Poorer nations suffering from extreme
weather disasters, so much so that their citizens are seeking refugee in safer
terrains outside their borders, want rich nations like the United States to pay
for reparations and to relocate populations.
Preparatory talks ahead of the United
Nations Conference on Climate Change to be held in Paris in December has
representatives from developing nations asking for more than an already agreed
upon $100
billion per year for climate change mitigation measures. They want
additional compensation for weather-related disasters as well as a
"displacement coordination facility" for refugees. And they want all
this to be legally binding as part of the larger anticipated Paris accord.
The U.S. and wealthier nations in the
European Union are balking. The rationale for the additional funds and refugee
facility is based on donor country failures to follow through cohesively on aid
pledges following weather-related disasters. For example, last March, Cyclone
Pam devastated islands in the South Pacific but attention quickly turned to the
massive earthquake in Nepal soon thereafter. That left small nations such as
Vanuatu, which was devastated, to manage its own cleanup without much in the
way of international assistance.
Poorer nations blame extreme
weather-related disasters on climate change stemming from emission-polluting
countries that have more developed and wealthier economies.
The U.N. Paris conference aims to
reach an international, legally binding agreement on climate change that would
reduce greenhouse gas emissions and thwart global temperature rise. A separate
agreement is being eyed to address losses and damages from extreme weather
events, thought to be a result of climate change.
As it stands, the Warsaw
Mechanism, adopted in 2013 at the U.N. climate conference in
Poland, established a structure to address losses and damages associated with
climate change impacts. However that mechanism is due to expire this year when
a new climate agreement is reached. Poorer nations who say they are on the
front lines of climate change and suffer the worst of its extreme weather
ramifications aren't pleased by the expiration. They want loss and damage
provisions to be extended and expanded upon.
Reports indicate a compromise will be
sought whereby the Warsaw Mechanism is extended, yet carved out from any
legally binding agreement.
Meanwhile, environmental groups are
lobbying to make reparations even more punitive and require polluting companies
in the private sector to step up and also pay for extreme weather-related
damages.
Property and casualty losses have been
a point of contention for years in climate-change discussions. How to handle
refugee claims is a relatively new issue that comes at a time when Europe is
facing a separate refugee crisis of its own, with hordes of people
seeking asylum from war-torn countries in the Middle East and North Africa.
Nine civil wars are raging in countries from Pakistan to Nigeria.
Adding climate refugees to those
numbers may be too much for government representatives to take on at the
moment. Without question, however, a refugee facility needs to be discussed if
not negotiated, as do further compensation measures for poor countries.
The $100 billion-a-year-commitment by
2020 seems like a lot of money, but increasingly it isn't looking like enough
funding. With extreme weather events on the rise, so too will be the costs of
cleanup and the tolls on people's lives.
Thomas M.
Kostigen is the founder of TheClimateSurvivalist.com and a New York Times bestselling
author and journalist. He is the National Geographic author of "Extreme Weather Survival Guide: Understand, Prepare, Survive, Recover" and the NG Kids book, "Extreme Weather: Surviving
Tornadoes, Tsunamis, Hailstorms, Thundersnow, Hurricanes and More!" Follow
him @weathersurvival, or email kostigen@theclimatesurvivalist.com.
Comments
We need
to quit the UN before they add more debt to our government credit card. Our free-spending federal government
“negotiators” have already proven their incompetence. We need to end the foreign aid we already
squander. Reparations is the new name
for “carbon tax”. Aren’t
property owners responsible for cleaning up their own property ?
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
1 comment:
Umm...I read that China is the biggest coal-burning, toxic-waste-generating nation these days? China looks closer to Vanuatu than the U.S. is, on my map. Why aren't they asking China to pay reparations?
Post a Comment