The past few years have been marked by Obama releasing new
regulation after new regulation designed to increase the price of low-cost,
readily-available fuel so that higher-cost, less-available alternatives become
economically viable. The resulting higher electricity costs represent the most
regressive form of regulatory taxation imaginable as the less fortunate have
almost no way, short of being cold, of avoiding the costs.
The stated objective of lowering carbon emissions might make
sense if these very regulations weren’t projected to have the perverse effect
of encouraging the continued and expanded burning of these fuels in countries
with significantly lower environmental standards while costing hundreds of
thousands of American
jobs.
When coupled with the Obama Administration’s goal of
establishing a Trans-Pacific Partnership that will encourage outsourcing manufacturing
to nations with virtually non-existent environmental protections, the net
result would be fewer well-paying jobs here at home to help raise the middle
class and more pollution worldwide.
But this may be considered an esoteric argument. One Obama EPA
regulation that would have an obvious devastating impact on the very poor is
the EPA’s rule on residential wood heaters. This regulation would make the cost
of manufacturing heaters that burn wood prohibitively expensive denying
consumers a low-cost means to safely heat their homes using wood.
In spite of the belief of those who cash government
paychecks every other week, many people in our nation depend upon burning wood
for heat in the winter even in the affluent Washington, D.C.
area. Nationally, one
in ten homes depends upon wood heat in some form
with just under two percent using it as their primary source.
The need is so great that the men at Chesapeake Church in
Calvert County, Maryland, spend a couple of weekends in the late fall and
winter chopping and delivering wood to those who depend upon burning that wood
to stay warm.
This is not a vanity, return-to-the-rustic-days-of-old
crackpot fantasy of better living that entices Birkenstock-wearing enviros to
cook and heat with wood. No, it is survival for people who find themselves
struggling to put food on the table.
Yet, the elitists at the EPA are trying to regulate safe,
wood-burning heaters out of existence, leaving the poor to use dangerous
alternatives to survive sub-freezing temperatures.
Fortunately, Representative David
Rouzer (R-N.C.) has introduced legislation
to repeal this War on the Poor regulation saying, “The federal government has
no business telling private citizens how they should heat their homes.”
It is expected that Rouzer will be working with his
colleagues in the House in September to attach language to the upcoming
government funding bill which will stop the wood-burning heater rule in its
tracks.
With winter on the way, Congress needs to act to protect the
less fortunate by allowing them to choose affordable alternatives to safely
heat their homes. The only better option would be to force the EPA Administrator
Gina McCarthy to trade places for a few weeks in February with those who depend
upon wood heat in sub-freezing temperatures and see if she changes her mind
about her Agency’s attempt to force the poor to sacrifice basic necessities on
the altar of climate change.
The author is the president of
Americans for Limited Government.
http://netrightdaily.com/2015/08/obamas-war-on-the-poor-continues/
Comments
Comments
The worst policy has been excessive immigration
during a deep jobs recession. The poor
have taken a severe beating at the hands of Obama and the insular pinheads who
have been clinging to job-killing policies.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment