Clinton Aide Scandal
Clinton Aide Huma Abedin Employment at State Department
Flouted the Law, 10/16/15, judicialwatch.org
Judicial Watch reported last month that State Department
documents indicate that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton personally
signed the authorization for Huma Abedin, her then-deputy chief of staff, to
become a special government employee (SGE). Any doubt that that this position
should have never been approved was erased today with JW's release of new
documents (http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/state-release-final-101315-jw-abedin-f-2013-08812/)
from the Department of State that include an email from the agency's top
financial disclosure official revealing that Abedin failed to produce important
financial transaction records of her husband, former Rep. Anthony Weiner, as
required by law before obtaining her position as a SGE in 2012. Despite the
lack of legally required transparency and accountability by Abedin and the
Obama/Clinton State Department, Abedin was also given a Top Secret security
clearance renewal in anticipation of her SGE position.
Your Judicial Watch uncovered these records as a result of
our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
(https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/citing-misconduct-and-misrepresentation-by-hillary-clinton-and-state-department-judicial-watch-asks-federal-court-to-reopen-lawsuit-seeking-information-on-top-clinton-aide-huma-abedin/)
that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Abedin
(Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State
(http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/huma-employment/) (No.
1:13-cv-01363)).
Just getting these records took persistence in the face of
fraud and obstruction by the Obama/Clinton gang. In February 2014, the State
Department assured Judicial Watch that it had searched several individual
offices of the department, including the office of the Executive Secretariat,
which would have included the Office of the Secretary of State. Relying upon
the State Department's representation that the agency conducted a reasonable
search - which Judicial Watch later learned to be untrue, Judicial Watch agreed
to dismiss its lawsuit on March 14, 2014. We were lied to, as we had no clue
about Hillary Clinton's separate email system at the time.
Thankfully, Judge Emmet Sullivan reopened the lawsuit on
June 19, 2015, in response to the revelations about Clinton's email games.
Our diligence and persistence uncovered the corruption
behind the Abedin "special" job appointment. These new records show
that Abedin had to be repeatedly reminded of the need for her financial records
to be included in the OGE Form 278 Executive Branch Personnel Public Financial
Disclosure Report
(https://ethics.od.nih.gov/forms/OGE-278-Dec-2011-automated.pdf) as part of her
termination agreement with the State Department. But, according to a June 5,
2012, email from State Department Financial Disclosures Chief Sarah Taylor,
Abedin failed to produce key sections of the records, even after her
appointment as a SGE had been approved on June 3, 2012.
On June 5, 2012, Taylor sent the following email to Heather
Samuelson and Marcela Green, both of the State Department's Financial
Disclosures Division, concerning Abedin's failure to complete the OGE 278 form
with the subject line "RE: disclosure questions:"
Her termination report is Incomplete, Schedule B, Part I and
II were left blank. Schedule C, Part II was left blank. I hope she provided all
of her spouse's assets. Marcella I believe told him, either Huma or her husband
called her yesterday indicating there were more assets. The documents I have do
not have the income information, only the value information. What was her date
of termination? She needs to be aware her termination report will be going up
on a DOS website for the public to view and it must be accurate.
Unbelievable, isn't it? Again, these questions are still
unanswered two days after Abedin gets the sweetheart patronage job.
The sections of the OGE 278 financial disclosures form that
Abedin and Weiner failed to complete were:
• Schedule
B, Part 1 - Transactions. Report any purchase, sale, or exchange by you, your
spouse, or dependent children during the reporting period of any real property,
stocks, bonds, commodity futures, and other securities when the amount of the
transaction exceeded $1,000. Include transactions that resulted in a loss.
• Schedule
B, Part 2 - Gifts, Reimbursements, and Travel Expenses. For you, your spouse
and dependent children, report the source, a brief description, and the value
of: (1) gifts (such as tangible items, transportation, lodging, food, or
entertainment) received from one source totaling more than $350 and (2)
travel-related cash reimbursements received from one source totaling more than
$350.
• Schedule
C, Part 2 - Agreements or Arrangements. Report your agreements or arrangements
for: (1) continuing participation in an employee benefit plan (e.g. pension,
401k, deferred compensation); continuation of payment by a former employer
(including severance payments); (3) leaves of absence; and (4) future
employment.
The core ethics disclosures required by law were simply
ignored by Hillary Clinton's protégé.
It gets worse. The records show that Abedin had a
pre-approved Top Secret (Critical Sensitive) clearance for her SGE position on
March 20, 2012. The "revalidation" of her security clearance was
directly tied to her pending SGE status. (The clearance document shows that
Abedin's original security clearance investigation and approval took place on
the same day - February 4, 2009.)
Just a few weeks ago
(http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/new-documents-huma-abedin/),
we released new records
(http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/state-release-091815-2/)
indicating that Abedin had failed to provide Weiner's full financial disclosure
records as required by law, despite repeated requests from State's Human Resources
and Financial Disclosures divisions. The records also indicate Clinton
personally signed the authorization for Huma Abedin, her then-deputy chief of
staff, to become a SGE. The documents also raised questions about whether
Abedin's position complied with federal law that prevents special government
positions created for work already performed by current employees.
To be clear, all these records have been produced only after
the State Department performed a second search, after the first search in 2014,
only produced eight pages.
Huma Abedin, with the direct help of Hillary Clinton,
obtained a sweetheart government job in violation of the law. The Obama State
Department tells us it has given us all the documents they have concerning the
Abedin employment controversy, which means that Abedin obtained her
"special" job despite her refusal to provide her basic financial
information and her agreements and arrangements for future employment. None of
this prevented Abedin from getting a scam position and - disturbingly - a
coveted Top Secret clearance.
Your Judicial Watch isn't the only one hot on the trail.
Politico
(http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/huma-abedin-consultant-state-091503)
recently reported, since June 2012, Abedin had been double-dipping, working as
a consultant to outside clients while continuing as a top adviser at State.
Abedin's outside clients included Teneo, a strategic consulting firm co-founded
by former Bill Clinton counselor Doug Band. According to Fox News
(http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/26/huma-abedin-faces-employment-questions/),
Abedin earned $355,000 as a consultant to Teneo, in addition to her $135,000
SGE compensation. The New York Times
(http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/nyregion/weiners-wife-huma-abedin-failed-to-disclose-consulting-work-done-while-a-state-dept-aide.html?_r=1)
reported "It is not clear how much Ms. Abedin was paid by Mrs. Clinton
privately, or from the Clinton Foundation and Teneo."
The Clinton, Inc. influence-peddling Teneo
(http://www.teneoholdings.com/about/) describes its activities as providing
"the leaders of the world's most respected companies, nonprofit
institutions and governments with a full suite of advisory solutions."
[Emphasis added] Outside of the U.S., it maintains offices in Dubai, London,
Dublin, Hong Kong, Brussels, Washington, and Beijing
(http://www.teneoholdings.com/locations/). Teneo was also the subject of
various investigative reports, including by the New York Times
(http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/politics/unease-at-clinton-foundation-over-finances-and-ambitions.html),
which raise questions about its relationship with the Clinton Foundation.
Politico reports
(http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/huma-abedin-teneo-clinton-foundation-email-213965)
that other State Department documents show that Abedin was asked to help both
the Foundation and Teneo in April 2012.
News is breaking today
(http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/10/16/source-fbi-probe-clinton-email-focused-on-gross-negligence-provision/)
that the FBI, despite more impeachable obstruction
(http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/us/politics/obamas-comments-on-clinton-emails-collide-with-fbi-inquiry.html)
from Barack Obama, is criminally investigating Hillary Clinton for violations
of the Espionage Act and obstruction of Justice. This is another remarkable
testament to the impact of JW's work. Our FOIA litigation forced both the
disclosure of the Clinton email system and the criminal investigation of her
email games - all of which could land Hillary Clinton in jail.
The FBI might want to follow our lead again and add the
Abedin job scandal into their investigations. Why were the documents withheld
from the public for years? Giving one's political operative a government job in
violation of law is a crime, too.
There may be more to come. There's little doubt that the
Hillary Clinton operation (which includes Abedin, who is now on the Clinton
campaign staff) is holding documents back. So Judicial Watch lawyers will be
requesting that discovery take place to determine whether all emails from the
clintonemail.com server have been returned to the State Department and have
been reviewed to determine whether they are responsive to our FOIA request.
This means potentially putting some of these individuals under oath.
So stay tuned...
No comments:
Post a Comment