Obama now wants guns from
these 47,000 people, Not even Marines, air marshals,
congressmen, journalists and babies safe from scheme, by Chelsea Schilling,
12/7/15, WND
If the federal government doesn’t
want the 47,000 people on its No-Fly List to board airplanes, those individuals
should be banned from ever owning guns, President Obama argued in his
Sunday address from the Oval Office – but if his proposal ever becomes
law, America could see U.S. Marines, congressmen, journalists and even federal
air marshals mistakenly stripped of their firearms.
“To begin with, Congress should act
to make sure no one on a No-Fly List is able to buy a gun,” Obama said Dec. 6. “What
could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to but a
semi-automatic weapon? This is a matter of national security.”
But while San Bernardino,
California, terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook managed to fly to Pakistan and Saudi
Arabia under the radar of federal authorities in 2014, thousands
of innocent people have been mistakenly linked to U.S. terror watchlists. Some experts and critics contend the federal list process
contains many errors and relies on an overly broad standard of reasonable
suspicion.
‘No guns’ for congressmen, Marines
and feds?
Under Obama’s standard, even the
late-Sen. Ted Kennedy, an ardent advocate of gun control while he served in
Congress, would be blocked from purchasing a firearm.
In March 2004, Kennedy was stopped
three times at airports in Washington, D.C., and Boston. Airline agents told
the senator he couldn’t purchase a ticket because his name was on a list, according
to USA Today.
“If they have that kind of
difficulty with a member of Congress, how in the world are average Americans –
who are getting caught up in this thing – how are they going to be treated
fairly and not have their rights abused?” Kennedy asked then-Homeland Security
undersecretary Asa Hutchinson.
Kennedy wasn’t alone. Many other
unsuspecting Americans have had similar experiences. In 2014, Politico
reported Fox News contributor Steve Hayes
was listed in the federal terrorist database after he traveled to Istanbul for
a cruise.
“When I went online to check in with
Southwest, they wouldn’t let me. I figured it was some glitch,” he said. “Then
I got to the airport and went to check in. The woman had a concerned look on
her face. She brought over her supervisor and a few other people. Then they
shut down the lane I was in, took me to the side, told me I was a selectee and
scrawled [something] on my ticket.”
Hayes said a Southwest Airlines
agent later informed him that he was on the government’s terrorist watchlist.
Many children
under the age of five have generated false positives when
their names were listed among those on the No-Fly List. One
18-month-old baby was pulled off a JetBlue flight in 2012.
In
2003 , 71-year-old Milwaukee nun Sister
Virgine Lawinger had her travel plans interrupted.
In 2006, a U.S. Marine had his trip home to Minneapolis from Iraq
delayed when his name appeared on the list.
Rep.
John Lewis, D-Ga., said he was stopped
between 35 and 40 times in only a year after his name appeared on the
list in 2003.
Even members
of the Federal Air Marshal Service said
they were blocked from boarding planes in 2008 after their names appeared in
the database.
One marshal told the Washington
Times it’s “a major problem, where guys are denied boarding by the airline.”
“In some cases, planes have departed
without any coverage because the airline employees were adamant they would not
fly,” said the air marshal, who requested anonymity due to the nature of his
job. “I’ve seen guys actually being denied boarding.”
Another air marshal told the Times
one agent had been “getting harassed for six years because his exact name is on
the no-fly list.”
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., told
CNN Sunday that most people on the No-Fly List
don’t even belong there: “These are everyday Americans that have nothing to do
with terrorism. … The majority of people on the No-Fly List are often
times people that just basically have the same name as somebody else who
doesn’t belong on the No-Fly List.”
Even the left-leaning website Vox.com noted, “While the criteria for what sorts of ‘threats’ get placed
on the no-fly list is specific, the evidence that can be used to put someone on
the no-fly list – or any government watch list – is pretty thin. The government
is trying to predict whether people who have never committed any acts of
terrorism before will commit one now, and that involves a lot of what the
government calls ‘predictive judgments’ and its critics call guesswork.”
Terrorist Screening Database and the
No-Fly List
The FBI maintains the Terrorist Screening
Database, which was estimated in a
2009 Justice Department audit to
contain “more than 1.1 million known or suspected terrorist identities.”
In many cases, a single person on
the list was found to have more than one identity. According to leaked
government documents published by the Intercept, in 2013 there were 680,000 people actually on the list.
And more than 40 percent of those
names (280,000 people) were found to have “no recognized terrorist group
affiliation.” Tim Healy, an FBI veteran who runs the Terrorist Screening
Center, told
CBS News, “We don’t confirm anyone’s
existence on the watch list.”
The FBI says a person’s name may be
added to the federal watchlist “when there is reasonable suspicion that the person
is a known or suspected terrorist. To meet the reasonable suspicion standard,
nominating agencies must rely upon articulable intelligence or information
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably
warrants a determination that an individual is known or suspected to be or have
been knowingly engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of,
or related to terrorism or terrorist activities.”
The No-Fly List – a subset of the
Terrorist Screening Database – reportedly listed 47,000 people in 2013.
According
to the FBI: “Inclusion on the No Fly List
prohibits an individual who may present a threat to civil aviation or national
security from boarding a commercial aircraft that will fly into, out of, over,
or within United States airspace … Before an individual may be placed on the No
Fly List, there must be credible information that demonstrates the individual
poses a threat of committing a violent act of terrorism with respect to civil
aviation, the homeland, United States interests located abroad, or is
operationally capable of doing so.”
David Gomez, a former senior FBI
special agent, told the Intercept the watchlist system is “revving out of
control.” “If everything is terrorism, then nothing is terrorism,” he said.
Gomez expressed concern that the
database is being compiled based merely on a vague concept of reasonable
suspicion. “You need some fact-basis to say a guy is a terrorist, that you know
to a probable-cause standard that he is a terrorist,” Gomez
told the Intercept. “Then I say, ‘Build as big a file
as you can on him.’ But if you just suspect that somebody is a terrorist? Not
so much.”
Vox.com said the government’s
“reasonable suspicion” standard includes Facebook and Twitter posts.
“There’s also a way for the
government to add whole categories of people (like anyone who ‘traveled to a
particular country in a particular year) to the no-fly list temporarily – if it
has specific reasons for doing so,” Vox explained. “The ‘upgrade’ (as it’s
called) can last for 72 hours without official review, and can get extended
indefinitely every 30 days if ‘senior officials’ agree it’s necessary.
“The temporary ‘upgrade’ could be an
implementation nightmare in and of itself for making the no-fly list a no-gun
list. Would people who’d temporarily been put on the no-fly list be told they
couldn’t buy a gun, period? Would they be told to come back after the upgrade
had been lifted? Would the government put in place a way for an individual
person to exempt himself from the group terror ‘upgrade?’”
Anyone may request removal from the
terror watchlist by contacting the DHS
Traveler Redress Inquiry Program.
From fiscal year 2006 to 2008, the FBI processed an average of 2,710 watchlist
record removals each year.
TSA misses 73 people with suspected
terror links
While many innocent people continue
to find themselves on the federal watchlist, other individuals with
suspected terror ties are finding jobs in America’s “secure airport
areas.”
In another twist this week involving
the terror list, Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., told Boston
Public Radio that the
inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security found at least
six-dozen individuals “on the terrorist watch list that
were actually working at the Department of Homeland Security.”
Asked why he supported a GOP bill to
tighten screening requirements for Syrian and Iraqi refugees earlier this
month, Lynch said, “I have very low confidence based on empirical data that
we’ve got on the Department of Homeland Security. I think we desperately need another
set of eyeballs looking at the vetting process.”
Lynch mistakenly identified the
suspects as DHS employees. The 73 employees he referenced were airport and
airline employees screened by the Transportation Security Agency, or TSA.
Department of Homeland Security
Office of Inspector General finds TSA failed to identify 73 people with
terror-related codes when it vetted aviation workers (Photo: DHS screenshot)
WND contacted TSA to ask whether any
of the 73 workers on the terror watchlist carried firearms in the
line of duty, as would likely be the case for Federal Air Marshal agents,
who fall under TSA supervision. But a TSA spokesman didn’t answer the
specific question and instead provided several links to congressional
testimony.
Every
day, TSA is responsible for screening
an estimated 2 million air passengers at 441 airports across America. TSA
agents also screen airport and airline workers before they enter secure areas,
and the TSA conducts security background checks for those workers.
When a person wants to work at an
airport or for an airline, TSA checks the names against the Terrorist Screening
Database and performs criminal background and immigration status checks.
However, according to a June 2015
OIG report, TSA missed the 73 individuals with “terrorism-related category
codes because TSA is not authorized to receive all terrorism-related
information under current interagency watchlisting policy.”
http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/obama-now-wants-guns-from-these-47000-people/
No comments:
Post a Comment