Written by Ron Paul Sunday January 5, 2014
Remember Fallujah? Shortly after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the US military
fired on unarmed protestors, killing as many as 20 and wounding dozens. In
retaliation, local Iraqis attacked a convoy of US military contractors, killing
four. The US then launched a full attack on Fallujah to regain control, which
left perhaps 700 Iraqis dead and the city virtually destroyed.
According to press reports last weekend, Fallujah is now under the control of
al-Qaeda affiliates. The Anbar province, where Fallujah is located, is under
siege by al-Qaeda. During the 2007 “surge,” more than 1,000 US troops were
killed “pacifying” the Anbar province. Although al-Qaeda was not in Iraq
before the US invasion, it is now conducting its own surge in Anbar.
For Iraq, the US “liberation” is proving far worse than the authoritarianism of
Saddam Hussein, and it keeps getting worse. Last year was Iraq’s deadliest in
five years. In 2013, fighting and bomb blasts claimed the lives of 7,818
civilians and 1,050 members of the security forces. In December alone nearly a
thousand people were killed.
I remember sitting through many hearings in the House International Relations
Committee praising the “surge,” which we were told secured a US victory in
Iraq. They also praised the so-called “Awakening,” which was really an
agreement by insurgents to stop fighting in exchange for US dollars. I always
wondered what would happen when those dollars stopped coming.
Where are the surge and awakening cheerleaders now?
One of them, Richard Perle, was interviewed last year on NPR and asked whether
the Iraq invasion that he pushed was worth it. He replied:
I've got to say I think that is not a
reasonable question. What we did at the time was done in the belief that it was
necessary to protect this nation. You can't a decade later go back and say,
well, we shouldn't have done that.
Many of us were saying all along that we shouldn’t have
done that – before we did it. Unfortunately the Bush Administration took the
advice of the neocons pushing for war and promising it would be a “cakewalk.”
We continue to see the results of that terrible mistake, and it is only getting
worse.
Last month the US shipped nearly a hundred air-to-ground missiles to the Iraqi
air force to help combat the surging al-Qaeda. Ironically, the same al-Qaeda
groups the US is helping the Iraqis combat are benefiting from the US covert
and overt war to overthrow Assad next door in Syria. Why can’t the US
government learn from its mistakes?
The neocons may be on the run from their earlier positions on Iraq, but that
does not mean they have given up. They were the ones pushing for an attack on
Syria this summer. Thankfully they were not successful. They are now making
every effort to derail President Obama’s efforts to negotiate with the
Iranians. Just last week William Kristol urged Israel to attack Iran with the
hope we would then get involved. Neoconservative Senators from both parties
recently introduced the Nuclear Weapon Free Iran Act of 2013, which would also
bring us back on war-footing with Iran.
Next time the neocons tell us we must attack, just think “Iraq.”
Comments:
I wonder how long it will take before all the military
equipment we left in Afghanistan is turned against us. I have long thought that
all of our military actions since Korea should have been billed to “military
foreign aid”. Even World War I and World War II were interventions in foreign
wars we were pulled into by being attacked.
Defense, to me, is military actions taken to prevent invasion and harm. We apparently don’t do that.
Our own government is responsible for exporting our jobs,
weakening our economy and making us vulnerable.
We need to change direction. Excuses
and distractions are counterproductive.
We need to focus on increasing U.S. production of what is needed and
remove all obstacles to returning to full employment. We need to dig our way out of this hole before
the international banksters fund another war.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA tea Party Leader
Remember Fallujah? Shortly after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the US military fired on unarmed protestors, killing as many as 20 and wounding dozens. In retaliation, local Iraqis attacked a convoy of US military contractors, killing four. The US then launched a full attack on Fallujah to regain control, which left perhaps 700 Iraqis dead and the city virtually destroyed.
According to press reports last weekend, Fallujah is now under the control of al-Qaeda affiliates. The Anbar province, where Fallujah is located, is under siege by al-Qaeda. During the 2007 “surge,” more than 1,000 US troops were killed “pacifying” the Anbar province. Although al-Qaeda was not in Iraq before the US invasion, it is now conducting its own surge in Anbar.
For Iraq, the US “liberation” is proving far worse than the authoritarianism of Saddam Hussein, and it keeps getting worse. Last year was Iraq’s deadliest in five years. In 2013, fighting and bomb blasts claimed the lives of 7,818 civilians and 1,050 members of the security forces. In December alone nearly a thousand people were killed.
I remember sitting through many hearings in the House International Relations Committee praising the “surge,” which we were told secured a US victory in Iraq. They also praised the so-called “Awakening,” which was really an agreement by insurgents to stop fighting in exchange for US dollars. I always wondered what would happen when those dollars stopped coming.
Where are the surge and awakening cheerleaders now?
One of them, Richard Perle, was interviewed last year on NPR and asked whether the Iraq invasion that he pushed was worth it. He replied:
Last month the US shipped nearly a hundred air-to-ground missiles to the Iraqi air force to help combat the surging al-Qaeda. Ironically, the same al-Qaeda groups the US is helping the Iraqis combat are benefiting from the US covert and overt war to overthrow Assad next door in Syria. Why can’t the US government learn from its mistakes?
The neocons may be on the run from their earlier positions on Iraq, but that does not mean they have given up. They were the ones pushing for an attack on Syria this summer. Thankfully they were not successful. They are now making every effort to derail President Obama’s efforts to negotiate with the Iranians. Just last week William Kristol urged Israel to attack Iran with the hope we would then get involved. Neoconservative Senators from both parties recently introduced the Nuclear Weapon Free Iran Act of 2013, which would also bring us back on war-footing with Iran.
Next time the neocons tell us we must attack, just think “Iraq.”
No comments:
Post a Comment