environmental groups.”
Senator
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) shares Vitter’s concerns, warning of potential economic
damage and questioning the EPA’s motivations.
She
said, “[I]t appears that the EPA is seeking to dramatically expand its
jurisdictional reach under the Clean Water Act. If EPA is not careful, this
rule could effectively give the federal government control of nearly all of our
state.
Of
course, that is exactly what they are after, as well as 49 other states and
territories.
Rick Wells is a
conservative author who believes an adherence the U.S. Constitution would solve
many of today’s problems. “Like” him on Facebook and “Follow” him on Twitter.
Source: http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/04/10/new-epa-land-grab-complete-control-over-all-private-land-in-america/
No comments:
Post a Comment