Sunday, September 6, 2015

UN’s New $100 billion Scam

UNFCC has set up a Green Climate Fund 'Pay up' by Sikeli Qounadovu, 9/4/15,
Kiribati President Anote Tong engages in discussions with UN Special Convoy for climate change Mary Robinson (left) and Dr Mahendra Kumar, PIDF Climate Change Advisor at the 3rd PIDF Leaders Summit in Suva. Picture: JOVESA NAISUA
THE Pacific Islands Development Forum (PIDF) will call on the world's biggest emitters of greenhouse gases to compensate all Pacific Islands that are affected by climate change.
At the PIDF meeting yesterday, the forum agreed that compensation will be a key component in the Suva Declaration which will be adopted today at the conclusion of the meeting.
PIDF Interim Secretary-General Amena Yauvoli said "those who are responsible for emitting the most greenhouse gases should pay" as their actions contradicted what they had agreed upon in the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCC).
"Our contribution of greenhouse gases emissions is less than one per cent and while we are contributing less, we are facing the full brunt of climate change. So we agreed to compensation in terms of migration and compensation in terms of loss and damage as a result of climate change."
When asked how compensation will be paid out Mr Yauvoli said, "we need to define the methodology and the criteria that need to be followed."
Given the need to address the seriousness of climate change, the UNFCC has set up a Green Climate Fund worth $US100billion ($F217b).
"Its purpose is to fund those nations affected by climate change, the question now is how we can access those funds," said Mr Yauvoli.
Meanwhile, in opening yesterday's meeting Mary Robinson, the United Nations Secretary-General's Special Envoy on Climate Change, said there had been discussion with relation to compensation
"The French Government is stewarding an informal process where ministers from across the world seek to find ways to resolve key issues that are emerging from the negotiations. As part of this process, there is an informal ministerial meeting next Sunday and Monday in Paris to look specifically at climate finance, means of implementation, adaptation and loss-and-damage which are all of vital importance to people in the Pacific and other SIDS."
http://www.fijitimes.com/story.aspx?id=320367&utm_source=CFACT+Updates&utm_campaign=029195b712-Pay_up_9_4_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_a28eaedb56-029195b712-270308565
 
What is President Obama willing to give away to obtain a UN climate agreement in Paris?
He and Secretary Kerry are doing all they can to create a foreign policy legacy during the months they have left.  They are desperate for “success,” even if that success spells disaster.
Many think the Iran nuclear agreement shows this administration will surrender any American interest in order to get a deal.
If so, the draft UN climate agreement is another one riddled with bad policy.
CFACT has reported many times that among the worst aspects of the proposed climate agreement is the concept of “loss and damage.”
Developing nations are demanding the U.S. and other prosperous nations shoulder the liability for any natural disasters that happen to strike their countries as a condition to their signing the UN agreement.
They are turning a blind eye to the fact the Earth has not warmed this century, and that the slight warming experienced during the 20th century was too small to meaningfully impact today’s natural weather events.
China and India are increasing their CO2 emissions as fast as their economies will allow, but they would get a pass.
Remarkably, the BBC reports Obama and Kerry may be getting ready to abandon the long-standing American negotiating position opposed to this expensive wealth redistribution scheme, and are preparing to cave.
Unless the public wakes up to what’s going on behind closed doors at the UN and speaks out, America could get stuck with a bill from the UN every time a hurricane, flood or drought strikes a poor nation.
When disaster strikes, we should lend a helping hand, and help other nations help themselves.
The fault, however, should not be seen as ours … and neither should the bill.
http://www.cfact.org/2015/09/04/who-pays-when-weather-strikes/
 

No comments: