Submitted by Tyler Durden, 5/12/16, Submitted by Bob Livingston via Personal Liberty Digest
blog (h/t Brandon Smith at Alt-Market.com),
The
American economic system, and in fact the world’s economic system is failing, and that failure is being attributed by many on the left
(and some on the right) as a failure of capitalism.
This false notion has given rise to Bernie Sanders and his preaching of
social democracy. How has this happened? Every writer and every commentator
and every politician in America refers to the U.S. as a democracy of free
enterprise capitalism with individual privacy and property rights. This is a big laugh to any sober person.
The system and its paid politicians
still repeat high-sounding terms like “freedom of the individual” and “free
enterprise,” which sedates the madding crowd. The terms “private” and “freedom”
no longer mean what they once meant. They are cruel deceptions that fool the
mind yearning for human freedom.
The fact is that in America we have
massive regulation and regimentation. This is necessary, we are told, because
it is “in the public interest.” It all spews forth out of “democracy” as
if a Biblical word and a holy sanction. Terms like “public interest” and
“common good” are code words that
mean police state and reduced liberty.
We live in
a fiction of freedom perpetuated with semantic corruption that has evolved us into economic fascism.
Language and words that support a free society have been turned inside out.
With this propaganda reverse,
opposition has been neutralized. True
words, true meanings of patriotism and freedom have become the farce and
illusion that cover fascism.
So Sanders has attracted the millennials in droves based on the lie
that capitalism is immoral but his brand of socialism is moral because it
guarantees “equality.” These millennials tweet or
blog their discontent with the present system on their Iphones and Androids and
computers created by capitalists who got rich and then became crony capitalist
socialists or fascists.
But Sanders doesn’t distinguish
between monopoly or crony capitalism and true free-market capitalism. Free
market capitalism hasn’t existed in the U.S., or much of anywhere else for that
matter, in more than 100 years. So capitalism hasn’t failed and isn’t failing.
There is a
silent marriage between big government and big business. It exists around the world. It’s called fascism, or was in
Italy, though we have the same thing.
All governments are fronts for
monopoly capitalism, and monopoly capitalism has many names: fascism,
socialism, communism and democracy. Big business has and will promote every
ideology and philosophy known to man to disguise its madness for profits. But
one equals the other. They are all immoral systems that use the power of
government to exist and to suppress human freedom.
The only moral system is
laissez-faire capitalism; the system in which transactions between private
parties are free from government interference. It was American free market
capitalism that fueled the growth of the U.S. economic engine beginning in the
1800s and raised the standard of living around the globe, before monopoly
capitalism began to exert greater and greater control over the U.S. economic
system beginning in the mid-1800s and accelerated after the creation of the
Federal Reserve in 1913.
Sadly,
it’s not just the progressive left and ignorant millennials that oppose free
market capitalism. In any discussion forum where
laissez-faire capitalism is discussed, “conservatives” are quick to make the
disclaimer that “we must have some regulation”
or, “we can’t have unfettered capitalism.”
In truth, most so-called conservatives are really closet socialists. This is a testament to the powerful
propaganda we are subjected to.
In 1993, C. Bradley Thompson, then assistant professor of political
science at Ashland University, described the immorality of socialism and
the morality of capitalism as well as anyone I’ve read. This should be shared with anyone you know – particularly
young people who are victims of the public non-education system — who has
bought the lie that capitalism is a failed system and has embraced conventional
wisdom and Sanders’ false paradigm:
Socialism vs. capitalism: Which is the moral system?
Throughout history there have been
two basic forms of social organization: collectivism and individualism. In the
twentieth-century collectivism has taken many forms: socialism, fascism,
Nazism, welfare-statism and communism are its more notable variations. The only
social system commensurate with individualism is laissez-faire capitalism.
The extraordinary level of material
prosperity achieved by the capitalist system over the course of the last
two-hundred years is a matter of historical record. But very few people are
willing to defend capitalism as morally uplifting.
It is fashionable among college
professors, journalists, and politicians these days to sneer at the
free-enterprise system. They tell us that capitalism is base, callous,
exploitative, dehumanizing, alienating, and ultimately enslaving.
The intellectuals’ mantra runs
something like this: In theory socialism is the morally superior social system
despite its dismal record of failure in the real world. Capitalism, by
contrast, is a morally bankrupt system despite the extraordinary prosperity it
has created. In other words, capitalism at best, can only be defended on
pragmatic grounds. We tolerate it because it works.
Under socialism a ruling class of
intellectuals, bureaucrats and social planners decide what people want or what
is good for society and then use the coercive power of the State to regulate,
tax, and redistribute the wealth of those who work for a living. In other
words, socialism is a form of legalized theft.
The morality of socialism can be
summed-up in two words: envy and self-sacrifice. Envy is the desire to not only
possess another’s wealth but also the desire to see another’s wealth lowered to
the level of one’s own. Socialism’s teaching on self-sacrifice was nicely
summarized by two of its greatest defenders, Hermann Goering and Benito
Mussolini. The highest principle of Nazism (National Socialism), said Goering,
is: “Common good comes before private good.” Fascism, said Mussolini, is “a
life in which the individual, through the sacrifice of his own private
interests… realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a
man lies.”
Socialism is the social system which
institutionalizes envy and self-sacrifice: It is the social system which uses
compulsion and the organized violence of the State to expropriate wealth from
the producer class for its redistribution to the parasitical class.
Despite
the intellectuals’ psychotic hatred of capitalism, it is the only moral and just social system. Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires
human beings to deal with one another as traders — that is, as free moral
agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent.
Capitalism is the only just system
because the sole criterion that determines the value of a thing exchanged is
the free, voluntary, universal judgment of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are
anathema to the free-market system.
It is both moral and just because
the degree to which man rises or falls in society is determined by the degree
to which he uses his mind. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards
merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one’s birth or station in life.
Yes, there
are winners and losers in capitalism. The
winners are those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal,
responsible, disciplined, and efficient. The losers are those who are
shiftless, lazy, imprudent, extravagant, negligent, impractical, and
inefficient.
Capitalism
is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the
carpenter, the lawyer and the factory worker.
But how does the entrepreneurial
mind work? Have you ever wondered about the mental processes of the men and
women who invented penicillin, the internal combustion engine, the airplane,
the radio, the electric light, canned food, air conditioning, washing machines,
dishwashers, computers, etc.?
What are the characteristics of the
entrepreneur? The entrepreneur is that man or woman with unlimited drive,
initiative, insight, energy, daring creativity, optimism and ingenuity. The
entrepreneur is the man who sees in every field a potential garden, in every
seed an apple. Wealth starts with ideas in people’s heads.
The entrepreneur is therefore above
all else a man of the mind. The entrepreneur is the man who is constantly
thinking of new ways to improve the material or spiritual lives of the greatest
number of people.
And what are the social and
political conditions which encourage or inhibit the entrepreneurial mind? The
free-enterprise system is not possible without the sanctity of private
property, the freedom of contract, free trade and the rule of law.
But the one thing that the
entrepreneur values over all others is freedom — the freedom to experiment,
invent and produce. The one thing that the entrepreneur dreads is government
intervention. Government taxation and regulation are the means by which social
planners punish and restrict the man or woman of ideas.
Welfare, regulations, taxes, tariffs,
minimum-wage laws are all immoral because they use the coercive power of the
state to organize human choice and action; they’re immoral because they inhibit
or deny the freedom to choose how we live our lives; they’re immoral because
they deny our right to live as autonomous moral agents; and they’re immoral
because they deny our essential humanity. If you think this is hyperbole, stop
paying your taxes for a year or two and see what happens.
The requirements for success in a
free society demand that ordinary citizens order their lives in accordance with
certain virtues — namely, rationality, independence, industriousness,
prudence, frugality, etc. In a free capitalist society individuals must choose
for themselves how they will order their lives and the values they will pursue.
Under socialism, most of life’s decisions are made for you.
Both
socialism and capitalism have incentive programs. Under
socialism there are built-in incentives to shirk responsibility. There is no
reason to work harder than anyone else because the rewards are shared and
therefore minimal to the hard-working individual; indeed, the incentive is to
work less than others because the immediate loss is shared and therefore
minimal to the slacker.
Under capitalism, the incentive is
to work harder because each producer will receive the total value of his production — the
rewards are not shared. Simply put: socialism rewards sloth and penalizes hard work while
capitalism rewards hard work and penalizes sloth.
According
to socialist doctrine, there is a limited amount of wealth in the world that
must be divided equally between all citizens. One person’s gain under such a
system is another’s loss.
According
to the capitalist teaching, wealth has an unlimited growth potential and the fruits
of one’s labor should be retained in whole by the producer. But unlike
socialism, one person’s gain is everybody’s gain in the capitalist system.
Wealth is distributed unequally but the ship of wealth rises for everyone.
Sadly,
America is no longer a capitalist nation. We
live under what is more properly called a mixed economy — that is, an
economic system that permits private property, but only at the discretion of
government planners. A little bit of capitalism and a little bit of socialism.
When government redistributes wealth
through taxation, when it attempts to control and regulate business production
and trade, who are the winners and losers? Under this kind of economy the
winners and losers are reversed: the winners are those who scream the loudest
for a handout and the losers are those quiet citizens who work hard and pay
their taxes.
As a
consequence of our sixty-year experiment with a mixed economy and the welfare
state, America has created two new classes of citizens. The first is a debased class of dependents whose means
of survival is contingent upon the forced expropriation of wealth from working
citizens by a professional class of government social planners. The forgotten
man and woman in all of this is the quiet, hardworking, law-abiding, taxpaying
citizen who minds his or her own business but is forced to work for the
government and their serfs.
The return
of capitalism will not happen until there is a moral revolution in this
country. We must rediscover and then teach our young the virtues associated
with being free and independent citizens. Then and only then, will there be
social justice in America.
No comments:
Post a Comment