Pharmaceuticals have made
the news a few times in the past year for extortion pricing of life-saving
drugs. First it was AIDS medication, and more recently EpiPens were the center
of attention.
But anyone who has filled
a prescription in the last half decade knows that price hikes aren’t limited to
these two cases. In fact, research has shown a sharp rise in the cost of
medication in the U.S. since 2007. So, what is really causing these hikes? Is
big pharma just pushing price points as far as they can, or are other factors
contributing?
Medical Spending
The classic response from
pharmaceutical companies has claimed that the cost of researching and
developing medication is what drives the prices at the drugstore. It turns out
that there may be some truth in that claim. Medical research is very expensive,
and the U.S. still contributes roughly half of all research spending across the
globe.
On top of that, the bulk
of U.S. spending really does come from private investment. Of the near $150
billion spent annually in the U.S., more than $70 billion comes from private
investors and pharmaceutical companies, while less than $50 billion comes from
government spending. The rest of the funding comes through various other
sources, such as non-profit research contributions.
Going back a few years
paints an even better picture. In 2007, private investment was over $80 billion
in the U.S., and American research accounted for more than half of all global
contributions. The past ten years have seen a 13 percent drop.
In the meantime, Asian
countries, mostly China, have picked up the slack. It should come as no
surprise that China surged in this market, just like many more in their recent
economic boom. Looking forward, the world might expect less spending coming
from the giant country, as their economic situation is tenuous at best.
It’s also worth noting
which countries are absent from increased research spending. Canada and the
bulk of the EU have seen almost no growth in spending for roughly 15 years.
Just as experts have been
explaining for the past 20 years, single-payer and universal health care
systems lead to stagnation. Without competition, providers aren’t able to push
earnings or profits, so there is never an incline in research. The result is
that free economies like America pick up the bill to literally save the lives
of the rest of the people on the planet.
Big Pharma
So far it looks like the
situation is global, complicated and out of the hands of the pharmaceutical
companies that have been so lambasted. They are not entirely without blame in
the situation. After all, the cut in U.S. spending has mostly been their
decision, and even though a lapse in Chinese spending might raise their global
rank, there are no signs that pharmaceuticals are planning to dramatically
increase research budgets anytime soon.
Remember how research
spending has mostly dropped since 2007? Part of that can be attributed to the
recession conditions, but healthcare was the industry that stayed most profitable
in America throughout the recession years.
What else changed since
then? In a word: Obamacare.
Restructuring the
insurance system had major impacts on how healthcare companies get paid. More
conditions and treatments were given mandatory coverage, and as a result,
pharmaceutical companies and other providers saw an opportunity to guarantee
their profits.
The reason the biggest
price hikes have been on life-saving medication—like the EpiPen—is precisely
because they are more likely to be covered. Of course, that leaves uninsured
persons completely without help and unable to afford medicine that would
otherwise keep them alive, and this is where the innocence of the medical
industry is stripped away.
The solution they found to
maintain profits and continue their research contributions was to exploit
insurance coverage at the real cost of human life.
There’s another trend that
further casts shade on these companies. Besides cutting investments in the
first place, there has also been a major shift in how they spend money. More
than half of all investment is now in late stage research, or research aimed at
human testing and marketing.
Early stage research is
when most of the scientific study happenings, breaking down root causes and
potential treatments of health problems. This shift in spending is further
demonstration that pharmaceuticals are choosing their bottom line over
advancing medicine.
So why is medicine
expensive?
The three biggest factors
are social health care countries that can’t pull their own weight in
contributions, the U.S. government changing how money is distributed in
healthcare and pharmaceutical companies choosing the bottom line over patient
care.
As dark as it all sounds,
and as reasonable as outrage is, the situation is far from desperate. An
educated people can use the court of public opinion to keep the big companies
in line, and several countries in Europe are making large strides to move away
from single-payer systems.
Regards, Ethan Warrick,
Editor Wealth Authority
Comments
This
article doesn’t answer the question completely. I agree that Big Pharma price
gouges life-saving drugs, because patients with life-threatening conditions are
desperate. I also think these drugs are a lot more expensive in the US, because
government allows them to price-gouge us.
I think
our costs are too high because conditions are over-treated to benefit
providers. Defensive medicine treatments are designed to protect providers from
malpractice lawsuits. Accurate diagnostic techniques are rarely used and cause
excessive testing costs.
Post-op
infections and in-hospital contracted conditions are not prevented or
effectively treated.
The US
needs a wake-up call to end the price-gouging in Healthcare like the Japanese
gave the US automakers in the 1970s. The fact that we’ve had no cures for real
diseases like polio since the 1950s and no life-saving drugs like antibiotics
since 1945 should tell everybody that the system is full of corruption. The FDA
protects Big Pharma’s monopoly powers to our detriment. Health providers whose
services are covered by printed money from the federal government have no
incentive to make patients well or prevent preventable conditions.
Simply
ensuring that you are taking 100% of your daily required vitamins and minerals
is the first responsibility of patients. The second is to avoid overmedicating.
Doctors
prefer to write prescriptions for unnecessary tests to be used as “fishing
trips” to see if there is anything to treat and receive payment for.
Insurance
costs are impacted with procedures that are not “medically necessary”.
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment