| MH-17 …Searching for the Truth by Craig Andresen on July 29, 2014 at 5:26 am Article Co-Written by Diane Sori |
On July 17th another Malaysian
plane…MH-17… went down but this time it was different. Different than MH-370 in
that this one did indeed crash. However, crashing is NOT what makes this
different…being shot down out of the sky does.
While early reports have everyone
blaming Vladimir Putin or Russia for this take down there are a few things that
just do NOT add up.
First, Putin was the one who told
Obama that a plane was down and that in and of itself seems an odd thing for someone
supposedly involved to have done. What’s even odder is that Obama was fast to
accuse Putin of downing the plane before the debris of the plane even had a
chance for its fires to die down.
The more we learn…in mere bits and
pieces…the more questions are raised. Questions like…was this an actual
surface-to-air take down or was this done by an air-to air-missile?
The actual flight path as compared
to what should have been the flight path was changed. According to Malaysian
air officials, the common route for these planes traveling to Asia would have
been about 200 miles south of the flight path this plane was on. Malaysian Air
is saying that air traffic control out of Kiev moved MH-17 to a flight path 200
miles north of the one normally used which sent MH-17 directly over the war
zone, an alteration probably done while the plane was still in Polish airspace.
Why did they move this plane 200
miles north over the exact area where other military planes had recently been
shot down? Part of the problem is that the Kiev government has reportedly
seized those records from air traffic control so we might NEVER know.
Another part of the problem is that
air traffic control knew damn well this was a civilian airliner and NOT a
military plane yet they diverted it over rebel held territory, which raises the
question of why would Ukrainian officials send a civilian plane over enemy
territory?
One possibility is that this was a
deliberate set-up done specifically to create collateral damage which would
then be used to defame Putin. And worse yet, could Obama have been part of NOT
the take down itself but in setting the blame game stage, especially since he
has been ‘neutered’ so to speak on the international stage by Putin. Remember,
Obama rushed to judgment, blaming Putin based on supposed ‘classified intel’
before any official investigation had begun. And then there was something he
said, something that even at the time seemed to be a preemptive strike should
the truth start to leak out.
“Our immediate focus will be on recovering
those who were lost, investigating exactly what happened and putting forward
the facts. And I want to point out
there will likely be misinformation as well. I think it’s very important
for folks to sift through what is factually based and what is simply
speculation,” Obama said.
Recovering those lost was Obama’s
primary goal NOT getting to the truth…more like silencing the truth if you ask
us.
Now more questions…if this was a Buk
missile it would have been an SA-11, and according to Jane’s Digest…the
military weapons digest…to track, lock on, and fire you need a minimum of 5-1/2
minutes. Then you need a visual on the target, and while the SA-11 is guided by
radar, you still have to have a visual on the target. MH-17 was a Boeing 777,
which we know was at cruising altitude of 33,000 feet and flying at a speed of
about 580 ground miles per hour. Because of the flight path and where it was
shot down, the plane would only have been over the target area for about a
minute and ten seconds, so…if this was a surface-to-air missile how did they
manage to track it for the required minimum time or get a visual on it,
especially on what was obviously a cloudy, overcast day as can be clearly seen
in the videos of the explosion?
That’s what’s making us think that
there’s a better likelihood that this was an air-to-air missile and NOT a
ground-to-air missile.
But what of the SAM…the SA-11 that
was reportedly fired? We know for a fact that Ukraine has had several military
aircraft, both fighters and cargo aircraft, shot down in that very area so
somebody is most definitely firing missiles but…what if this was an attempt to
shoot down yet another ‘military aircraft’ and MH-17 was a case of
mistaken identity? Could the separatists have mistaken a Ukrainian fighter jet
tailing a civilian aircraft for a Ukrainian fighter escorting a Ukrainian cargo
jet…that is indeed a likely possibility and a heat seeking SA-11 would have
targeted the greatest heat source…the exploding MH-17.
Seen so briefly on the overcast day,
separatists could very well have taken a shot as the fighter jet fired at
MH-17, and as the SA-11 surface-to-air missiles are heat seekers, the SAM would
naturally be drawn to the exploding jet leaving the initial impression with the
separatists that they had successfully hit their target.
But even with this possibility, we
keep coming back to this very important fact…Ukraine has the SU-25, a fighter
jet that carries air-to-air missiles. And this fighter jet can gain an altitude
of 6.2 plus miles and is equipped with air-to-air R-60 missiles that can hit a
target at a distance up to 7.4 plus miles.
The R-60 air-to-air missile, while
updated now, is still available in its original form and as the older version
would be less expensive for a struggling nation to purchase. We believe those
to be the missiles that are being used by Ukraine. The R-60 is equipped with a
fragmentation warhead and a proximity fuse NOT at all unlike the warhead and
fuse system used in the SA-11 and either would account for the reported
shrapnel damage to MH-17.
And this SU-25 jet is what the
Russian military said they detected gaining altitude towards MH-17 on the day
of the take down. Here we have a Ukranian fighter jet… according to the
Russians a mere 2 to 3 miles away from MH-17…and its presence of the Ukrainian
can be confirmed by video shots made by the Rostov monitoring center. Also,
according to the Russian Defense Ministry, at the moment of the MH-17
crash an American ‘spy’ satellite was parked in a geosynchronous orbit
that specific area of eastern Ukraine, and we… the U.S. government…was asked to
publish the space photos and data captured to help show the truth about who
shot down the plane, but to date these photos have NOT been published. Gee…we
wonder why…sarcastically said of course.
However, either
scenario…surface-to-air or air-to-air…could have resulted in the destruction of
MH-17 at 33,000 feet and left telltale signs of shrapnel penetration of the
aircraft.
But why would a Ukrainian fighter
jet do this…why would Ukraine do this? Simply because Ukraine is losing against
Russian forces…and losing big…and desperation could well be setting in is why.
What better way to turn the world’s public opinion their way than to place the
blame for civilian deaths in such a horrific fashion on Russia…on Putin.
Collateral damage is one thing but
intentionally caused collateral damage is something else entirely. But could
Ukraine have known ahead of time from the passenger flight manifest that MH-17
was mostly full of Europeans, as this too could help rouse Europe against
Russia, at least for the purpose of sanctions.
Now that we’ve presented two
possibilities let’s look at one quite different from the others but still
something that must be considered in this day and age of Muslim terrorists …. could
MH-17 been brought down by an internal explosion that just happened to occur at
the same time the rebels were firing their rockets…could this be Lockerbie
revisited?
Remember, at this time we’ve been
told a missile was fired but NO one to date has yet seen the ‘classified
intel’. Could a bomb have been in the cargo hold and been on a timer or
detonated by someone on board…just something to think about. And while with
Lockerbie terrorists did immediately take credit for the downing, with MH-17 NO
terrorists have yet piped in, but could…and we only say could…the terrorists
actually be the Ukrainians themselves…again solely to discredit Putin and the
Russians.
And remember, NO terrorist group…NO
islamic terrorist group…has yet taken credit for MH-370 which is still missing.
Now think of this very scary thought…isn’t it more effective NOT to take credit
for a plane’s downing and keep people on edge as it is to run and scream ‘we
did it.’ The unknown is always more frightening than the known and this would serve
terrorists… jihadis…well…as in keep them guessing… keep them scared.
But at this point NO matter who took
down MH-17 one thing remains…Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s rush to place the blame on
Vladimir Putin and Russia. Like we’ve said previously, Putin has totally
emasculated Obama in the eyes of the world. Now Obama is seen NOT as leading
from behind but seen as NOT leading at all. The ‘Russian Bear’ is now in a
position of strength for while he currently controls the flow of oil into
Europe, with both Ukraine and Crimea brought back into the ‘motherland’ he
would acquire his much wanted and needed warm water port on the Black Sea. This
NOT only would get Putin even more control over the flow of oil into Europe,
but would aid him NOT in his rebuilding of the old Soviet Union but in his
rebuilding of the Russian Empire. This in turn would knock the U.S. down to the
world’s number two superpower with Russia becoming number one.
But when all is said and done the
take down of MH-17 could very well be as we are being told (but we doubt it)…as
in the separatists shot a surface-to-air missile and brought this plane down.
We are just offering some alternative scenarios to think about, because when
Obama rushes to judgment, and when the media blindly falls in lockstep with
him, our antennas need to be at full alert. Remember, the last time Obama
rushed to judgment was over a YouTube video and we all know how that turned out
now don’t we.
Source:http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2014/07/29/mh-17-searching-for-the-truth/#comment-546835
No comments:
Post a Comment