The Islamic supremacist approach is
stealthier here in the States than it is in Europe, where we see no-go zones,
mass car burnings, etc., because Europe currently has a much bigger Muslim
population than the U.S. does. More on Muslim immigration here.
That kind of aggression is in our
future, for nothing is being done to prevent its coming here. The few of us who
dare to speak against Sharia and jihad are blacklisted from the mainstream
media’s major newspaper and broadcast outlets. Trimmers (those who soften the
message about Islam or speak of “Islamism,” an artificial word making a
distinction without a difference) and Islamic apologists are dusted off and
trotted out to make some inane comment whenever the mainstream media cannot
avoid covering a jihad news story (such as the Boston Marathon jihad bombing).
But the effective true voices against Islamization, such as myself, Robert
Spencer, Wafa Sultan, and Ibn Warraq are rarely seen these days.
It’s never been as bad as it is now,
and we have never been proven so right as we were in 2013. In the U.S.,
in a survey released at the end of 2012, almost half of the Muslims
in America said that they thought parodies of Muhammad should be subject to
criminal prosecution. One in eight thought that insulting Islam should be a
death penalty offense. Forty percent said that they shouldn’t have to obey U.S.
laws, but should be subject only to Islamic law.
These findings should have come as
no surprise; they weren’t much different from those of a May 2013 survey
of Muslims worldwide. The survey showed that the harshest Sharia
punishments enjoy broad support among Muslims the world over: “72% of
Indonesian Muslims, 84% of Pakistani Muslims, 82% of Bengladeshi Muslims, 74%
of Egyptian Muslims, and 71% of Nigerian Muslims supported making Sharia the
official state law of their respective societies.” 85% of Muslims in Pakistan,
81% in Afghanistan, and 70% in Egypt supported the most brutal aspects of
Sharia, such as amputating the hands of thieves. 86% of Muslims in Pakistan,
84% in Afghanistan, and 80% in Egypt supported stoning for adultery. 75% in
Pakistan, 79% in Afghanistan, and 88% in Egypt favored executing those who
leave Islam. “91% of Iraqi Muslims and 99% of Afghan Muslims supported making
Sharia the official state law of their respective societies.”
And in America, wherever Islamic law
and American law conflict, it is increasingly American law that gives way.
Islam is even taught in public schools, according to a report at The
Blaze:
An elementary school teacher in
Chesapeake, Va. has been charged with simple assault after a parent claimed her
daughter’s hand was cut open as a result of the teacher yanking her arm
aggressively while trying to teach students an “Islamic hand sign.”
In November 2012, a Muslim mother
went on trial for beating her teenage daughter after the girl refused an
arranged marriage and was seen at school talking to a boy who was not her
planned husband. Her devout Muslim father stabbed his daughter in the neck,
leaving a wound an inch and a half long, and admitted that he tried to kill
her. This couple was freed: the mother got two years of probation.
This was Arizona. Not
Yemen, not Iran, but Phoenix. This is the Sharia in America, for honor violence
is not merely sanctioned in Islam, it is encouraged. And honor murder of the
offspring is sanctioned under Islam: according to Reliance of the
Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, “not subject to
retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing
their offspring, or offspring’s offspring” (o1.1-2).
The following month, a leader of the
Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which has now been declared a terrorist
organization by the Egyptian government, spoke at a mosque in Brooklyn.
The NYPD enforced the Sharia there as well, arresting a man who came to protest
against Brotherhood atrocities in Egypt. One must not criticize Islam or its
self-appointed representatives – even in Brooklyn.
In another Sharia ruling that same
month, a federal judge ruled against a Tulsa police captain who had
exercised his First Amendment rights and refused to force some of his
subordinates to attend a dawah (Islamic proselytizing) event at a Tulsa mosque.
If these police officers had been required to go to a church, they’d have won
their case.
In Minnesota in November 2013,
the YMCA and the St. Paul Police Department organized a Muslim swim, restricted
to Muslim women only, with taxpayer dollars. The police department is providing
transportation for the Muslimas to segregated Sharia swim at the YMCA. There
are thousands of Islamic centers across the country — Sharia swim belongs
there, not in our public pools. If it is so crucial that these Muslims live
under Sharia, why move here? Why not live in a Sharia state?
Instead, Sharia is coming here. In
June 2013, it was revealed that the San Francisco Airport used public
money to construct a foot-washing station for Muslims. Harvard University in
January 2013 posted a Qur’anic verse at the entrance of its faculty
of law,describing the verse as one of the greatest expressions for justice
in history, heedless of the fact that Sharia law is the antithesis of America
law. The Constitution is the great shining moment of Western civilization,
based on individual rights, the premise of which is the opposite of Islamic
law.
In Minnesota, a Catholic university,
the University of St. Thomas, in January 2013installed mini-mosques and
Islamic foot baths for Muslims. Where are the cathedrals and pews in the
madrassas? There is no reciprocity in Islam. Non-Muslims cannot pray in
mosques. Non-Muslims are only permitted into mosques for dawah (proselytizing).
Islamic outreach goes only one way: to Islam. But this is a Catholic university
turning itself over to the very ideology that inspires the mass slaughter of
Christians across the world. It is astonishing and horrifying in the same
breath.
Public schools in Florida are
teaching that Muhammad is “God’s messenger.” In Indiana, a Muslim
family went from classroom to classroom in a public school, handing out
material proselytizing for Islam. Texas public school students were made
to wear burqas. In January 2013 in Maryland, Muslim high school students
demanded prayer accommodations in a public school.
In August 2013, a Tennessee
elementary school banned pork to avoid offending Muslims.Children are
drawing the five pillars of Islam in Tennessee public schools. The
Nashville, Tennessee public school system is teaching dangerous
lies in an Islamic lesson plan written by Islamic dissemblers and rife
with grammatical errors and poor English. Where are the children’s drawings of
Christ on the cross? Where are the teachings of the Rashi? Where is the
Chumash?
This isn’t public education. This
is dawah. And it is happening all over, but patriots are fighting
back: in September 2013, an Ohio mom got an Islamic proselytizing
videoremoved from her child’s seventh-grade history class. In November
2013, hundreds of parents protested against pro-Islam indoctrination
contained in a public school textbook.
In New York, the NYPD is enforcing
Sharia as well: police have orders not to ticket cars that are illegally parked
outside of mosques. The NYPD lets Muslims break laws ordinary citizens would
ordinarily face extensive punitive damages for, simply because they are
Muslims. If someone is double parked because he is going to church, he would
get a ticket right away.
Other Muslims in Brooklyn flex
their muscles by holding prayers out on the street, making it impossible for
anyone to pass.
Meanwhile, the media and law
enforcement turn a blind eye to abuse when Muslim are its perpetrators. In
October 2013, a student at a Muslim school in Ohio reported that “if they do
not learn their religious passages as they are instructed,” they are at time
“chained to a wall by their wrists and ankles and beaten with a long stick.”
The imams of Sacramento’s two largest mosques in June 2013
declared that Muhammad had forbidden music. The media yawned.
The media kept yawning when those
whom it had anointed as “moderates” were repeatedly exposed as “extremists.” In
December 2012, a Bangladesh tribunal accused the New York imam and
President of the “moderate” Islamic Circle of North America, Ashrafuzzaman Khan,
of war crimes and mass murder. Not until ten months later did ICNA
remove Khan’s name from its website — in the same way as Muslim groups and
Islamic supremacists in America scrub their narrative of the jihadic doctrine
and the brutal and bloody Sharia (although at that time Khan was still
listed on the contact page for the North American Imams Federation
Northeast regional office).
I’d like to know what took so long.
Why did they stand behind this vicious, bloodthirsty savage all this time?
Because he is a devout Muslim adhering to Islamic texts and teachings?
The most prominent “moderate”
organization, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), despite its
Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood ties and the convictions of several of its
officials on jihad terror charges, continued to enjoy mainstream acceptance in
2013. Melvin Bledsoe, the father of Muslim jihad terrorist Abdulhakim Mujahid
Muhammad, actually pleaded with a Florida school board to stop CAIR
from giving presentations in public schools.
But mostly CAIR advanced unopposed.
No one was particularly concerned when it came to light that a CAIR-tied
American imam, Khalid Yasin, inspired the devout Muslim who beheaded
a British soldier on a public street in London, or when former CAIR-New York
official Cyrus McGoldrick justified the beheading, claiming that “British and
American soldiers commit worse atrocities against Muslims every day.” Nor did
anyone seem to mind when CAIR told the family of a dead jihadist not
to talk to the FBI.
In February 2013, the Maryland
chapter of CAIR announced that its operatives had testified at a
hearing of the Maryland General Assembly’s Health & Government Operations
Committee in support a law that “would prohibit any state agency or employee
from aiding in the detention of a person in accordance with what many say are
unconstitutional provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).”
How was it that a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group would be testifying on such a
matter? It would be like Nazis testifying at hearings during World War II on
the detention of Third Reich “detainees.”
And in August 2013, in another
incident indicative of undeserved CAIR’s mainstream status, a pro-jihad CAIR
official gave a presentation on “Understanding Sharia & Family Law Mediation” at
a legal conference on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). In the environment
in which all this is happening, it is no surprise that your First Amendment
rights are being obliterated. John Jamason, a patriot in Florida, posted a
message on Facebook on our national day of grief, September 11: “Never forget.
There is no such thing as radical Islam. All Islam is radical. There may be
Muslims who don’t practice their religion, much like others. The Quran is a
book that preaches hate.”
For that, Hamas-tied CAIR called for
his firing. Palm Beach County Administrator Bob Weisman said that Jamason would
have been fired had he not been a merit system employee. Yet Jamason’s message
was true. Twelve years after 9/11, Islamic blasphemy law was quickly becoming
the law of the land. Jamason, however, stood his ground and said to reporters:
“If I owe anybody an apology, it would be the county commissioners and county
administration just for the fact that you’re all on my porch. No, I don’t think
I owe anybody an apology, I didn’t say anything offensive.”
He didn’t do or say anything
offensive. But when it comes to Islam, there is nothing too small or
insignificant that cannot be deemed “offensive.” CAIR worked in numerous
other ways also to bring the Sharia to the U.S. In one notable instance,
it filed suit against DHL to impose Muslim prayer times on the
workplace in Kentucky. It is not required for a Muslim to pray at a certain
time if necessity makes it impossible to do so. Prayer is not absolutely required
a strict schedule, and Muslim prayers are commonly “made up” after work or
school. Suits like the one are merely devices in which to impose Islam on
non-believers.
The Obama Administration helped out
with that endeavor in 2013. For the first time, Muslim Brotherhood groups and
Islamic supremacists have an administration working with them to impose Sharia,
the authoritarian system of Islamic oppression, on the U.S. Obama’s Justice
Department announced, in an out-of-the-way corner of Tennessee, its intention
to criminalize free speech on social media posts that Muslims found offensive.
AFDI/SIOA called for a protest of this attempt to impose Islam’s blasphemy laws
on Americans – and in a town of 10,000 people, we had two thousand
patriots showed up.
In keeping with Obama’s vow
that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of
Islam,” the filmmaker of a video on Muhammad that the Administration
falsely blamed for the Benghazi jihad attack of September 11, 2012 was
imprisoned: Obama’s first political prisoner. In August 2013, he finally
got “supervised release” from jail.
In May 2013, the Sharia
administration strikes again. The EEOC sued Star Transport for rightfully
terminating two Muslims who refused to do their job and transport alcohol. If
these Muslim truck drivers didn’t want to deliver alcohol, then they shouldn’t
have taken a job in which part of their duties would be to deliver alcohol.
It’s that simple. The EEOC needs reminding that its name is the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission. “Equal” as in no special rights for any
particular class.
In a similar case in November
2013, a Muslim was awarded $66,000 in back pay after he was fired for refusing
to shave his beard in accordance with company rules. This ruling could put the
company, American Patriot, out of business. That’s the whole point: Muslim
Brotherhood groups demand that non-Muslims adhere to the Sharia, or they’ll
destroy them. And they use American law to impose Islamic law. Islamic
supremacists chip chip away at the establishment clause, and in doing so,
impose Islam on the secular marketplace.
Muslim lawsuits against Hertz,
Wal-Mart, Target, Disney, and a host of other American businesses for special
rights and special accommodation have been largely successful, creating special
rights for a special class of people — which is an accordance with Islam (in
which Muslims are superior to the kuffar). But it goes against every American
tenet of individual rights and separation of religion and state.
Muslim Brotherhood groups continued
their influence on the Obama Administration in 2013, while the mainstream media
heaped ridicule on Michele Bachmann and anyone else who dared to suggest that
this influence might exist. Yet for the first time in history, America is
supporting pro-Sharia, anti-freedom forces on a large scale – the same enemy
that struck us on September 11, 2001. This has resulted in the loss of Egypt
and Libya and perhaps eventually the whole of Africa to Islamic supremacist
regimes.
With all this happening, it is no surprise
that the culture has accepted the norming of Sharia restrictions. The Wall
Street Journal reported in July 2013 that Joyce Carol Oates set off a
firestorm on Twitter “with a pair of tweets about sexual violence in Egypt.”
One asked: “Where 99.3% of women report having been sexually harassed &
rape is epidemic–Egypt–natural to inquire: what’s the predominant religion?”
Even for a revered leftist icon like
Joyce Carol Oates, the resulting uproar was swift and predictable. Umair Haque
of the Harvard Business Review fumed: “Don’t miss
@JoyceCarolOates coming out publicly as a serious bigot. Check out her tweets
today, they’re awesomely gross!” Salon’s Prachi Gupta smeared Oates
as “Islamophobic.” Feminists and Islamic supremacists alike lined up to condemn
Oates as a racist-Islamophobic-anti-Muslim-bigot.
Welcome to my world, Joyce. Wait
until she broaches subjects such as honor killings, female genital mutilation,
forced marriage, child marriage, etc. Wait until she dares to subject that
Islam has something to do with those, too, as it obviously does. Something
tells me she enjoys the blacklist. The sharp, piercing shrieks against the
truth speak volumes and expose the left for the monsters they are.
In November 2013, Conan O’Brien
tweeted this innocuous joke about Marvel’s new Muslim superheroine:
“She has so many more special powers than her husband’s other wives.”
Didn’t Conan know that you cannot
joke about Islam and Sharia, or misogyny, gender apartheid, creed apartheid,
misogyny, or polygamy under the Sharia? It’s blasphemy. Off with his head.
Islamic supremacists and their leftist tools went after Conan immediately,
calling him a racist, and he apologized. First off, Islam is not a race.
Secondly, multiple wives are encouraged in Islam. 70% of American
Muslims say that polygamy should be legalized in the US, with over
100,000 Muslims engaging in polygamy here in America.
And also worth noting is the fact
that Muhammad’s favorite wife was six years old when he married her. This
Muslima superhero is 16 — practically an old lady. Conan didn’t joke about
that. And lastly, where is Marvel’s Christian superheroine, Jewish
superheroine, Hindu superheroine, et al?
In October 2013, my law firm,
the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC), on behalf of AFDI, struck a blow
against this Sharia self-enforcement. We filed a motion asking the
federal court in Seattle to order the King County transit authorities to run
our anti-terrorism advertisement featuring photos of 16 of the world’s Most
Wanted Terrorists. The link to the motion is here.
Yes, 12 years after 9/11, it has
come to this: We have to file suit to fight against jihad terrorism.
As Walid Shoebat put it, “posting the images of wanted terrorists is
now the business of hatemongers and those who defend said terrorists are
freedom’s champions.”
It all started last July, when the
FBI ran a terrorism awareness campaign featuring bus ads depicting
photos of 16 wanted terrorists, all of whom were Muslim. This was a publicity
campaign sponsored by the Joint Terrorism Task Force for the State Department’s
Rewards for Justice program, or RFJ. But then the leftists and Islamic
supremacists complained that the ads were “Islamophobic,” and they came down –
and unbelievably, Seattle is refusing to allow my group, the AFDI, to put them
back up.
The Islamic supremacist enemies of
free speech won a victory in Boston. My organization AFDI tried to place
pro-Israel ads in Boston, countering anti-Israel ads that ran there. Our ad
read, “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the
civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat jihad.”
The ad was rejected, and we sued. In
late December 2013, U.S. District Court Judge Gorton ruled against us in
our preliminary injunction against Boston’s Massachusetts Bay Transit
Authority (MBTA). No surprise here, during our hearing Judge Gorton said that
he did not have the authority to rule on matters out of his jurisdiction.
Still, Gorton dropped the ball on the question of “reasonableness.”
This is Boston, after all, site of
the most recent jihad bombing in America, so Gorton’s ruling is sad and
regrettable. We will, of course, appeal. But the willful ignorance of MBTA
authorities is no surprise: after all, the mainstream media tried to blame
the Boston Marathon bombing on Americans being unwelcoming to immigrants, while
the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI dropped the ball: although
Russia warned them several times about the jihadist activities of Tamerlan
Tsarnaev, they never placed him under surveillance. And in September 11, 2013,
a Boston school recited a Muslim prayer instead of the Pledge of
Allegiance.
And when we ran ads telling the
truth about jihad and Islamic anti-Semitism in San Francisco in March
2013, a host of city officials, including the District Attorney and several
city lawmakers, held a news conference to denounce our ads. The slaughter
of Christians in Nigeria, Egypt, Syria, et al — that didn’t warrant a
statement, let alone a press conference, but my ads did. Think about that.
Thousands dead, but it would be blasphemy to talk about that. Slaughter in the
cause of jihad is okay; my talking about it is the problem.
When we followed up by running ads
highlighting the persecution of gays in Muslim countries, the head of the San
Francisco Human Rights Commission, transgender Theresa Sparks, supported the
Sharia and denounced our ad campaign. Our campaign used actual anti-gay quotes
of Iran’s former President Ahmadinejad, global Muslim spiritual leader Yusuf
al-Qaradawi, and a popular radio host in the UK, Sister Ruby Ramadan. Sparks
went so far to say, “it’s actually easier to get insurance for sexual
transition procedures in Iran than in America.” Hmmm, is that why the President
of Iran insists there are no homosexuals in that country? It’s actually because
male homosexuals are only allowed to live in Iran as women.
Where was Theresa Sparks when a
Muslim gang was targeting gays in San Francisco in a series of attacks,
shooting them in the face with a BB gun and video-taping the attacks? A Muslim
gang targeted nearly a dozen victims one evening, recording the
shootings on avideo camera confiscated by police along with a
“rifle-style” BB gun. There was a concerted effort within the San
Francisco police department to bury this story, and it is only because one
officer leaked the report to the media that anything was ever reported.
The Muslims chose their
victims “because they appeared to be gay.” Where was
Sparks then?
Sparks and her colleagues said
nothing when Muslim cabbies have forced their customers to adhere to Sharia: in
June 2013 in Chicago, a Muslim cabbie threw a gay couple out of the cab on
the expressway, because they were kissing. In August 2013 in
Oregon, aMuslim cabbie dumped a lesbian couple on the
side of the road because they were gay. In Nebraska in November 2013,
a Muslim attacked his sister with a crowbar for being gay.
Yet in the media, Muslims are only
victims, and always victims. America is drowning in this relentless
Muslim-victimhood propaganda in the media and movies. In December 2013, it came
to light that HBO Films consulted with CAIR on a propaganda war film on
“Islamophobia.”
While Christians are being
persecuted and slaughtered across the Muslim world and the jihad against the
Jewish state of Israel continues unabated, we are subjected to this
preposterous lie of the “victimization” of the perps. (Goebbels did the same
thing. The Nazis, too, were the victims.)
Terror-tied groups like CAIR were
consulted on this propaganda film – the kind of war film that Hollywood
giants like Frank Capra and John Ford made during World War II forour side.
Sixty years later, Hollywood is making these movies for the enemy narrative.
It’s just a small piece of how the left lost the West.
When is HBO going to make a movie
about non-Muslims being persecuted and slaughtered under the Sharia in Muslim
countries?
When is HBO going to make a movie
about the Islamic supremacist war against secular governments in Africa and the
Middle East?
When is HBO going to make a movie
about Jews fleeing Europe as the Islamization of the continent makes it too
dangerous and violent for Jews?
Where is HBO going to make a movie
about how the people who spoke out against jihad and Sharia had their good
names and livelihoods destroyed by Islamic supremacists and their leftwing
libelists?
Now those are real horror movies.
This is the marketing of fiction as
reality in concert with daily admonishments from Muslim groups, beating us
about the head with “Islamophobia!” “Anti-Muslim backlash!” “Hate crime!”
“Racist-islamophobic-anti-Muslim-bigotry!”
The grim reality, as opposed to this
fiction, was that in addition to the advancing stealth jihad, the violent jihad
continued in the U.S. in 2013. In December 2013, a California Muslim
pleaded guilty to attempting to aid al Qaeda by providing weapons training to
jihad savages. A week before that, a federal grand jury returned an
indictment charging a Wichita Muslim with planning a bombing of Wichita’s
Mid-Continent Airport. That same day, the FBI added a Massachusetts Muslim
to its Most Wanted Terrorists List.
In November 2013 in San
Diego, three Muslims, including a popular imam, were sentenced to prison
for jihad terror activity. Another imam tried to play the victim card:
a Des Moines imam argued that sex charges against him violated his
religious freedom. AU.S.-based Muslim was charged in New York City with trying
to acquire 100 surface-to-air missiles for the Iranian government. Two Muslims
from Long Island were arrested in yet another jihad terror plot. In
October 2013, Muslim terror mastermind Abu Anas al-Libi reminded the
world of what motivates and inspires all this violence when he appeared in a
Manhattan courtroom clutching a copy of the Qur’an.
In September 2013, New
York-raised jihadist Sabirhan Hasanoff was sentenced to eighteen years in
prison. Another American Muslim, Alwar Pouryan, got 25 years for
conspiring to funnel missiles and rifles to the Taliban. And yet another U.S.
Muslim, Abdel Hameed Shehadeh, got thirteen years in another Islamic
terror training case.
A Virginia Muslim was charged
with the possession of explosives. A sword-wielding Muslim attacked
California deputies while screaming “Allahu akbar.” A Muslim in North
Dakota was charged with threatening a synagogue. In August 2013, San
Francisco went on high alert after an Islamic terror threat. In July 2013
in Denver, a self-proclaimed “Islamist jihadist” threatened that Mormons
and Catholics “would be destroyed” within the next two weeks. In late
April 2013, just days after the Boston Marathon jihad bombing, an online poster
calling himself “Prophet Muhammad” threatened a Catholic high school in
Virginia with a Boston-style jihad bombing.
A Florida teen, a convert to
Islam, was indicted for conspiring to aid jihad terrorists. Another
convert to Islam in Pennsylvania was charged with inciting violent jihad
online. In Washington, a convert to Islam who had stated his “willingness
to die for Islam” stabbed two people after discussion of religion. A Muslim in
New York was arrested formaking bomb threats against Kodak. A
Chicago Muslim who tried to blow up Wrigley Field got 23 years in
prison. In Minnesota, Muslim mobs randomly attacked joggers. In Idaho, a
Muslim was arrested for providing bomb-making knowledge to a jihad group, and
for possession of a grenade, aluminum powder, potassium nitrate, sulfur,
and a fuse. Seven Muslim chemical engineers were caught trespassing after
midnight at Boston’s largest water reservoir. In January 2013, a
Muslim from Chicago got thirty-five years for his role in the Mumbai
jihad massacre.
In May 2013, a Muslim in North
Carolina pled guilty to buying gun for “terrorist jihad,” to kill soldiers
at Fort Bragg. Another North Carolina Muslim got four life terms for a jihad
plot to behead witnesses whose testimony helped convict him for an earlier
jihad plot to slaughter U.S. servicemen and their families. In April 2013,
an Alabama Muslim pled guilty to plotting to wage jihad. On Easter
Sunday in Ashtabula, Ohio, a Muslim screaming “this is the will of Allah”
murdered his father at a church.
In Oregon, a Muslim was charged with
assisting a jihadist homicide bomber who killed 30 people. In
February 2013 in Las Vegas, a Muslim went on a sparsely reported shooting
spree. That same month, a Muslim in New Jersey beheaded and cut off the
hands of two Coptic Christians; another Muslim pled guilty in
New York City to plotting to blow up the Federal Reserve; and a jihadist in
California tried to blow up the Oakland Bank of America and blame it
on right-wingers.
In just one week, ending March 30,
2013, there was all this jihad activity in the U.S.:
- A former U.S. soldier was charged with conspiring to
use a destructive device while fighting with an al-Qaeda group in Syria
- A Muslim named Ahmed Warsame pleaded guilty to aiding
al-Shabaab and al-Qaeda
- Another Muslim, Abu Khalid Abdul-Latif, was sentenced
to prison for his role in a jihad plot to attack a Seattle military
processing center
- Yet another Muslim, Abdel Hameed Shehadeh, was found
guilty of making false statements in a jihad terror case
- Al-Shabaab member Mohamed Ibrahim Ahmed got nine years
in prison for jihad activities
- A federal grand jury began probing a double murder in
Pakistan that turned out to be an honor killing ordered by a Muslim cabbie
in New York City.
The outgoing FBI director, Robert
Mueller, warned Americans that jihadists here in America were today’s most
serious security concern. You might assume that the vast majority of Muslims in
America rejected all that, but recently a jihad-supporting imam raised
millions on a U.S. fundraising tour.
American jihadists were increasingly
brazen and open about their sentiments and activities. Memphis imam Yasir
Qadhi was filmed spewing vicious Jew-hatred, and saying that Jews and
Christians were “filthy,” and that the Muslims could take their lives and
property in jihad. A Muslim who pled guilty in August 2013 to jihad terror
charges said:“The goal of Islam is to take over the world, and the means of achieving
that goal was the sword of jihad.”
Just as brazen was convicted
Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror chief Sami Al-Arian, who in December 2013
resurfaced to support a new American Muslim Brotherhood campaign. In Dearborn,
Michigan, a Lebanese man out American and Israeli flags in his front yard;
local Muslims inundated him with threats and abuse to the extent that he said
he felt “safer in Lebanon.” The mother of a jihad terrorist in New Jersey
had the audacity to express outrage that her son was sentenced on the day
of the Boston Marathon jihad bombing. A Muslim in Dearborn called for the
killing of anti-Islam protesters.
In New York, pro-Muslim
Brotherhood Egyptians picketed the Thanksgiving Day Parade. During the American
Muslim Day Parade in New York City on September 22, 2013, Muslims marched down
Madison Avenue waving the black flags of jihad and chanting: “We are
Muslims, mighty, mighty Muslims.” It was revealed that the American Muslim
who plotted to murder thousands of people at a Christmas tree lighting ceremony
in Portland, Oregon made a jihad martyr tape to boast about the
murders he hoped to commit.
In 2013 the U.S. continued to import
jihad: it was revealed that al Qaeda “refugees” are coming to America and
going on welfare, while making videos of themselves handling heavy
weapons. An FBI informant said that “Taliban members are living in America.” He
added: “They can commit a jihad at any time, they hate America, you have an
enemy living here on American soil…they will take action to kill innocent
Americans.”
America also continued to export
jihad: an American Muslim was killed in Syria, leaving behind a video in
which he said: “We’ve come to kill anyone in our way.” A Muslim from
Chicago was arrested for planned to join the Syrian jihad. It came to
light that despite numerous law enforcement attempts to stop jihad recruitment
in Minnesota, young Muslims there were still signing up for the jihadist
group Al Shabab that carried out the deadly Kenya mall jihad attack.
And three Muslims in New York City were charged with fighting for al-Shabab.
A Florida imam, Hafiz Khan, was found guilty of funneling money to the
Taliban.
Yet despite all this evidence (and
there is so much more) of jihad activity in this country and the Islamization
of America – and also in keeping with that Islamization – the U.S. Trademark
Office denied our attempt to trademark the name “Stop Islamization of America”
on the grounds that it was “demeaning” to Muslims. Apparently the millions of
Muslims who successfully fought against the Islamization of Egypt by the Muslim
Brotherhood were demeaning themselves. We are appealing this ruling.
And some people are fighting back.
Although Missouri’s Democratic Governor Nixonvetoed an anti-Sharia
bill, the North Carolina Senate passed one, as did the full
Oklahoma State Senate, and the Alabama State Senate. Meanwhile, AFDI has
proposed an 18-point platform to stop the Islamization of America.
Send it to your Congressmen and Senators.
Source: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/01/09/The-Islamization-of-America-in-2013
http://www.teaparty.org/islamization-america-2013-33022/#sthash.vxzx6TYN.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment