Trump's
Vince Foster attack backed by new evidence, How
could a suicide victim be found with TWO bullet wounds? By Jerome Corsi,
5/24/16
NEW YORK – As Donald Trump revives the two-decade old Vince
Foster case, the charge that the cause of death of the top aide and close
friend of the Clintons may not have been suicide has once again been dismissed
as the stuff of “right-wing conspiracy theory.”
But less than three months ago, WND
reported a resignation letter surfaced from
the lead investigator in independent counsel Robert Fiske’s investigation of
the Foster case, Miguel Rodriguez, outlining evidence of his charge that the
case was fixed.
Thirteen years ago, WND reported Rodriguez, an assistant U.S. attorney, made an audio
recording in which he charged the suicide ruling was predetermined, the crime
scene was altered and major newspaper editors killed stories by reporters
pursuing the truth.
“This whole notion of [Fiske and Starr] doing an honest
investigation is laughable,” Rodriguez says in the tape.
In his resignation letter, Rodriquez refers to photographs
showing a wound on Foster’s neck that was not mentioned in Starr’s official
government report.
The obvious questions: How could a suicide victim be found
with two wounds, a .38-caliber gunshot into the mouth that exited through his
head and another wound on the right side of his neck that one of the paramedics
described as a small-caliber bullet hole? And why would the government
investigators go to great lengths to cover it up?
National Archives discovery
In 2009, two documents created by Rodriguez were discovered
in the National Archives by researchers Hugh Turley and Patrick Knowlton.
But Knowlton was not just any amateur researcher. He was a
grand jury witness who happened to be in Fort Marcy Park the day Foster died
and noticed discrepancies that were never addressed by Starr’s report.
Allan Favish, a Los Angeles attorney who took a Freedom of
Information Act case all the way to the Supreme Court seeking access to
photographs of Foster’s body as it lay in the park, said he started looking
into the case shortly after Foster’s death in 1993.
It was Favish who brought the National Archives discoveries
by Turley and Knowlton to the attention of WND.
“It all started in the mid-1990s, not too long after
Foster’s death, and I saw on the Internet, which was very unsophisticated at
the time, some people posting things about the death,” Favish told WND. “Hugh
Turley was involved very early on along with Knowlton.”
Rodriguez’s resignation letter to Starr, dated Jan. 17,
1995, says he was quitting because evidence was being overlooked in a rush to
judgment in favor of suicide and closing the grand-jury investigation.
Related
stories (story
continues below):
Trump
labels Vince Foster death ‘very fishy’ Why
was Hillary trying to reach Vince Foster on day he died? ‘Where
was Ted Cruz’s dad when Vince Foster was shot?’
In the audio recording, Rodriguez said the accepted verdict,
that Foster killed himself at Ft. Marcy Park near Washington, was predetermined
by a “higher authority” at the start of the investigation. Rodriguez noted he
did extensive interviews with major newspapers, including the New York Times,
that were never published.
“All I know is that things did not happen the way Fiske says
that they happened, and the reports don’t support what Fiske said,” Rodriguez
stated. “There is nothing consistent with [Foster] committing that kind of
violent act at all.”
Rodriguez, who was hired by Starr in 1994 to lead his grand
jury investigation, is now an assistant U.S. attorney in Sacramento,
California.
He was no conservative, wrote London Telegraph reporter
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in his book, “The Secret Life of Bill Clinton.”
“He had no ideological investment in the matter,”
Evans-Pritchard wrote. “Indeed, when he arrived from California with his
ponytail, his earring, and his leather jackets, there were comments among the
hard-liners that Kenneth Starr had gone too far in his efforts to recruit
Democrats, liberals, and ethnic minorities to his team.”
The recording was made public by Knowlton and his attorney
John Clarke. Clarke told WND he could not divulge how Knowlton acquired the
tapes but noted that by publishing the recording, he was putting his career on
the line.
“If I were to put out ginned up tapes of an assistant U.S.
attorney, they would revoke my license immediately,” he said. “It’s probably a
criminal offense.”
http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/trumps-vince-foster-attack-backed-by-new-evidence/
No comments:
Post a Comment