U.S. Paid $1 Billion To Paris Agreement Green Fund – All
Other Nations Combined $0…Posted
on June 3, 2017 by sundance
The Paris Treaty was/is
always about distribution of economic wealth; and the convenient use of
“climate phrases” as branding instruments used to create political policy
favorable to multinational corporate interests who control the shifting of
economic wealth.
Listen to the responses
from participating EU corporate comptrollers discussing climate and the entire
purpose of the Paris Treaty becomes self-evident. Example: “The
preservation of our competitive position is the precondition for successful
climate protection. This correlation is often underestimated.”
Matthias Wissmann, President of German Auto Industry Group VDA - The
preservation of Germany’s competitive auto manufacturing position is contingent
upon the U.S. exporting its wealth and handcuffing itself to a faux-climate
treaty. Do not take my word for it, read Wissmann’s own interview. The Paris Treaty is nothing
about climate, and everything about economics and multinational corporate
interests.
Forbes on Fox had an
interesting discussion segment earlier today where some of the panel
participants explained and discussed this exact issue. The Paris
Climate Treaty was never about “climate” it was fundamentally about
“economics”.
The Paris Climate Treaty
has nothing to do with “climate” and everything possible to do with economics,
globalism and the controlled redistribution of economic wealth as constructed
through decades of advanced policies by multinational financial interests.
There are factually TRILLIONS of dollars at stake. The primary concern
for every affiliated entity surrounds economics, not climate. “Climate” issues are the
Trojan horse, the false ruse, the talking point, the scheme to get economic
systems in place -yes, political systems- to control the distributive flow of
larger economic wealth within all nations. Period.
What
ObamaCare was to our loss of healthcare individualism, so too is the Paris
Treaty a political tool to deconstruct national economic individualism. To understand the larger
objectives of the global and financial elite it is important to understand the
three-decade global financial construct they now seek to protect. Global
financial exploitation of national markets:
♦Multinational
corporations purchase controlling interests in various national elements of
developed industrial western nations.
♦The Multinational Corporations making the purchases are underwritten by massive global financial institutions, multinational banks.
♦The Multinational Banks and the Multinational Corporations then utilize lobbying interests to manipulate the internal political policy of the targeted nation state(s).
♦With control over the targeted national industry or interest, the multinationals then leverage export of the national asset (exfiltration) through trade agreements structured to the benefit of lesser developed nation states – where they have previously established a proactive financial footprint.
♦The Multinational Corporations making the purchases are underwritten by massive global financial institutions, multinational banks.
♦The Multinational Banks and the Multinational Corporations then utilize lobbying interests to manipulate the internal political policy of the targeted nation state(s).
♦With control over the targeted national industry or interest, the multinationals then leverage export of the national asset (exfiltration) through trade agreements structured to the benefit of lesser developed nation states – where they have previously established a proactive financial footprint.
The ‘America First’
Trump-Trade Doctrine upsets the entire construct of this multinational
export/control dynamic. Team Trump focuses exclusively on bilateral trade deals
with specific policy only looking out for the national interests of the United
States.
Under President Trump’s
Trade positions exfiltration of U.S. national wealth is essentially stopped.
This puts multinational corporations, globalists who previously took a
stake-hold in the U.S. economy with intention to export the wealth, in a
position of holding interest of an asset they can no longer exploit.
Multinational banks have
underwritten multinational corporations to own and control U.S. assets and industries.
The multinationals then hire K-Street Lobbyists, Tom Donohue (U.S CoC) etc., to
create/write the political policy which allows the exploitation and
exfiltration of the U.S. asset and U.S. industry. Climate change
political policy is part of that legislative tool.
President Trump has
STOPPED the entire system dead in its tracks. If you can see the ramifications,
understand how much they have already invested in this entire construct, you
can begin to understand the severity of the opposition to President Trump – and
can grasp reason for the inherent anger we are all witnessing.
Multinational
corporations and billionaire financiers use climate change as a tool toward
furtherance of collected global wealth. Their strategy is quite simple, and has
been played out for several cycles.
Create an institutional
trade instrument (housing financial bubble example), control it, expand the
financial use globally, drive the controlled pricing to an apex and reap the
financial rewards. Wash – Rinse – Repeat.
Their expressed holy
grail for ultimate human behavioral control is a global tax on all people more
commonly known as a “carbon-trading tax”. Just like ObamaCare, this
tax on personage first requires everyone to accept the assumption of why the
tax is needed.
A planetary tax on
personage, behavior and activity, through a market-based trade vehicle (Paris
Agreement), under U.N. exclusive control; which subverts the national economic
interests of
sovereign nations.
The “Carbon Trading”
fundamental financial instrument is the foundational block of the financial
interests behind modern climate change. The latest exhibition of a decades-long
series of international construct was the Paris Climate Change agreement.
REUTERS – Investors with more than $15 trillion of assets
under management urged governments led by the United States to implement the
Paris climate accord to fight climate change despite U.S. President Donald
Trump’s threats to pull out.
“As long-term
institutional investors, we believe that the mitigation of climate change is
essential for the safeguarding of our investments,” according to the letter
signed by 214 institutional investors and published on Monday.
“We urge all
nations to stand by their commitments to the Agreement,” it said. Signatories
of the letter included the California Public Employees Retirement System and
other pension funds from Sweden to Australia. (read more)
Why are multinational
banks, and multinational corporations, and multinational investment groups and
pension funds so desperate to retain the Paris agreement?
Simple, those funds have
been used by the multinational interests to create the entire system.
These funds provided the seed money for the entire financial
scheme. Ask yourself….… Where exactly in the U.S. budget did this
little $1 billion line-item expenditure come from?
Again, as we have done
in the past, we draw attention to the secret meeting in Sea Island Georgia in 2016 when the billionaire vested participants
gathered with the political class to discuss how they could stop candidate
Donald J Trump.
2016 -Billionaires, tech CEOs and top members of the
Republican establishment flew to a private island resort off the coast of
Georgia this weekend for the American Enterprise Institute’s annual World
Forum, according to sources familiar with the secretive gathering.
The main
topic at the closed-to-the-press confab? How to stop Republican front-runner
Donald Trump. (The meeting was not planned to be a strategy session on how to
stop the GOP front-runner, but rather evolved into one, as a subsequently obtained agenda makes
clear.)
Apple CEO Tim
Cook, Google co-founder Larry Page, Napster creator and Facebook investor Sean
Parker, and Tesla Motors and SpaceX honcho Elon Musk all attended.
So did Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), political guru Karl Rove, House
Speaker Paul Ryan, GOP Sens. Tom Cotton (Ark.), Cory Gardner (Colo.), Tim Scott
(S.C.), Rob Portman (Ohio) and Ben Sasse (Neb.), who recently made news by saying he “cannot support Donald Trump.”
Along with
Ryan, the House was represented by Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Fred
Upton (Mich.), Rep. Kevin Brady (Texas) and almost-Speaker Kevin McCarthy
(Calif.), sources said, along with leadership figure Cathy McMorris Rodgers
(Wash.), Budget Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-Ga.), Financial Services
Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (Texas) and Diane Black (Tenn.).
Philip
Anschutz, the billionaire GOP donor whose company owns a
stake in Sea Island, was also there, along with Democratic Rep. John Delaney,
who represents Maryland. Arthur Sulzberger, the publisher of The New York
Times, was there, too, a Times spokeswoman confirmed.
“A specter
was haunting the World Forum—the specter of Donald Trump,” (read
more)
Pay attention to the voices now shouting
opposition to President Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Treaty and
you will identify those same oppositional voices who assembled in all economic
matters prior to this moment in 2017. Their vested interests center around the
economics, not “the climate”.
At
first glance, the scope of this entire scheme seems so all encompassing it may
seem like a political conspiracy theory. However, this is a conspiracy
reality.
President
Trump is very smart about the long-term ramifications to this ‘treaty’. If the
heavily influenced industrialized nations commit themselves to this agreement
they will be anchoring their economic manufacturing base within a tiered system
of ridiculously burdensome regulations and agreements.
The
strategic benefit to the United States will stem from not participating in the
regulatory stranglehold that accompanies the agreement. Obviously all nations
that compete with the U.S on international trade agreements would, for once, be
at a disadvantage; and our American manufacturing and industrial base would be
able to take strategic advantage.
This
is why those nations will never complete their promises under the Paris
Agreement, they can’t and they won’t.
In
larger terms back in the U.S., President Trump’s refocused policy objectives
remove the political benefit from Wall Street and places it back with Main
Street, reversing a three decade long shift. This approach is adverse to the
interests of the globalists.
President
Trump’s economic team are well aware of the strategic advantage is walking away
from the Paris Climate Treaty. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Commerce
Secretary Wilbur Ross, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and their
entire economic and financial team know what is needed to reverse the decades-long
construct and defeat the interests of the global elites.
No comments:
Post a Comment