Politics
is blood sport. Most people only truly understand this as practitioners of
State politics, but the best arena from which to discern this octagon are parliaments. Two come to mind for
their ruthlessness: Israel & England.
Because
parliaments are subjected to extreme partisan rancor, they remain unstable, their
capacity to thwart national collapse rests on maintaining a homogenized social
base. Yet even with this, it remains possible that Fascism emerges when
an intractable social crisis emerges. This is occurring throughout
Eastern European political economies, especially those that experienced solidarity and Communism. The tragedy that
is Catholic political regimes is perennial, until you arrive on American
shores. Having our Constitutional Republic born from within the mores of
mercantile Christian Monarchies helped shape the contours of our Republicanism.
England
has never had numerated documentation of its identity. If anything,
England remains dangerously susceptible to Islamism, as its national identity
remains unenumerated, national consciousness would be enveloped by competing
philosophies.
Theresa
May’s opening gambit is to secure her premiership; she also seeks to
permanently kill off Labor. This is ambition on scale not seen in
decades. All of this occurs as backdrop to the ever widening Islamic
insurgency that is Londonstan.
By
pulling off a yes vote as Prime Minister, she’s actually fortifying England’s
position to openly thwart Islamism. Why
did May openly seek an election after initially saying she wouldn’t. The answer
is discerned in the electoral composition of Parliament immediately after the referendum
confirming Brexit.
Because
the referendum itself had no
legitimacy under England’s system of parliamentary supremacy, May needs a
stronger hand when facing the European Union. Tory members of the ‘remain’ side
still held stronger political cards against her. For her to move
judiciously, she’ll need to redraw the ideological and political tenor or her
own bench to compete both domestically and internationally.
Secondly,
England’s own House of Lords possesses previously un-asserted veto power.
May possessed a divided Conservative party. To win, she’ll need to
vanquish members of her own party while goring Labor. She just “may” pull this
off.
The
institutional confusion isn’t difficult to discern, too many members of her own
party disliked Brexit while previous Tory leadership embodied passivity to the
emerging challenges gathering abroad and at home. As such, professional
politicians preferred the security of a backward looking mien. May is
different, and she needs to be if England is to survive.
Here’s
what May seeks to have: a brutally beaten opposition and a dramatically
weakened House of Lords, for if she writes Brexit into a Tory governing
manifesto, she’ll have produced invincible constitutional limits on what the
House of Lords can obstruct. Leadership par-excellence.
In the
House of Commons, the Conservative Party has 330 seats and the Labor Party has
230 seats and the Scottish National Party has 54 seats. The other 21 seats are held by members of 7
other minor parties.
In the
House of Lords, the Conservative Party has 253 members, the Labor Party has 201
members, the Crossbench has 175 members and the Liberal Democrats has 102
members. The other 10 Parties have a total of 69 members.
Comments
The
Parties are split, but May could pull her followers from the Conservative and
Labor Parties. May’s real constituents are the UK voters who voted to exit the
EU.
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment