'Nervous'
Jeb defends Poppy Bush's 'new world order'm, 'It might mean something different to you than it means to me',
by Leo Hohmann, 2/4/16, WND
Jeb Bush found himself in the awkward position
of having to answer for his father’s legendary statements on the need to create
a “new world order.”
The topic was raised by a questioner at a
town-hall meeting in Laconia, New Hampshire, Wednesday where Bush was
campaigning for next week’s GOP primary.
A man stood up and asked the former Florida
governor: “Your father spoke of a new world order. If elected, specifically,
how will you continue to move the country toward this goal?”
Bush seemed taken aback, stumbling over his
words and, at first, refusing to answer the question.
“I don’t know. I don’t have any intention to,
uh, lead… I don’t know what that means to you so I’m not going to answer it. It
makes me nervous to… It might mean something different to you than it means to
me.”
But he quickly found his footing and provided a
long, rambling explanation of national security and the importance of the
United States staying “engaged” in the world.
“I believe that the priority of the president of
the United States is to keep us safe. Period. Over and out,” he said. “And the
way you do that is by leading in the world, by engaging the world.”
Watch Jeb Bush answer a New Hampshire voter’s
question about the “new world order’:
"We can't build walls around to protect us
from all the goings on around the world," he continued. "We have to
engage. And today in America, today in the world, our friends no longer think
we have their back. And our enemies no longer fear us. And so we have more
insecurity than we had before. I think if you look at the lessons of history,
when the United States is engaged, building alliances, like NATO, building the
support through the OCEAN countries for example. Making sure people know that
it's in our security interests, for our engagement, that we're doing this for
our security but we're going to be there consistently.
"If that's the new world order, I'm all for
it. I don't know. Tell me what you mean by it."
The man restated his question about Bush's
father but his words cannot be heard on the video because he was not given a
microphone.
Jeb Bush responded:
"Well what he (the first President Bush)
said was the end of, the fall of, the Soviet Union, which he managed
magnificently, created this new world order where the United States needed to
stay engaged, needed to stay involved. And when we're involved we create more
security. I'm for that. That means, for example, that the next president needs
to re-establish the iron-clad relationship with Israel. Iron clad. Take it to
the bank. No gap between us. Shoulder to shoulder. Why is that important for
us? It's important because Israel is our strongest ally of course, in the
Middle East. It's also important because the Arab world, when they see the
disruption of the Israel-U.S. relationship, they say, 'We're not going to be
able to get a deal. If Israel can't get a deal, you know, with the U.S., how
can we do it?'"
But a closer look at the first President Bush's
famous "new world order" speech seems to go well beyond his son's
understanding of the term, or at least his recollection or willingness to
repeat the terms of this new international order.
So, what exactly did Jeb's father say about this
controversial topic?
Here is President George Herbert Walker Bush
speaking from the Oval Office on Jan. 16, 1991, about his now-famous "new
world order."
"We have before us the opportunity to forge
for ourselves and for future generations, a new world order, a world where the
rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we
are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order.
An order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to
fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders."
Watch video of President George H.W. Bush
defining his vision of the coveted "new world order."
President Clinton also spoke repeatedly of the
new world order, and even Jeb's brother, President George W. Bush, referred to
it. Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has talked incessantly of
creating a new world order.
But for Jeb Bush, the term made him
"nervous" and he proceeded to give a long-winded answer that avoided
difficult issues like how much sway the United Nations should be given over
U.S. foreign and domestic policy.
He focused instead on the need to cultivate
close relations with allies and to rebuke enemies like Iran but avoided the
sticky issue of which entity should serve as the primary mechanism for
implementing the new world order – the U.S., the U.N. or some other body?
Jeb never mentioned the U.N., its founders or
financial backers. If he had, it would have required him to talk about some
questionable characters, such as the globalist Rockefeller family that donated
the real estate for the United Nations in New York City, or British eugenicist
and Planned Parenthood supporter Julian Huxley, who was instrumental in the
creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization or UNESCO.
It is this organization, UNESCO, that provided
the bedrock principles for the Common Core educational standards that Jeb Bush
has enthusiastically supported.
He might have also mentioned the United Nations'
Agenda 2030 manifesto that was approved by world leaders in September. This
document goes into great detail on the importance of open borders and the
rights of migrants, which Jeb has also enthusiastically supported.
Goal No. 10 is to “reduce inequality within and
among countries,” with the buzzword “inequality” being a euphemism for wealth
redistribution.
The document states that one of the ways to
achieve the U.N.’s desired equality is to, “Facilitate orderly, safe, regular
and responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementation
of planned and well-managed migration policies.”
In other words, every impoverished person living
in an undeveloped Third World country has the right under this U.N. document to
migrate to a developed country.
Goal No. 16 goes a step further calling for
“peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development” and providing
access to justice for all. One of the methods listed as critical for the
achievement of this goal is to “provide legal identity for all, including birth
registration” of all babies.
Jeb Bush did mention Russia's "invasion of
Ukraine" and the allowing of ISIS to create a caliphate as events that
would have been dealt with "quietly" with a "big stick,"
under his leadership, as opposed to with Obama's "grandiose language"
and then doing nothing.
"When we don't confront the ambitions of
Iran but give the perception that we're changing teams and now are supportive
more of Iran than we are of the Sunni Arab nations, that creates massive
instability in the world," Jeb Bush said in New Hampshire Wednesday.
"We need to get back in the game to say, 'We have your back. We're not the
world's policemen but we have your back, because it's in our security interests
that you have stability.' "
http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/nervous-jeb-defends-poppy-bushs-new-world-order/?cat_orig=world
Comments
Jeb needs questions
about UN Agenda 21, Regionalism, Global Warming Hoax, Carbon Capture, Excessive
Immigration, Muslim Invasion, Islam taught in public schools, federal land
grabs, Open Borders, Foreign companies hiring refugees, TTP, $300 trillion
Derivative Crash, paying off the National Debt and US Sovereignty.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA
Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment