UN Agenda 21
implementation in the US included an assault on US private property rights
embedded in the establishment of unelected governance at the State and Local
level via Regional Commissions. The cure for this is the repeal of
“Regionalism” laws passed in the 2000s to allow this abuse. The other source of
abuse was Obama’s EPA seizing farms and livestock and condemning other
properties. These laws are still on the books and need to be repealed.
Regional Commissions in
States wastefully expand public projects way beyond appropriate critical
infrastructure. Despite the fact that our water and sewer pipes are rotting and
leaking and our roads and highways are in bad shape and are overcrowded, poorly
designed and dangerous in large metro areas.
these clowns propose bike lanes, multi-use paths and public transit with
limited ridership. They propose spending $billions to deliver empty bike lanes,
empty multi-use paths and empty trains and buses. Voters do get to approve some
of these atrocities through SPLOST votes and routinely have to fight to defeat
them.
We already had
“easements” on our properties and when these are excessive, property owners get
to pay the taxes, but cannot use their own property and their property can be
seized by road expansion without compensation. Homeowners need to take this
into account before they buy a home.
Parks started as donated
land, but now Parks are “greenspaces” that cost tax dollars. They are often
empty future crime scenes and cities don’t know what to do with them. The best
parks are swim and tennis facilities privately owned by subdivisions that are
funded with membership fees, not by tax dollars.
The US infrastructure is
designed to accommodate cars, but UN Agenda 21 implementation required that we
eliminate cars and establish “transit villages” in megacities and abandon all
rural areas to establish the “Wilding Project”. This lunacy has been stopped by
angry property owners, but local governments are still supporting this
nonsense.
The cost of expanding
roads and highways has quadrupled since 2010, because cities are using civil
engineering firms to design road expansion. Roundabouts are replacing road
intersections because these engineers like to design them.
Cities now control
private commercial real estate by imposing “master-plans” on properties. UN
dictated Land Use and Zoning plans are in place. See article below.
We’re From the
Government and We’re Here to Build a Bike Path - Municipal officials are using
eminent domain to take private property for recreational uses. By Steven
Malanga, 2/14/20, WSJ.
A handful of farmers in
Ohio’s Mahoning County are getting an unpleasant lesson in government power at
the hands of a local park district. Mill Creek Metro Parks, a public agency
governed by five unelected commissioners, wants to take over an abandoned
railroad line running through about a dozen local farms for a recreational bike
path. Last year, when landowners balked at the idea of strangers wandering
across their properties, the park district decided to invoke eminent domain and
gain right of way.
“I asked the park
representatives if there was any way we could negotiate on this, and they told
me, ‘The time for talking is over. We’re taking this property,’ ” says
Ohio state Rep. Don Manning, who tried to intervene on the farmers’ behalf.
Rep. Manning, a Republican, has sponsored legislation that would limit the use
of eminent domain in Ohio.
The practice of
government taking land for recreational uses—typically bike lanes, hiking paths
and fashionable “rail trails” and “greenways”—is spreading across the country,
marking a sharp and troubling expansion of eminent domain.
The Takings Clause of
the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment grants government the authority to seize
property to be used for the public good, as long as government pays “just
compensation” to the owner.
Over the years, the
Supreme Court has consistently expanded what is considered a “public good” to
justify government seizures. In 2005, for instance, the high court upheld the
taking of Susette Kelo’s waterfront home by the city of New London, Conn., so
that a local development corporation could build high-end condos and a hotel.
The redevelopment was intended to boost property values and increase municipal
tax revenues.
Meanwhile, cities and
towns across America have in recent years developed an appetite for different
types of lengthy, sometimes intrusive hiking and bike paths. Advocates contend
that such recreational amenities are vital because they promote alternative
forms of transportation. Bike trails “are increasingly being used as a
non-recreational means of transportation, particularly by lower-income residents
without access to a motor vehicle,” testified Jason Segedy, director of
planning and urban development for Akron, Ohio, in opposition to Rep. Manning’s
bill.
Municipal land grabs
often result in bitter confrontations. Officials in Sioux City, Iowa, sought to
complete a riverfront recreation trail in 2017 by offering Brad Lepper half of
what an independent county commission had ruled his property was worth. Rather
than pay up in full, the city invoked eminent domain, prompting Mr. Lepper to
wage a two-year legal battle. He represented himself for much of the time.
“It can be an
intimidating process for a small-business owner to fight this, and many people
probably wouldn’t risk it,” Mr. Lepper says. “I took this on myself because I
couldn’t afford to run up big legal bills, but I knew the property was worth
much more.” Hiring his own appraiser and planning expert, Mr. Lepper ultimately
won an $82,500 settlement. Still, it was an uncomfortable experience. “I’m a
local businessman. I have to do business here. I didn’t want to fight the
city.”
Eminent domain also
divides communities. A plan by the town of Swampscott, Mass., to construct a
2-mile trail through the North Shore Boston suburb sparked a years-long battle
pitting officials and some supportive residents against those whose property
the path would cross. One property owner, Kim Nassar, published
a letter in the local newspaper claiming that she and other opponents
had been “vilified and maligned” and branded as “selfish” for lobbying against
the project.
Since residents voted in
a divisive June 2017 election to dedicate some $850,000 to the Swampscott
trail, including an unspecified amount of money for eminent-domain seizures,
the town has continued to work to design and fund the project. But an attorney
hired by 28 homeowners says he has warned town officials that this battle may
be more costly than they anticipate. “There are properties along this path
whose value could be substantially diminished,” says Peter E. Flynn. “Juries
tend to be sympathetic to property owners if they can afford to fight a case
like this in court, and I have seen court awards that can bust the budget of a
town.”
The issue also divides
elected officials. In 2017 Wisconsin ended the use of eminent domain for
recreational projects in a bill signed by then- Gov. Scott Walker, a
Republican, after objections from landowners. According to Wisconsin Active
Communities Association, a recreational group, 17 bike- and walking-trail
projects for which the use of eminent domain was planned have stalled since Mr.
Walker’s action. Current Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, has sought to
re-establish government’s authority to take property in these cases, but so far
he’s been blocked by Republicans in Madison. “Somebody else’s recreational
opportunity should not be forced on my property,” argues state Rep. Rob
Stafsholt, who helped push through the ban.
The Kelo decision
provoked a backlash. Some states passed laws restricting eminent domain for
economic development. But as local governments, park systems and state agencies
become bolder about seizing property for recreational use, don’t be surprised
if the next eminent-domain case with national significance involves a bike path
in your backyard.
Mr. Malanga is senior
editor of City Journal.
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment