Conservative social media is a very depressing place these days. It’s not just all the people on the same side hurling hate at each other. It’s the fragmenting of a once united movement into candidate partisan groups that circulate talking points and fight culture wars against ‘outsiders’.
This isn’t the Tea
Party. It’s little cults of personality around candidates. It’s cultural groups
forming around people, signaling insiders and outsiders, the righteous and the
infidels.
This isn’t about Trump.
It’s about all the candidates who have attracted passionate followings.
Conservative social media these days often consists of these partisans having
it out.
I don’t know who the
winner of all this is, but it isn’t going to be the things we believe in.
What was great about the
Tea Party was that it was skeptical about politicians. It said, support the
policies we care about or we’ll kick you out. Now it’s support a candidate and
excuse their policies.
This isn’t about who we
should support. It’s about what we should support.
Every Republican
presidential candidate has serious flaws on the major issues. Yes, every single
one of them.
And that’s normal. It’s
the way politics works. It’s the way politicians work. (Running for political
office means you’re a politician, even if you haven’t held political office
before.) It’s the way people work.
There are no perfect
candidates. It’s why the job of people like us is to hold politicians
accountable instead of being their shills. That doesn’t mean not voting. It doesn’t
mean not supporting a candidate.
It means supporting
candidates realistically by putting ideas first and politicians second.
It means acknowledging
that your favorite candidate has flaw X and pushing him to do better. It means
supporting him or her because of their policies, not because he or she seems
like the ‘one’.
Passion is fine in
romance, it’s bad in politics. Politicians, unlike husbands and wives, always
cheat. They’re surrounded by advisers who have a lot more influence on them
than you do. They have donors and companies and agendas orbiting around them.
Their life is different than your life.
And if they win, their
life will be so radically different than yours that they just won’t understand.
We’re not going to have
a conservative revolution by electing the perfect candidate. Three elections
full of disappointments should have shown that already. If we’re going to have
one of those, it will be because we have a movement of ideas that can’t be
hijacked by anyone with an angle.
I’m not asking you not
to support candidate X. I loathe the idea of seeing Jeb Bush up on the podium
with Hillary Clinton more than eating used rubber tires. But you might just
want to consider the possibility that Jeb Bush’s path to the nomination might
be through your favorite candidate and that yelling all day at other
conservatives does nothing except open a path for him to get there.
Romney won because there
was no consensus conservative opposition candidate. It wasn’t for lack of
different potential candidates and their supporters yelling at each other and
smearing each other. None of that yelling did anything except clear a path for
Romney to the nomination. And then conservatives could self-righteously stay
home while Obama grinned at another victory.
We don’t need another
replay of 2012.
If we put politicians
first. We lose. If we put ideas first, then win or lose, we build a movement.
When we put ideas first,
politicians compete to adopt them. That’s what happened with opposition to
ObamaCare. It’s what happened with immigration.
Putting ideas first puts
us in charge. Putting politicians first puts us right back where we started.
There’s a big difference
between supporting a politician and believing in a politician. Belief should be
saved for ideas, not for people running for office. When you believe in a
politician, you lose sight of the ideas we are fighting for. You stop asking
questions and stop holding them accountable.
And then you get Hoped
and Changed on.
No politician can save
us. No politician will save us. Fighting for the right ideas just might.
It’s fine to look back
on a Ronald Reagan with rose colored glasses. Movements need ideal models and
the best ones are out of office. It’s dangerous to do that with people who are
actually in power because it blinds us to their weaknesses and mistakes. It
weakens our fight for what’s right.
None of the candidates
in this race is absolutely the 100 percent right one. Some of them may be close
enough for government work. And your view and the view of the guy next to you
may vary. The right way to tell is by looking at their track records and what
they actually support in the cold light of day.
If we don’t do that, if
we make excuses for them, then they may get somewhere, but we never will.
If we want to change
America, we have to change politicians instead of letting them change us. If
we’re not skeptical of the politicians we support, we will keep on being
fooled, waking up to wonder why we were fooled and then going through the same
cycle as many times as it takes.
http://politichicks.com/2015/08/daniel-greenfield-believe-in-ideas-not-politicians/
1 comment:
Amen. Preach it, Brother! I realize that a *little* rivalry among R's is part of the process but I'd like to see more coalitions too.
This morning my dream ticket was still Carson/Paul. After reading a Carson statement on Joemiller.us, I think it's definitely Paul/Carson. The race is still on. May the most fiscally conservative, individually non-interfering candidate win.
Post a Comment