Scott Walker has
dropped out of the Republican presidential race, but many of his ideas still
deserve time in the spotlight. One such proposal from the Wisconsin governor is
an idea too wonkish for the press corps but too good to pass up for the U.S.
economy.
He vowed, if elected,
to repeal the Davis-Bacon Act, an 84-year-old law that makes federal
construction projects more expensive for taxpayers. This proposal is so
worthwhile that Congress should consider it when the Highway Trust Fund comes
up for debate.
Davis-Bacon has one of
the most despicable back stories of any law on the federal books. When it
passed in 1931, organized labor was upset that contractors were ignoring its
members in favor of more affordable employees, especially minorities.
William Green, then president of the American Federation of
Labor—half of the modern AFL-CIO—testified before Congress that “colored labor
is being brought in to demoralize wage rates.” New York Rep. Robert Bacon, one
of the act’s sponsors, was incensed at an Alabama contractor employing
African-Americans to build a hospital in his district.
Despite this disturbing history, Davis-Bacon is still beloved by
unions and their allies in Congress. No wonder: It mandates that private
contractors pay “prevailing wages”—typically the union wage in any given
area—on all federal construction projects that cost more than $2,000.
According to a 2008 study by the Beacon Hill
Institute, the prevailing wage set by the Labor Department is on average 22%
higher than the going market rate. This gives unionized contractors an inherent
advantage over low-cost competitors, especially in urban areas where
unionization rates are typically higher. It also results in roughly 10% higher
costs per construction project, which quickly adds up for the taxpayer. In 2013
the Congressional Budget Office estimated that repealing the law
would save $13 billion between 2015 and 2023—more than $1.6 billion in average
annual savings.
Businesses are also heavily burdened by the law’s compliance
requirements. The Institute for Justice estimated in 1993 that Davis-Bacon
costs construction companies roughly $190 million a year, which could have
sustained 31,000 new jobs. Both of these numbers have almost certainly grown in
the intervening two decades.
Minority communities would also see dramatic benefits. In a
legacy of the law’s racist history, Davis-Bacon continues to harm minorities,
especially African-Americans. Decades of research, including a noteworthy 1999 study by Stanford University’s Daniel Kessler and Harvard’s Lawrence
Katz, shows that the law has harmful effects on minorities in the construction
industry, whether through depressing their wages or limiting their job
opportunities. The reason is simple: Minority-owned contractors are generally
smaller and nonunionized and often struggle to compete for contracts covered by
Davis-Bacon.
The overwhelming evidence helps explain why multiple presidents
have temporarily suspended Davis-Bacon in times of “national emergency,”
starting with Franklin Roosevelt in 1934 to help kick off the New Deal. Richard
Nixon took similar actions in 1971 to combat widespread inflation. In
explaining his actions, Nixon noted that Davis-Bacon prevents “taxpayers from
getting their money’s worth” and harms “the construction worker himself” by
hindering job creation.
In 1992 George H.W. Bush suspended the law for similar reasons
in hurricane-stricken Florida, Louisiana and Hawaii, only to see Bill Clinton
reinstate it five months later in one of his first acts in the Oval Office.
Mr. Walker should be applauded for seeking to eliminate
Davis-Bacon. He has firsthand knowledge of how similar laws work at the state
level. Earlier this summer, he signed a state budget repealing Wisconsin’s
prevailing-wage law for local government construction projects. Indiana Gov.
Mike Pence went further in May by repealing his state’s law—known locally as
the “common construction wage”—for state and local projects. Both states join
18 others that have no prevailing-wage laws on their books. They now stand to
boost their economies and save significant sums for their taxpayers.
Congress would do well to follow these states’ examples and
repeal Davis-Bacon, and lawmakers don’t have to wait until after the 2016
election. Sen. Mike Lee (R., Utah) introduced the “Davis-Bacon Repeal Act” in
July, and Congress could vote to add this legislation to any bill that would
address the Highway Trust Fund’s constant fiscal woes. Congress will start
debating this issue next month and continue through next June when the fund
runs out of money.
Repealing Davis-Bacon wouldn’t make the fund solvent, but it
would be a major step in that direction. More important, it would also restore
fairness to the bidding process for federal construction projects, end a
discriminatory policy that continues to hurt minority communities, and save
billions of dollars for the American taxpayer. That’s something every
politician—not just presidential candidates—should support.
Mr. Koenig is senior policy adviser at Freedom Partners Chamber
of Commerce.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-disgraceful-labor-law-ripe-for-repeal-1443136899
No comments:
Post a Comment