U.N. goes all-in
for unlimited migration, Hillary an
enthusiastic supporter of globalist plan for U.S. cities, by Leo Hohmann, 10/21/16, WND
The United Nations has
cooked up a “New
Urban Agenda” coming soon to a city
near you. It was unveiled this week in Quito, Ecuador, at the so-called Habitat
III conference.
And part of the plan,
enthusiastically embraced by Hillary Clinton, calls for unlimited migration
across open borders.
Migrants displaced by
war, failing economies or other hardships will be seen as having “rights” in
nations other than their own. Cities are seen as the key battlegrounds and the
U.N. conference in Quito had a lot to say about how your city will be expected
to embrace migrants of all types, from all regions of the world.
By now most Americans
who follow world events are familiar with the U.N’s plan for global governance
as envisioned by its “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” approved by
some 190 world leaders including President Obama and Pope Francis in September
2015.
This agenda includes 17
goals aimed at ending hunger, wiping out poverty and stamping out global income
inequality by “transforming
our world” through sweeping
changes ostensibly aimed at freeing cross-border “labor mobility,” among other
things.
Hillary Clinton,
anointed by Obama as his successor, said in a speech to Wall Street bankers she
envisions the U.S. as part of a single “hemispheric common market with free
trade and open borders,” according to WikiLeaks data dumps.
In another bombshell
revealed by WikiLeaks, Mrs. Clinton told Goldman Sachs bankers that Americans
who want to limit immigration are “fundamentally
un-American.” She has also called
for a 550-percent increase in the resettlement of Syrian refugees in America –
that’s 550 percent more than Obama’s vastly increased level of more than 12,000
resettled in one year.
In short, Hillary’s
agenda for cities sounds an awful lot like the U.N.’s agenda for cities as laid
out in the New
Urban Agenda document approved this week by
world leaders in Quito. “She’s totally in line with the U.N. agenda, on board
with everything they do,” says economist Patrick Wood, author of “Technocracy
Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation.”
Clinton earlier this
year announced her $135 billion “breaking
every barrier” program to transform
America’s cities. In this plan, she makes 37 pledges promising everything from
removal of blight to construction of affordable housing in areas that are
currently out of the price range of refugees, immigrants, the chronically
unemployed and under-employed. She intends to build on the “successes” of her
husband and the Obama administration in using public-private partnerships to
transform cities. Obama’s contribution in this area included his Affirmatively
Furthering Fair Housing rule, which forces grant-receiving cities to infuse
their low-crime suburban areas, deemed “too white,” with subsidized housing
marketed to low-income renters.
This fits right in with
the U.N.’s 2030 Agenda. “She’s making a pre-announcement here that she’s going
to follow the U.N. agenda,” Wood said. “She’s signaling to her fellow
globalists that she’s 100 percent on board with their agenda.”
The problem that keeps
globalists like Obama and Clinton up at night is how to implement the sweeping
changes laid out in the U.N. 2030 Agenda last September at the global
sustainability summit in New York.
That’s where Habitat III
comes into play. It’s called the U.N. Conference on Housing and Sustainable
Development or “Habitat III” for short. Its focus is on the world’s cities.
Largest U.N. conference
ever
Habitat III was attended
by a staggering 50,000 people including more than 200 mayors and another 140
city delegations.
The sole purpose of this
conference is to approve a 24-page document called the New Urban Agenda. “The
only purpose of the conference is to rubber stamp this document and elevate it
and lift it up to the world,” said Wood. “And right now it looks like they are.
Everybody. All the nations.”
In this document lies
the globalists’ plans for cities. All cities. Big, small, even tiny cities.
Every American who lives in a city will at some point see the fruits of the
plan the U.N. has in store for the world, says Wood, an expert on global
governance and the technocracy movement.
The Habitat conference
convenes only once every 20 years but when it does, it leaves a trail of
anti-capitalist, anti-liberty “global standards” in its wake, says Wood. These
are the standards by which the U.N. wants each and every city in the world to
be operated. They come packaged as “non-binding” and Congress never approves
them.
Yet, somehow, the global
standards coming out of the major U.N. conferences always seem to filter down
to even the smallest American hamlet. How? Through federal grants. Any city
that accepts federal grants will at some point be required to implement the
practices that the U.N. has declared “sustainable.”
‘Inclusive’ by design,
coercive by default
The buzzword in the New
Urban Agenda is “inclusive” or “inclusivity.” This concept has a long history
with global elites and technocrats.
The definition of
“technocracy” as used by the original technocrats back 1938 was “the science of
social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism, to
produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.” That’s
according to The Technocrat magazine.
“They use the word
‘entire’ twice in that definition so I’m really not surprised we see it showing
up in these conferences today,” Wood said. “Their intent is to create a net
that will catch 100 percent of the people.”
The word “inclusive” or
“inclusivity” appear in the New Urban Agenda document no fewer than 36 times. “There
is no exclusion,” Wood says. “If you read the document, you’ll find for instance under item 6a,
‘transformative commitments,’ the statement starts out ‘leave no one behind.'”
That same phrase, leave
no one behind, is in the U.N.’s 2030 Agenda. “In fact just about everywhere you
go now at the U.N. you’ll find this concept,” Wood said. “It’s a little
disturbing.”
Wood says the U.N. is
resurrecting an old concept that fizzled in the early days of the technocracy
movement. Its time hadn’t arrived yet, back in the 1930s, but now things are
different. The world is run by big data and the world is eager to embraced a
set of globalized, one-world standards for everything, whether it be Common
Core education standards, globalized police standards that Attorney General
Loretta Lynch announced at the U.N. last fall in the form of the Strong Cities
Network, or global standards for healthcare, ala Obamacare. You name it, the
United Nations wants to standardize it.
The next big hurdle in
the race to standardize the world is the issue of immigration. Point 42 on page
7 of the New
Urban Agenda talks about cities
providing opportunities for dialogue, “paying particular attention to the
potential contributions” of women and children, the elderly and disabled,
“refugees and internally displaced persons and migrants, regardless of
migration status, and without discrimination based on race, religion,
ethnicity, or socio-economic status.”
Everyone is welcome
Wood notes that, in
America, that would mean exactly what John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign manager,
has already said — that anyone with a driver’s license should be allowed to
vote. “This is the way I read it,” he said. “It doesn’t matter if they’re legal
or illegal, wanted or unwanted, jihadists or non-jihadists, sick or healthy. If
they show up in your country, they must participate in the affairs of that
country immediately, whatever country they find themselves in.”
The preamble to the New
Urban Agenda says cities are the “key to tackling global challenges.” “So these people are
viewing cities as the key ingredient right now to implementing sustainable
development, and they say this battle for sustainability will be won or lost in
the cities.”
And the U.N. document
goes on to state that this agenda is “the first step for operationalizing
sustainable development in an integrated and coordinated way at the global,
national, subnational, and local levels.”
In essence, it’s a
roadmap to global governance where American cities will no longer get their
direction from elected officials representing them on the city council, or even
the state legislature, but the United Nations itself. The local councils will
likely not even know that the rules they are following in order to qualify for
federal grants are tied to United Nations’ standards for sustainability.
Cities committing to ‘a
paradigm shift’
The document talks about
cities committing to “a paradigm shift” in the way they “plan, develop and
manage urban development.”
“It’s top to bottom,”
Wood said. “They’re saying it’s going to be a top-down implementation. But for
all the gains that sustainable development have made since 1992, there’s been a
complaint that it hasn’t gone fast enough or far enough, and that it’s not
inclusive enough, that some pockets have been left out. So, what they’re saying
here is that this New Urban Agenda document is really, in their minds, the
first step for operationalizing it. First step to making sustainable
development completely operational. That’s huge.”
Wallace Henley, a
journalist and former aide in the Nixon White House who went on to become a
Christian pastor and who has written extensively on globalism, said the U.N. is
making a full-on assault against the American system of government, which
requires federalism, states’ rights and separation of powers.
“The U.N. is a glaring
example of the inevitable course of bureaucracies. Like kudzu in Alabama, a
tiny seed will inevitably spread until it controls the whole of a hillside,”
Henley, author of “God
and Churchhill,” told WND in an email.
And he, like Wood, sees
Hillary Clinton in the thick of the battle, fighting on the side of the
globalists, not America first. “The leftist-progressive
philosophy is the fertilizer. Agencies sprout and grow, and bring forth policy
confabs like Habitat III. The conferences then produce white papers that
ultimately become the source of policies,” he said. “It is a
leftist-progressivist dream.”
“Sustainability” is a
code word for regulatory authority, Henley said, and that is the suffocating
vine that chokes out everything else.
“This meshes perfectly
with the New Globalism and its dream of a world without borders. Anything can
be done in the name of a ‘sustainable’ future, including the ‘humanitarian’
invasion of a sovereign state – but only if its leaders embrace the same
left-progressive philosophy as the bureaucracies headquartered in New York.
This makes a Hillary Clinton presidency even more foreboding,” he said.
And these “progressives”
include many in the Republican Party who are now shilling for Clinton, such as
House Speaker Paul Ryan and Arizona Sen. John McCain. Ryan, according to an
article by Breitbart’s
Julia Hahn, has been working hand
in hand with the Clinton campaign for months.
“The true conservative
seeks preservation of liberty-nurturing principles, and the sustenance of
values that resist the control of the bureaucrats and guarantee freedom from a
globalist hegemon in the form of the U.N.,” Henley said
Eric Voegelin’s 1975
book, “From Enlightenment to Revolution,” describes with amazing prescience the
“line of progress” according to the revolutionaries who drive what Henley calls
the New Globalism, from the local to the global, from the individual to the
mass of humanity, from nation-states to a concentrated global power. “This is
the big picture of which Habitat III and its New Urban Agenda is a part.”
http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/u-n-goes-all-in-for-unlimited-migration/
No comments:
Post a Comment