Obama puts U.S.
on 'fast track' to world government, 'Literally just one crisis away from that happening', by Leo Hohmann,
9/30/15
The United Nations
2030 Agenda endorsed by President Obama, Pope Francis and the U.N. General
Assembly brings the world one giant step closer to true global governance.
The U.N. document
approved Sunday in New York, “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development,” includes in its
preamble the call for a “new universal agenda” for all of humanity.
But one big question
looms. How does such an
ambitious plan get implemented?
The plan bypasses
Congress and the legislatures of the world’s other 193 nations. Yet, the heads
of state agreed to work toward implementation, largely through secret trade
deals and backroom bureaucratic rule-making, experts told WND.
Very few members of
Congress have likely even read the U.N. document that Obama has agreed to
implement, says one expert in globalism.
“The only thing they
are lacking right now is a sufficient crisis big enough to win enthusiastic
public support in America and other nations in the world for full-on global
governance,” says Paul McGuire, a Fox News and History Channel contributor and
co-author of the new release, “Babylon Code: Solving the Bible’s Greatest End Time Mystery.”
The U.N. document
focuses on ending poverty and gender inequality, combating climate change and
opening up borders to migrants and refugees.
“But, remember, the elite who are behind this
are experts at manufactured crisis and their motto is ordo ab chao,
which means ‘order out of chaos.’ This was a term coined by the Masonic leader
Albert Pike,” McGuire told WND. “The new global order will be birthed by either
a global financial crisis, the prospect of World War III involving Islam,
Russia, Ukraine, NATO, Iran, Syria and Israel and a manufactured climate-change
crisis.”
To address these
crises, world leaders at the U.N. put their stamp of approval on a 15-year
plan, the so-called 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development — a proposal some
observers believe could be the first step toward the global super state and
cashless society predicted by biblical prophets.
“The real agenda of
the globalist elite through all these ‘sustainable development’ and ‘social
justice’ programs are to create a new global state,” says McGuire.
His book, co-authored
with journalist Troy Anderson, takes an investigative approach to examining
end-times prophecies and the current state of the world in the epic battle
between good and evil.
“We read in the book
of Revelation that in the last days Babylon will return as a ‘born-again’ world
government, religion and economic system. What is happening now with the United
Nations is Babylon rising again before our very eyes.”
Cliff Kincaid,
director of the Accuracy in Media Center for Investigative Journalism, also has
his eye on Pope Francis and the Vatican.
While the media paid
great attention to the pope kissing babies and hugging adoring Americans, it
gave little if any coverage to the real story of his visit, which was to
endorse the U.N.’s march toward a new international order under the guise of
“sustainable development,” Kincaid says in a recent article for AIM.
This agenda promises
to radically affect the individual lives of ordinary Americans, yet they are
being kept in the dark about its details.
The stated purpose of
the U.N. “high panel’s” report is to “transform economies through sustainable
development.”
The only American on this
panel was John Podesta, former top climate-change adviser for Obama and now
chairman for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Podesta is also a
member in the elitist Trilateral Commission, founded in 1973 by David
Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, and founder of the George Soros-funded
Center for American Progress.
“In addition to
destroying the American system, the recommendations of this so-called
high-level body, especially on the matter of ‘climate action,’ could also have
a dramatic impact on the lives of people around the world, including the poor,
who need access to energy and real economic development to escape poverty,”
Kincaid writes.
According to Patrick Wood, author of “Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global
Transformation,” the whole
“sustainable development” meme is a ploy to replace capitalism and free
enterprise with a global socialist system based on resource allocation and
energy usage rather than on supply and demand and free-market activity.
Wood said the proposed
“transformation” of the world’s current economic system “for a completely
untried and untested one” is “dangerously absurd” and could make life worse for
the people that the U.N. and Roman Catholic Church are supposed to help.
“Any honest economist
would instantly balk at such Pollyannaish promises of utopia, and the American
public should do so as well,” Wood told Kincaid. “The fact is that these wild
promises of prosperity for all are merely the candy coating to deceive the
world into going along with its own economic destruction.”
And the pope is fully
on board with the U.N. plan to escort the world into global governance. Kincaid
observes:
“In a pitch for global
socialism, masked in flowery language, Francis, who insisted on his way to the
U.S. that he was not a liberal, said, ‘I would like all men and women of good
will in this great nation to support the efforts of the international community
to protect the vulnerable in our world and to stimulate integral and inclusive
models of development, so that our brothers and sisters everywhere may know the
blessings of peace and prosperity which God wills for all his children.’”
He adds that while the
pope says nice things about the poor, “the practical result of ditching
capitalism for socialism will be more poverty, suffering, and death.”
Journalist and retired
English professor Jerry B. Kane, writing about the 2030 Agenda in an article for Canada Free Press, notes that this new U.N. plan for humanity
is more sweeping than the former plan, known as Agenda 21, which dealt mostly
with the environment.
The preamble to the
2030 Agenda, which many see as the replacement for Agenda 21, specifically
calls for an overhaul of the world’s “three dimensions of sustainable
development,” which it lists as “the economic, social and environmental.”
“Nearly every nation
in the world is expected to sign on to the 2030 Agenda,” Kane writes. “But what
happens to the nations that won’t sign on or go along with the plan? Or better
yet, what happens to freedom of conscience, individual liberty, and free
enterprise in those nations that do go along?”
‘One crisis away’
The goal is to get
every nation to willingly sign onto the plan and thereby give up elements of
their national sovereignty, which could be done more easily in a time of
crisis, McGuire said.
“The U.N. vote is
about to put America and the world on the fast track to a one-world
government,” he told WND. “We are literally just one crisis away from that
happening. It could happen overnight, and I don’t think most people realize
this.”
In fact, the
Telegraph, a major British newspaper, reported this week that the IMF was warning of just such an event, with a “mass
default” in emerging markets where global corporations are exposed to weak
economic conditions.
The trigger could be
higher U.S. interest rates.
These corporations
have “gorged themselves on cheap debt,” the IMF warned. But the rug will
eventually be pulled out by the Federal Reserve, causing a cascading collapse.
Speaking before the
United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 28, Obama argued that it is necessary
for the U.S. to retreat as a world superpower so that global governance can
rise up in its place.
Obama rejected
arguments that “strong states must impose their will” or that “might makes
right” and “order must be imposed by force.”
But what are the
ideals in the U.N. charter that Obama proposes take the place of a superpower
America?
What will global
government look like?
For a clue on what
global government will look like, McGuire says the real agenda was exposed by
Lord Monckton, the former science adviser to Margaret Thatcher and now
an exclusive columnist for WND.
Monckton warned on
Oct. 14, 2009, that the true agenda of the U.N. climate treaty and Agenda 21 is
to create an all-powerful world government and to transfer wealth from Western
nations to Third World nations through the force of new U.N.-sponsored
international laws.
One of the ways to do
this redistribution is by allowing Third World refugees to migrate freely into
the industrialized nations of the West.
“Monckton summed it
all up when he said; the goal of the U.N. is to impose communist world
government on the world,” McGuire said.
The world is now at a
“tipping point” for this new system to be installed, he said.
“We see the world
being deliberately brought to the brink of a financial crisis that is created
through debt to the central banks in Europe and the Federal Reserve system in
the United States,” McGuire said. “The economies of the world have been
strategically impacted by trillions of dollars in debt, the slowing of economic
growth due to U.N. sustainable development policies and the impossible demands
of attempting to pay off these debts through higher taxes.”
These governments are
obligated to pay pensions, retirement programs and other benefits to their
people while their economies have been stagnating under the weight of socialist
economic policies.
The sovereign debt
crisis that started in Greece and Cypress will spread like a contagion through
Europe and the U.S. And the growing wealth disparity is creating conditions
where the people of the world, including the former American middle class, will
cry out for socialist-style economic policies.
As Christine Lagarde,
head of the IMF said, “a reboot of the global financial system is needed.” This
may include a new world currency and a cashless society.
Islam’s role in
creating new world order
To create a crisis
that enables their new global order to be implemented, McGuire believes the
elites have been stoking and manipulating the rise of worldwide Islam.
The Wahhabi sect,
which is the most militant branch of Sunni Islam, is heavily financed by Saudi
Arabia through its vast oil reserves, discovered near the Persian Gulf in 1939.
The al-Saud dynasty later made a deal with the Rockefeller oil companies and in
order for the dynasty to keep its power it had to agree to finance Wahhabism,
McGuire said.
Iran’s 1979 Islamic
revolution, created the rebirth of a militant Shia movement.
The growth of both
sects of militant Islam are connected to U.S., European, Russian and American
oil interests, McGuire said.
“Since the late 1970s
when Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, was helping train
Osama bin Laden, the hands of the globalists have been all over the growth of
militant Islam,” he said. “It appears Islam is being used as a destabilizing
force in both Europe and the United States designed to breakdown a cohesive
Judeo-Christian culture.”
Islam and liberal
Christianity ‘moving closer’
McGuire said he’s received
confidential reports from inside Germany regarding the flood of immigrants into
Europe. Many inside Germany believe this was pre-planned with the pope’s appeal
last year for Islam to move closer to Christianity.
More than 8,000
Muslims per day are entering Europe from various routes. They are creating
violence and chaos, and the U.N. has said there is no end in sight with regard
to the arrival of new migrants.
“Civil unrest is ready
to explode, and the people are crying out for some kind of police state to
manage the chaos, which appears to be the plan all along,” McGuire told WND.
McGuire believes the
U.N. plan using climate change as a global crisis goes all the way back to 1992
and the U.N.’s Earth Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil. A crisis as big as the world’s “climate” had to be manufactured and
hyped by the world’s media before the U.N. could put forth an aggressive agenda
calling for some kind of global government.
Using secret trade
deals
“Beginning at the
U.N.’s Earth Summit, the U.N. has used climate change, sustainable development
and Agenda 21 as a Trojan horse to grab power. During the Sept. 25-27 summit,
the U.N. presented its new 15-year plan to transform the world. What this
transformation is really all about is forcing sovereign nations, including the
United States, to surrender its rights under U.N. law and a U.N. global
government,” McGuire said.
And that’s where the
trade deals Congress allowed the Obama administration to secretly negotiate
come into play.
“All the secret trade
treaties that our government and other governments are signing are really all
about circumventing our U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights and placing the
United States and its citizens under the rule of U.N. law,” McGuire said.
“This is extremely
dangerous because U.N. law, despite using terms like ‘human rights,’ offers no
secure legal protection of the freedoms and rights we have guaranteed by the
Constitution and Bill of Rights,” he said. “The Declaration of Independence
states that we have been given, ‘certain inalienable rights by our Creator.’
This means that God, and not any human government, has given our rights and
freedoms to us and, therefore, no human government has the right to take them
away.”
The U.N. Convention on
Human Rights claims to offer protections for people’s rights.
The U.S. Bill of
Rights gives “freedom of religion,” “freedom of speech,” “freedom of the
press,” etc. The U.N. gives similar rights and freedoms that can be taken away
at any time and for any reason by human government.
“This is exactly the
same strategy that the planners of the European Union like Jean Monnet used in
destroying the rights and national sovereignty of individual European nations,”
McGuire said. “Monnet and others created simple ‘trade treaties’ regarding coal
and steel and would bury in these treaties subtle legal language that began the
process of ending the rights of the independent European nations.”
Through a succession
of such trade treaties, “the Europeans woke up one day and discovered they had
lost their basic rights and freedoms and they were now legally forced to
surrender their national sovereignty and accept the dictates of a European
Union, but it was all done by stealth,” he continued. “This is exactly what is
happening in the U.S. today with various trade treaties and the U.N. This is
one of the reasons why John Boehner is going to resign because he is secretly
signing away our constitutional rights along with other members of both
political parties. And when the American people finally wake up, it will too
late.”
When Obama said at the
United Nations, “We cannot look backward,” and emphasized that global
integration is an agenda that transcends the narrowly defined interests of
nation states, he was revealing his belief that a sovereign nation like America
must be brought down so a new global order can rise.
“President Obama is
not acting alone when he said at the U.N., ‘Unless we work with other nations
under the mantle of international law, we will not succeed,’” McGuire said.
“What Obama and prominent leaders in both the Republican and Democratic Parties
are currently in the process of doing is moving America away from the authority
of U.S. constitutional law and placing us under the authority of international
law through a series of secret trade treaties that no one can read.”
The late CBS
anchorman, Walter Cronkite, known as “the most trusted man in America,” said in
1999, that the U.S. must give the United Nations the full power of a world
government and both a police and military to enforce its international laws.
Cronkite also said that America must give up its sovereignty for this U.N.
world government to take over.
Leo Hohmann is a news
editor for WND. He has been a reporter and editor at several suburban
newspapers in the Atlanta and Charlotte, North Carolina, areas and also served
as managing editor of Triangle Business Journal in Raleigh, North Carolina.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/obama-puts-u-s-on-fast-track-to-world-government/
No comments:
Post a Comment