2009 Nobel
Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow shockingly claims he was told by a top military
veteran that the Obama administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders
is whether or not they will obey an order to fire on U.S. citizens.
Garrow was nominated three years ago for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize and
is the founder of The Pink Pagoda Girls, an organization dedicated to rescuing
baby girls from “gendercide” in China. Garrow has been personally involved in
“helping rescue more than 36,000 Chinese baby girls from death.”
He is a
public figure, not an anonymous voice on the Internet, which makes his claim
all the more disturbing. “I have just been informed by a former senior
military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will
stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The
new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US
citizens or not”. Those who will not are being removed,” Garrow wrote on his
Facebook page, later following up the post by adding the man who told him is,
“one of America’s foremost military heroes,” whose goal in divulging the
information was to “sound the alarm.”
Garrow’s
claim is even more explosive given that the country is in the throes of a
national debate about gun control, with gun rights advocates keen to insist
that the founders put the second amendment in the Constitution primarily as a
defense against government tyranny. It also follows reports on Sunday
that General James Mattis, head of the United States Central Command, “is being
told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.” Concerns
over US troops being given orders to fire on American citizens in the event of
mass gun confiscation first arose in 1995 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms,
California were given a survey as part of an academic project by Navy
Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the Marines if they
would, “Fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms
banned by the United States government.”
The survey
was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by
the tone of the question. The US Military has clearly outlined
innumerable civil emergency scenarios under which troops would be authorized to
fire on U.S. citizens. In July 2012, the process by which this could
take place was made clear in a leaked US Army Military Police training manual
for “Civil Disturbance Operations” (PDF) dating from 2006. Similar plans were
also outlined in an updated manual released in 2010 entitled FM 3-39.40
Internment and Resettlement Operations. The 2006 document outlines how
military assets will be used to “help local and state authorities to restore
and maintain law and order” in the event of mass riots, civil unrest or a declaration
of martial law.
On page 20
of the manual, rules regarding the use of “deadly force” in confronting
“dissidents” on American soil are made disturbingly clear with the directive
that a, “Warning shot will not be fired.” Given that second amendment
advocates are now being depicted as dangerous terrorists by the federal
government and local law enforcement, Garrow’s claim is sure to stoke
controversy given that Americans are seeing their gun rights eviscerated while
the federal government itself stockpiles billions of bullets.
Last week,
Gloversville Mayor Dayton King warned that any federal gun confiscation program
could lead to a “Waco-style standoff” in rural areas of America.
Comments:
I expect veterans groups will
respond to this news by continuing or resuming training and organizing for our
defense. I expect ALL State Militia Reserve
Units to do this. Further, I expect few Regular
Military commissioned and non-commissioned Officers will NOT obey these orders.
Older Vets will join in large numbers.
Gun store sales should soar if this news gets out and becomes common
knowledge. I have no doubt the Generals
will give the orders and their Colonels will arrest them.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea
Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment