Did the South Have
the Right to Secede From the North During the American Civil War?
One of the most challenging questions surrounding the
Civil War was whether the Southern states had the right to secede from the
Union. Although the constitutional question at issue appears resolved today,
perceptions differed at the time. Despite each side relying on the same
founding documents, the existence of a right to secede was interpreted in
widely divergent ways. Both unionists and secessionists asserted that their
preferred position was legal.
Founding Documents
Both the Articles of Confederation, adopted in 1781, and
the United States Constitution, ratified in 1789, established a union of
sovereign states under the governance of a federal system. This union was
widely understood by both the states and the federal government to be
voluntary, and the Constitution was interpreted to reinforce this perspective.
At the same time, the founding fathers, particularly Thomas Jefferson,
recognized the states' right to secede. Although he did not advocate the
exercise of that right, he acknowledged that the entitlement remained with the
states and was a right that continued throughout the initial drafts of the
Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and the Declaration of
Independence.
States' Rights
The concept of states' rights, which formed the
foundation of any right or entitlement to secede, was well-grounded in the
founding documents of the United States, although the entitlement to act upon
these rights remains a contentious issue. Further complicating the question of
states' rights is the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, which states that
the powers that are neither delegated to the states nor prohibited from the
states remain the states'. Confounding the question, however, is the fact that
when states' rights created issues contradictory to the Southern states'
positions, such as freed slaves in Northern states having the right to vote or
to assemble, the Southern states asserted that these rights undermined the
continuation of the United States as a union.
Slavery
A key issue surrounding the Southern states' right to
secede surrounds the existence of slavery. In the South, a series of
perceptions surrounding slave ownership contributed to its importance as a
defining principle. These perceptions included first the idea that slave
ownership represented class aspiration. Second, slave ownership reinforced the
idea of white supremacy prevalent throughout the South. And third, the
existence of slavery created economic benefits and opportunities that generated
profits for Southern slaveholders. The significance of slavery is no more
evident than in the words of William Preston, spoken when the South Carolina
delegates walked out of the Democratic National Convention in Charleston:
"Slavery is our King! Slavery is our Truth! Slavery is our Divine
Right!"
The Law Today
The question of a state's legal right to secede was
addressed in the 1869 Supreme Court decision of Texas v. White. In that
decision, the Supreme Court stated that beginning with the Articles of
Confederation the agreement between the states to form a union was to "be
perpetual." The court went so far as to state that when the states agreed
to "form a more perfect Union" there was nothing that more clearly
asserted the belief in their indissoluble unity. The significance of this
decision was reinforced by Justice Antonin Scalia, who in 2006 wrote that if
there was any single right decided by the Civil War it was that there is no
right for a state to secede from the union. This position, asserted by the
founding documents of the United States, remains the position the United States
and its Supreme Court maintain to this day.
http://people.opposingviews.com/did-south-right-secede-north-during-american-civil-war-3347.html
Founding Documents
Both the Articles of Confederation, adopted in 1781, and
the United States Constitution, ratified in 1789, established a union of
sovereign states under the governance of a federal system. This union was
widely understood by both the states and the federal government to be
voluntary, and the Constitution was interpreted to reinforce this perspective.
At the same time, the founding fathers, particularly Thomas Jefferson,
recognized the states' right to secede. Although he did not advocate the
exercise of that right, he acknowledged that the entitlement remained with the
states and was a right that continued throughout the initial drafts of the
Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and the Declaration of
Independence.
No comments:
Post a Comment