by DICK MORRIS
Published on TheHill.com on September 23, 2014
Good for President Obama for bombing ISIS. And good that
this is no token bombing but a real, full-scale air offensive. And good that he
has enlisted other Arab countries in the effort; even if they don't drop the
bombs themselves, it could mean an end to their financing of terrorism.
But we should be bombing the oil fields the Islamic State in
Iraq and Syria (ISIS) controls as well. ISIS fuels its war machine by pumping
and selling between $1 million and $3 million a day from captured oil fields.
We need to cut off the money. We need to bomb their oil fields.
Some say they worry about destroying Iraq's oil industry.
But Iraq pumps almost 3 million barrels each day. Losing 150,000 won't cause
much of a dent.
Others worry about leaving too large an American footprint
in the region should we do something as dramatic as attacking the oil area. But
how could we be more dramatic than we have been in the last two days?
The ecological damage from disabling ISIS's oil production
will certainly be far less than when Saddam Hussein set fire to Kuwait's oil
fields. Kuwait produces 2.5 million barrels per day, as opposed to an estimated
maximum of 150,000 barrels from the ISIS fields.
When Hussein sabotaged the Kuwaiti oil fields during his
invasion in the early 1990s, it increased global greenhouse emissions by less
than 2 percent and caused a cloud cover over the Arabian Peninsula for only a
few weeks. There was no lasting ecological damage despite fears of a nuclear
winter.
Haven't we had enough of fighting with one hand tied behind
our backs? Why risk casualties by sending in our soldiers when we can cripple
the finances that are at the core of ISIS?
There are those in ISIS who are religious fanatics who will
go on fighting without funds. But the bulk of the terror group's forces are
paid soldiers, and their array of modern weapons don't come cheap (beyond what
they can steal from us).
By assembling a coalition of Arabian Peninsula emirates and
kingdoms, led by Saudi Arabia, Obama has likely assured that national financing
of ISIS from these sources will dry up. But intelligence reports suggest that
ISIS has outgrown its dependence on aid from abroad and now gets its funding
from exploiting the resources of the territory it has captured. This revenue
comes from bank deposits in captured banks, kidnapping and ransom payments and,
above all, oil.
With its principal source of revenue so vulnerable, we
should immediately proceed to cut if off.
Efforts to stop purchasers from buying ISIS oil will likely
prove unavailing. ISIS sells its oil at a steep discount off global prices --
about two-thirds less -- so the incentives for buying this fungible commodity
will likely vitiate our diplomatic efforts to curb sales.
Bombing truck convoys or the roads leading out of the oil
fields is a hit-or-miss proposition and unlikely to deal a lethal blow to this
source of revenue. But bombing the oil fields themselves would kill the snake
by cutting off its head.
Obama is to be commended for abstaining from half measures
in his aerial attack. But air power alone won't do it. We need either to cut
off ISIS funding or send in our own ground troops. It's best to strike them in
their wallets without any loss of American life.
View my most recent videos in case you missed them!
Why The President Pushes ObamaCare As Hard As He Does - Dick
Morris TV: Lunch Alert!
Obama's Plan To Change America Through Immigration - Dick
Morris TV: Lunch Alert!
Obama's Real Motive: What Is He Really Up To? Dick Morris
TV: Lunch Alert!
The 6th Year Fiasco: How Presidents Lose Congress In Their
2nd Term - Dick Morris TV: History Video!
Hillary Protests Terrorist Attacks On Women, Silent On NFL
Domestic Violence - Dick Morris TV: Lunch Alert!
No comments:
Post a Comment