March 4, 2014 by Brandon Smith
When one studies history, all events seem to
revolve around the applications and degenerations of war. Great feats of human
understanding, realization and enlightenment barely register in the mental
footnotes of the average person. War is what we remember, idealize and
aggrandize, which is why war is the tool most often exploited by oligarchy to
distract the masses while it centralizes power.
With the exception of a few revolutions, most
wars are instigated and controlled by financial elites, manipulating
governments on both sides of the game to produce a preconceived result. The
rise of National Socialism in Germany, for instance, was largely funded by
corporate entities based in the U.S., including Rockefeller giant Standard Oil,
JPMorgan and even IBM, which built the collating machines used to organize Nazi
extermination camps, the same machines IBM representatives serviced on site at
places like Auschwitz. As a public figure, Adolf Hitler was considered a joke
by most people in German society, until, of course, the Nazi Party received
incredible levels of corporate investment. This aid was most evident in what
came to be known as the Keppler Fund created through the Keppler Circle, a
group of interests with contacts largely based in the U.S.
George W. Bush’s grandfather, Prescott Bush,
used his position as director of the New York-based Union Banking Corporation
to launder money for the Third Reich throughout the war. After being exposed
and charged for trading with the enemy, the case against Bush magically
disappeared in a puff of smoke, and the Bush family went on to become one of
the most powerful political forces in America.
Without the aid of international
conglomerates and banks, the Third Reich would have never risen to power.
The rise of communism in Russia through the
Bolshevik Revolution was no different. As outlined in Professor Anthony
Sutton’s book Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution with vast detail and
irrefutable supporting evidence, it was globalist financiers that created the
social petri dish in which the communist takeover flourished.
The two sides, National Socialism and
communism, were essentially identical despotic governmental structures conjured
by the same group of elites. These two sides, these two fraudulent ideologies,
were then pitted against each other in an engineered conflict that we now call
World War II, resulting in an estimated 48 million casualties globally and the
ultimate formation of the United Nations, a precursor to world government.
Every major international crisis for the past
century or more has ended with an even greater consolidation of world power
into the hands of the few, and this is no accident.
When I discuss the concept of the false
left/right paradigm with people, especially those in the liberty movement, I
often see a light turn on, a moment of awareness in their faces. Many of us
understand the con game because we live it day to day. We see past the
superficial rhetoric of Republican and Democratic party leadership and take note
of their numerous similarities, including foreign policy, domestic defense
policy and economic policy. The voting records of the major players in both
parties are almost identical. One is hard-pressed to find much difference in
ideology between Bush and Barack Obama, for example; or Obama and John McCain;
or Obama and Mitt Romney, for that matter.
When I suggest, however, that similar false
paradigms are used between two apparently opposed nations, the light fades, and
people are left dumbstruck. Despite the fact that globalist financiers shoveled
capital into the U.S., British, German and Soviet military complexes all at the
same time during World War II, many Americans do not want to believe that such
a thing could be happening today.
In response, I present the crisis in Ukraine
versus the crisis in Syria.
Ukraine Versus Syria
It seems as though much of the public has
already forgotten that at the end of 2013, the U.S. came within a razor’s edge
of economic disaster — not to mention the possibility of World War III. The war
drums in Washington were thundering for “intervention” in Syria and the
overthrow of Bashar Assad. The only thing that saved us, I believe, were the
tireless efforts of the independent media in exposing the darker motives behind
the Syrian insurgency and the bloodlust of the Obama Administration. The
problem is that when the elites lose one avenue toward war and distraction,
they have a tendency to simply create another. Eventually, the public is so
overwhelmed by multiple trigger points and political powder kegs that they lose
track of reality. I often call this the “scattergun effect.”
The crisis in the Ukraine is almost a carbon
copy of the civil war in Syria, culminating in what I believe to be the exact
same intent.
The Money
Money from globalist centers has been flowing
into the Ukrainian opposition since at least 2004, when the Carnegie Foundation
was caught filtering funds to anti-Russian political candidate Viktor
Yushchenko, as well as to the groups who supported him.
The Ukrainian Supreme Court called for a
runoff due to massive voter fraud and the rise of the pro-Western Orange
Revolution, determining the winner to be Yushchenko over none other than Viktor
Yanukovych. Yanukovych went on to win the 2010 elections, and the revolution
returned to oust him this year.
It has been discovered that the current
revolution has also been receiving funds from NATO and U.S. interests, not just
from the State Department, but also from billionaires like Pierre Omidyar, the chairman of eBay and the new boss of journalist
Glen Greenwald, the same journalist who is now famous for being the first to
expose National Security Agency documents obtained by Edward Snowden.
Much of the monetary support from such
financiers was being funneled to men like Oleh Rybachuk, the right-hand man to
Yanukovych during the Orange Revolution and a favorite of neoconservatives and
the State Department in the U.S.
The International Monetary Fund has also jumped at the chance to
throw money at the new Ukrainian regime, which would prevent default of the
country and allow the opposition movement to focus their attentions on Russia.
The revolution in Syria was also primarily
driven by Western funds and arms transferred through training grounds like
Benghazi, Libya. There is much evidence to suggest that the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was designed to
possibly cover up the arming of Syrian rebels by the CIA, who had agents on the
ground who still have not been allowed to testify in front of Congress.
After this conspiracy was exposed in the
mainstream, globalist-controlled governments decided to openly supply money and
weapons to the Syrian insurgency, instead of ending the subterfuge.
The ‘Rebels’
Some revolutions are quite real in their
intent and motivations. But many either become co-opted by elites through
financing, or they are created from thin air from the very beginning. Usually,
the rebellions that are completely fabricated tend to lean toward extreme
zealotry.
The Syrian insurgency is rife with, if not
entirely dominated by, men associated with al-Qaida. Governments in the U.S.
and Israel continue to support the insurgency despite their open affiliation
with a group that is supposedly our greatest enemy. Syrian insurgents have been
recorded committing numerous atrocities, including mass execution, the torture
of civilians and even the cannibalism of human organs.
The revolution in Ukraine is run primarily by
the Svoboda Party, a National Socialist (fascist) organization headed by Oleh
Tyahnybok.
So far, the opposition in Ukraine has been
mostly careful in avoiding the same insane displays of random violence that
plagued the Syrians’ public image. It is important to remember though that
mainstream outlets like Reuters went far out of their way in attempts to
humanize Syrian al-Qaida. Their methods were exposed only through the vigilance
of the independent media. With the fascist Svoboda in power in the Ukraine, I
believe it is only a matter of time before we see video reports of similar
atrocities; but at that point, it may be too late.
John McCain?
I am now thoroughly convinced that John
McCain is a ghoul of the highest order. He claims to be conservative yet
supports almost every action of the Obama Administration. He is constantly
defending anti-Constitutional actions by the Federal government, including the
Enemy Belligerents Act, which was eventually melded into the National Defense
Authorization Act; NSA surveillance of U.S. citizens; and even gun control.
And for some reason, the guy keeps showing up
before or during major overthrows of existing governments. McCain was in Libya during the coup against Moammar Gadhafi.
McCain showed up to essentially buy off the rebels in Tunisia.
McCain hung out with al-Qaida in Syria.
And, what a surprise, McCain met with the
Ukrainian opposition movement just before the overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych.
Why McCain? I have no idea. All I know is, if this guy shows up in your
country, take cover.
Russia In The Middle
The great danger in Syria was not necessarily
the chance of war with Assad. Rather, it was the chance that a war with Assad
would expand into a larger conflagration with Iran and Russia. Russia’s only
naval facility in the Mideast is on the coast of Tartus in Syria, and Russia
has long-standing economic and political ties to Syria and Iran. Any physical
action by the West in the region would have elicited a response from Vladimir
Putin. The mainstream argument claims that the threat of Russian intervention
scared off Obama, but I believe the only reason war actions were not executed
by the White House and the globalists was because they didn’t have even minimal
support from the general public. For any war, you need at least a moderate
percentage of the population to back your play.
In Ukraine, we find the globalists creating
tensions between the West and the East. Russia’s most vital naval base sits in
Crimea, an autonomous state tethered to the Ukrainian mainland. Currently,
Russia has flooded Crimea with troops in response to the regime change in
Ukraine. The new Ukrainian government (backed by NATO) has called this an
“invasion” and an act of war, while Western warmongers like McCain and Lindsay
Graham spread the propaganda meme that Russia made such a move only because
Putin believes the Obama Administration to be “weak.”
Clearly, the idea here is to engineer either
high tensions or war between Russia and the United States. Syria failed to produce
the desired outcome, so the Ukraine was tapped instead.
The False Paradigm and The Globalist
Chessboard
So far, I have outlined what appears to be a
correspondence of conspiracy between Syria and the Ukraine and how each event
has the continued potential to trigger regional conflict or world war. But is
this conspiracy one-sided? Are only the West and NATO being manipulated by
globalists to box in Russia and provoke a conflict? And what do globalists have
to gain by sparking such disaster?
As with every other catastrophic war, the
goal is the erasure of sovereign identity while consolidating of economic,
political and social power. It is not enough that global financiers dominate
the banking industry and own most politicians; they want to transform the
public psyche. They want us to ask them for global governance. This manufacture
of consent is often achieved by pitting two controlled governments against each
other and then, in the wake of the tragedy, calling for global unification. The
argument is always presented that if we simply abandoned the concept of nation
states and reform under a single world body, all war would “disappear.”
The question is whether Russia’s Putin is
aware of the plan. Is he a part of it?
What I do know is that Putin has, a number of
times in the past, called for global control of the economy through the IMF and
the institution of a new global currency using the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDR).
Loans from the IMF are what saved Russia from
debt default in the late 1990s. And Putin has recently called for consultations
with the IMF concerning Crimea. Remember, this is the same IMF that is working to fund his opponents in Western Ukraine.
Bottom line, if you believe in national
sovereignty and decentralization of power, Putin is not your buddy. Once again,
we have the globalists injecting money into both sides of a conflict. Global
governance of finance and money creation ultimately means global governance of
everything else.
Is a war being created through the false
paradigm of East versus West in order to pave the road for global government?
It is hard to say if the Ukraine will be the final trigger; however, the
evidence suggests that if a conflict occurs, regardless of who “wins” such a
nightmare scenario, the IMF comes out on top.
Imagine you are playing a game of chess by
yourself. Which side wins at the end of that game: black or white? The answer
is it doesn’t matter. You always win when you control both sides.
Source:http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/04/ukraine-crisis-just-another-globalist-engineered-powder-keg/
Brandon Smith is the founder of the
Alternative Market Project, an organization designed to help you find
like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network
and construct communities for barter and mutual aid. Join Alt-Market.com today
and learn what it means to step away from the unstable mainstream system and
build something better. You can contact Brandon Smith at:
brandon@alt-market.com 
No comments:
Post a Comment