ICYMI:
CNS News: $365,694,500,000: U.S. Merchandise Trade Deficit With China Hit
Record In 2015
“As calculated by the Census Bureau, the U.S. ran an overall
trade deficit in goods in 2015 of $736.1719 billion… The largest contributor to
that deficit was China and its $365,694,500,000 bilateral deficit with the U.S.
The second largest contributor was Germany, with whom the U.S. ran a
$74,192,600,000 merchandise trade deficit. The third largest contributor was
Japan, with whom the U.S. ran a $68,647,900,000 merchandise trade deficit. The
fourth was Mexico, with whom the U.S. ran a $58,363,700,000 merchandise trade
deficit. And the fifth was Vietnam, with whom the U.S. ran a $30,921,400,000.”
$365,694,500,000: U.S. Merchandise Trade Deficit With China
Hit Record In 2015 By Terence P. Jeffrey, 2/9/16
<http://cnsnews.com/author/terence-p-jeffrey>
(CNSNews.com) - The merchandise trade deficit that the
United States ran with China in 2015 hit a record high of $365,694,000,000,
according to data released Friday by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of
Economic Analysis.
<http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/trade/2016/pdf/trad1215.pdf>
<http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html>
“The deficit with China increased $22.6 billion to $365.7
billion in 2015,” the BEA said in a press release
<http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/trade/2016/pdf/trad1215.pdf>.
“Exports decreased $7.5 billion to $116.2 billion and
imports increased $15.1 billion to $481.9 billion.”
The $22,615,700,000 increase in the merchandise trade
deficit the U.S. ran with China last year was a 6.6-percent jump from the
$343,078,800,000 merchandise trade deficit the U.S. ran with China in 2014.
[http://www.cnsnews.com/s3/files/styles/content_100p/s3/china_trade_deficit-current_dollars.jpg?itok=qmPNfjyP]
The merchandise trade balance deals only with the goods that
are imported and exported between the two countries. It does not include the
export and import of services.
In recent years, according to the Bureau of Economic
Analysis, the U.S. has run a surplus in its exchange of services with China,
while running a much larger deficit in its exchange of goods.
In 2014, for example, the U.S. ran a $28.077 billion surplus
in services traded with China, according to BEA. That caused the overall 2014
U.S. goods-and-services trade deficit with China—which was $315.116 billion—to
be less than the 2014 merchandise trade deficit of $343,078,800,000.
The BEA is scheduled to release the 2015 balance of trade in
services with China (and other countries) on March 4.
The Census Bureau has published U.S.-China export and import
numbers on goods going back to 1985.
<http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html>.
During the past thirty years, the annual value of U.S.-China
trade has risen dramatically. So, too, has the gap between the value of the
Chinese goods imported into the U.S. and the U.S. goods exported to China.
In 1985, according to the Census Bureau, the U.S. exported
$3.8557 billion in goods to China and imported 3.8617 billion back—running a
deficit of only $6,000,000.
By 1995, the U.S. was exporting $11.7537 billion from China
while importing $45.5432 billion—running a deficit of $33.7895.
By 2005, the U.S. was exporting $41.1920 billion to China
while importing 243.4701 billion from China—running a deficit of $202.2781
billion.
In 2015, the Census Bureau reported Friday, the U.S.
exported $116.1863 in goods to China while importing $481.8808 billion—running
a merchandise trade deficit with China of $365.6945 billion.
Even when the historical annual merchandise trade deficits
that the U.S. has run with China are adjusted for inflation and put in constant
2015 dollars using the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator, the
$365.6945 billion merchandise trade deficit the U.S. ran with China last year
is still the largest recorded by the Census Bureau.
[http://www.cnsnews.com/s3/files/styles/content_100p/s3/china_trade_deficit-constant_2015_dollars.jpg?itok=kxG9H49d]
“For the past several years, the U.S. trade deficit with
China has been significantly larger than that with any other U.S. trading
partner and several trading groups,” said a Congressional Research Service
report (“China-U.S. Trade Issues" published in December.
<http://cdn.cnsnews.com/attachments/china-us_trade_issues-congressional_research_service.pdf>)
“Some analysts contend that the large U.S. trade deficit is
an indicator that the trade relationship is unbalanced, unfair, and damaging to
the U.S. economy,” said the report. “Others argue the large trade deficit with
China is more of a reflection of global supply chains, where China is often the
final point of assembly for export-oriented multinational firms.”
“A joint study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD) and the WTO,” said the CRS report, “estimated that the
U.S trade deficit in China would be reduced by 25% (in 2009) if bilateral trade
flows were measured according to the value-added that occurred in each country
before it was exported.”
As calculated by the Census Bureau, the U.S. ran an overall
trade deficit in goods in 2015 of $736.1719 billion.
The largest contributor to that deficit was China and its
$365,694,500,000 bilateral deficit with the U.S. The second largest contributor
was Germany, with whom the U.S. ran a $74,192,600,000 merchandise trade
deficit. The third largest contributor was Japan, with whom the U.S. ran a
$68,647,900,000 merchandise trade deficit. The fourth was Mexico, with whom the
U.S. ran a $58,363,700,000 merchandise trade deficit. And the fifth was
Vietnam, with whom the U.S. ran a $30,921,400,000.
U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) serves on four Senate
committees: Armed Services, Budget, Environment and Public Works, and
Judiciary, where he is Chairman of the Subcommittee on Immigration and the
National Interest.
Visit Sessions online at his website <http://sessions.senate.gov/public/> or via YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/user/SenatorSessions>,
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jeff-Sessions/23444 159584?ref=search>,
and Twitter <http://twitter.com/SenatorSessions>.
For further information, contact Sen. Sessions’ Press Office
at (202) 224-4124.
No comments:
Post a Comment