As the choppy waters of September 2015 move ashore, all eyes will be on Pope Francis’ visit to the United States, jittery stock markets and signs in the heavens.
Francis is expected to
enthusiastically endorse a new
U.N. document that promises to wipe
out poverty by 2030 by reordering the world economy along the lines of socialist
principles. The document, titled “Transforming Our World: 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development,” also seeks to “strengthen universal peace” and usher
in a new era of shared prosperity.
The pope’s visit marks just one in a series of
historic and potentially prophetic events during the month of September.
- The climax of the biblical Sabbath year known as the Shemitah occurs on Sept. 13, along with a partial solar eclipse.
- The largest-ever military exercise, Jade Helm, concludes Sept. 15, while the world’s most ambitious scientific experiment is taking place all month at the CERN Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, Switzerland.
- Congress is supposed to vote on Obama’s Iran nuclear deal by by Sept. 17.
- The 266th pope arrives on Sept. 23, the 266th day of the year, which also happens to be Yom Kippur or the Jewish Day of Atonement, and the beginning of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, also known as “the Feast of the Sacrifice.”
- Francis will be the first pope to address a joint session of Congress Sept. 24.
- Francis delivers the keynote speech Sept. 25 to the U.N. sustainability summit in New York.
- On Sept. 28, the fourth and last of the “blood moons” takes place on the biblical Feast of Tabernacles.
Short of a global economic collapse, the U.N.’s
rollout of its new agenda for sustainable development could have the most
far-reaching impact of all these events.
“Basically they are
rebooting Agenda 21,” said Tom DeWeese, president and founder of the American Policy Center, and they are calling on the world’s most
visible religious leader to promote the agenda.
The U.N. 2030 Agenda includes 17 goals that aim
for the re-ordering of all human activity.
Despite the failure of Agenda 21 to “end
poverty,” the pope and the U.N. will ask 193 national leaders to go home from
the Sept. 25-27 summit and promote the new U.N. plan to usher in its planned
global utopia, DeWeese said.
“These same NGOs (who
failed to end poverty through Agenda 21) are headed to New York City to
announce their new 2030 Agenda to ‘Transform the World,’” he said. “The preamble to the document says ‘All countries and all
stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan.’”
But unlike 1992, when nobody was paying much
attention as Agenda 21 was rolled out at the U.N. Earth Summit in Rio De
Janeiro, Brazil, all eyes will be on the pope as he sings the praises of the
new U.N. plan on Sept. 25, DeWeese said.
DeWeese and others expect a massive promotional
campaign to combat climate change. That’s where the pope comes in. He will wrap
the sustainability principles in the verbiage of social justice and helping the
poor, perhaps even citing Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, encouraging other world
religious leaders to follow his lead in embracing the U.N. prescription for
mankind.
The ‘overthrow’ of capitalism
But what is “sustainable development?”
Patrick Wood, an
economist and author of “Technocracy
Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation,” says it’s clear the U.N. and its supporters
see sustainable development as more than just the way to a cleaner environment.
They see it as the vehicle for creating a long-sought new international
economic order, or “New World Order.”
Wood’s new book traces the modern technocracy
movement to Zbigniew Brzezinski, David Rockefeller and the Trilateral
Commission in the early 1970s.
Wood says their goal is the overthrow of
capitalism and the free enterprise system on a global scale.
He points to Christiana
Figueres, the U.N.’s top climate change official, who admitted as much in a comment
earlier this year.
“This is probably the most difficult task we
have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic
development model, for the first time in human history,” Figueres, who heads up
the U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, told reporters in February.
“This is the first time in the history of
mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a
defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been
reigning for the at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution,” Figueres
said.
Francis, as the first Jesuit pope, is well known
for his socialist leanings.
His statements in his encyclical about the need
for global governance to combat “climate change” must be looked at in the
context of the pope’s background and announced priorities.
‘A New World Order based on socialism’
Author Tom Horn points out that Father Malachi
Martin predicted in his book “The Jesuits: The Society of Jesus and the
Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church,” what might happen if a Jesuit ever gets
control of the Vatican.
As a Jesuit himself and
a longtime Vatican insider, Martin, who died in 1999, had hoped that what he
predicted would never come to pass, but it is becoming apparent that his
predictions are playing out exactly as he feared they would, Horn said in a
recent commentary
on SkyWatch TV.
“He said there was a secret war between the
Jesuits and the other Catholic priests to take control of the Roman Catholic
Church and the Vatican in particular,” Horn said. Traditionalists such as
Cardinal Raymond Burke have been demoted by Francis.
Horn believes the pope’s recent encyclical on
climate change and the reshuffling of key Vatican leaders may have something to
do with what’s about to occur on the global stage.
Malachi (Martin) said the Jesuits would use the
Vatican, because it’s not like any other Christian denomination,” Horn said.
“It’s got 90 ambassadors parked there on any day. It’s got political
relationships with most of the nations of the world, and Malachi said that’s
why the Jesuits wanted to seize control of the Vatican, so they could use it as
a machine. He said that would give assistance to the rise of a New World Order,
and he very specifically said they would use it to do the things that Pope
Francis is doing now – a New World Order based on socialism,
Marxism – and that they would work in tandem ultimately with the
rise of the antichrist for the implementation of the objectives of the
antichrist.”
If they succeed in doing away with capitalism,
which Figueres openly stated was the goal, the question is, what will replace
it?
“I say it’s technocracy,” Wood said. “They say
it’s the ‘green economy’ and ‘sustainable development.’”
But regardless of what you call it, the U.N.
plan calls for a centrally managed economy, more regulations of human activity,
less freedom, he says.
“If the world continues on this trajectory, we
will lose everything that sustains any semblance of individual liberty and
freedom,” he said. “Someone else will decide what to manufacture, how much to
make, who and how much an individual may purchase, and at what cost. Someone
else will tell you where you can work, for how long, at what wage. Someone else
will tell you where you can live, how big it will be, how many children you can
have and where you will send them for indoctrination. There will be no private
property rights, no ability to pass wealth to your children.”
Phasing out national sovereignty
In the summary of the High-Level Political Forum
of Sustainable Development that came up with the 17 goals to be implemented by
2030, it clearly states that member nations will be expected to make
"constitutional amendments and creation or adjustments of
institutions" to implement the goals.
Martin Sajdik, president
of the U.N. Economic and Social Council, states
in the summary that "Governments
must respond with policies that support individuals throughout their life
course and promote non-discrimination and inclusivity," with
"adequate attention" given to "marginalized and disadvantaged
groups, including children, youth, the old, women, indigenous peoples, persons
with disabilities and migrants."
The U.N. is calling for a massive propaganda
campaign at all levels to bring its "transformative global agenda"
into being. It even has a slogan: "Leave no one behind."
Sajdik in his summary describes how U.N. Agenda
2030's goals will be promoted, extending into social media, traditional media
and even embedded in every nation's pop culture through music and art:
"Communication should aim to make people
understand how they personally contribute to the global agenda and to feel
proud of this. It will be important to project that this is a universal agenda,
with a much greater level of ambition than one could have imagined a few years
ago. The motto to 'Leave no one behind' is also a powerful vehicle for
mobilizing people. It can be a two-way street, and be used to collect data on
what people want and to create feed-back loop.
"The agenda should be communicated through
social media, traditional media and traditional civil society mobilization
techniques as well as art, music and culture. Communication will have to happen
in all countries and at all levels, down to the local grass roots level where
implementation takes place. It needs to reach all groups and to be tailored to
various countries and groups. It is also good to identify and target
trend-setters in various communities."
While a small cadre of activists are poised to
expose the U.N. 2030 agenda as a war against national sovereignty and the
middle class, the vast majority of Americans are completely unaware of the
U.N.'s plan to reorder society and transform the global economic system.
There has been virtually no coverage of the 2030
Agenda in the establishment media to date, but Wood says to get ready for a
barrage of media indoctrination that appeals to emotional themes like world
poverty and income inequality.
"The people are so unaware of the magnitude
of this," Wood said. "Agenda 21 was introduced as a voluntary
program, very innocuous, where all their apologists said, 'We didn’t force it
on you, so what's the harm?'"
In reality, very little about Agenda 21 turned
out to be voluntary. Expect the same with the 2030 Agenda. "It's been
implemented from the top down. And, very cleverly, the spin they put on it is unbelievable,"
Wood said.
Instead of wiping out poverty, the elimination
of plentiful coal and forced greening of the economy will drive more people
into poverty, Wood believes, as utility rates soar and private property becomes
the sole domain of the super wealthy. Anyone who protests will be branded as a
"conspiracy theorist," or worse.
This is a process that has been mastered by the
left since the 1970s and 1980s, when the elites started using Hollywood to sell
their agenda.
"It reminds me of the skit they did in 1981
on the 'Barney Miller' show on the Trilateral Commission," Wood said.
"It was hilarious, but it was complete misinformation, branding anyone who
would talk about it as an idiot. Where did that little hit piece come from and
work its way into a 'Barney Miller' segment? "The message came out: You
bring this up, and you deserve to be in jail."
Wood was at the time trying to market his 1979
book, "Trilaterals Over Washington," co-authored with Dr. Antony
Sutton of the Hoover Institute at Stanford University. The book was boycotted
and never saw the light of day on the shelves of major bookstores.
So he expects similar attacks on anyone who
exposes the truth about U.N. Agenda 2030. "They put out the spin, and
that's what people remember," he said. "They clearly have got the
upper hand at this point, and I think awareness is the key. We have to hammer
it and call it for what it is, and maybe we can change the spin. If they win,
they will shut us up."
U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon appointed 27
"eminent persons" to the so-called "High-level Political
Forum," which came up with the 17 goals and 169 targets. Only one American
was appointed: former Clinton chief of staff and Trilateralist John Podesta,
who also served as Obama's top climate-change adviser and now is managing
Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
The 29-page document will be up for a vote of
the General Assembly at the Sept. 25-27 summit. "There will be lots of
smokescreens to keep people's attention away from this," Wood said.
"What they intend to do, I believe, is to
have a presentation of the document; they will have a lot of people say a lot
of good things about it, but it will not be open for discussion. You will not
be able to add to it or change it, but they will have speakers like the pope
say this is great and needs to be approved," Wood said. "The idea is
to get every nation on the planet to sign on to the outcome and say they will
commit to do these things."
Congress forced to go along?
And, just like it did so effectively with Agenda
21, the U.N. will again stress that there is no legally binding mechanism for
Agenda 2030. That means it's not a treaty, but it is a "politically
binding" document.
"Agenda 21 wasn't legally binding, either;
it was politically binding. The difference is subtle. Political leaders like
Obama will use a politically binding document to browbeat Congress and tell
them if you do not follow this you will devastate our reputation on the world
stage. Congress will say, 'We didn't sign any legally binding agreement on
this,' but the president will say, 'It doesn't matter. I signed it, and you
will carry it out.' It's like what he's doing with the Iran deal right
now."
The Republican leadership will likely side with
Obama, marginalizing those members in the House and Senate who object.
"If Congress doesn’t go along with Obama on
this, you know what he's going to do? He's going to go straight to the EPA and
tell them to tighten the screws, and we'll just meet these goals and targets
ourselves, through regulations. We'll complete the kill-off of the coal
industry. We'll refuse tax-exempt status for anyone who tries to resist us.
"Obama will tell them, 'Look, I made a
politically binding agreement on this. You can't back out, and regardless of
what you decide, I'm going to carry it out.' And Congress is left neutered.
Impotent. Like they have been on everything else he has done."
Wood expects Republicans such as Jeb Bush, Chris
Christie, Marco Rubio and many of others running for president, would, if
elected, follow through with implementing the 2030 Agenda.
"At this point, there will be zero chance
except that you literally disband these agencies, like the EPA, because you
can't get rid of these technocrats. They have incredible power," Wood
said. "This is the problem people don’t understand. Who is really wielding
the power today? Most Americans believe it's Congress. But they don't. Even a
new president coming in cannot go in and selectively remove these career
bureaucrats. They are civil servants; some were hired by Reagan."
The only candidate who promised to close entire
agencies such as the EPA and Department of Education was Ron Paul. "He was
the only one who promised that. It would have been almost like civil war in
every direction if he had been elected," Wood said. "It would be
tough. It would not just be a stroke of the pen. It would be very hard, but it
could be done. Awareness is the big thing here. And if the people don't finally
figure out what a big scam this is, we're in trouble."
Source:http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/mega-agenda-21-resurrected-with-popes-help/
Comments
It looks like we have a “bad Pope”. We’ve had them before. We need to “respectfully disagree” with
everything we can muster.
Ending world hunger is the failed
responsibility of the governments of all 3rd world and bankrupt countries. This scam seeks to drain developed countries
of their freedom and wealth and make every country a 3rd world
country. The only thing that works to end world hunger is free markets.
We need to quit the UN because of the damage
they have caused with the global warming scam.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
1 comment:
Well, even my Irish ancestors have been disagreeing with the Pope about many things for a long time. (And what'd it get them? Landed and prosperous in Virginia *before* the potato famine.)
Post a Comment