New NAFTA: Text of U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement
(USMCA) Revealed, Christian
Gomez
Late Sunday night, Canada agreed
to join the new renegotiated NAFTA, officially named the United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, meeting the self-imposed midnight
deadline in order to complete an agreement in time for current Mexican
President Enrique Peña Nieto to sign it before he leaves office on December 1.
In a joint statement United States Trade Representative
Robert Lighthizer and Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland
said: Today, Canada and the United States reached an agreement, alongside
Mexico, on a new, modernized trade agreement for the 21st Century: the United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). USMCA will give our workers, farmers,
ranchers and businesses a high-standard trade agreement that will result in
freer markets, fairer trade and robust economic growth in our region. It will
strengthen the middle class and create good, well-paying jobs and new opportunities for the
nearly half billion people who call North America home. We look forward to further deepening our
close economic ties when this new agreement enters into force. We would like to thank Mexican Economy
Secretary Ildefonso Guajardo for his close collaboration over the past 13
months.
Within hours of their announcement, the
full text of the agreement was posted on the USTR website and can be read here.
The USMCA has a total of 34 chapters, 12
more than the original 1994 NAFTA, which only had 22 chapters. Unlike the 1994
NAFTA, the USMCA includes chapters on labor, the environment, anticorruption,
regulatory policy, competitiveness, and Mexico's exclusive ownership of its gasoline
and natural gas resources, among others.
The following is a list of the USMCA's
34 chapters, along with their annexes:
2. National Treatment and Market
Access for Goods (US Tariff Schedule, US TRQ Appendix, MX Tariff Schedule, CA Tariff Schedule, CA TRQ Appendix)
3. Agriculture (Agriculture Chapter, Mexico-US Bilateral Annex, Canada-US Bilateral Annex, Alcohol Annex, Proprietary Food Formulas Annex)
10. Trade Remedies
12. Sectoral Annexes
14. Investment
16. Temporary Entry
19. Digital Trade
23. Labor
24. Environment
26. Competitiveness
27. Anticorruption
34. Final Provisions
In total, the USMCA is a whopping 1,809
pages —1,572 pages for the treaty itself, 214 pages for annexes, and 23 pages
for side letters. In comparison, NAFTA was over 1,700 pages long — 741
pages for the treaty itself, 348 pages for annexes, and 619 pages for
additional footnotes and explanations.
Once in force, the agreement will have a
16-year life, after which it will automatically be terminated unless the countries
agree to renew the agreement for another 16 years. According to Article 34.7 of
Chapter 34, entitled “Final Provisions,” the "Agreement shall terminate 16
years after the date of its entry into force, unless each Party confirms it
wishes to continue the Agreement for a new 16-year
term." In other words, if the USMCA goes into effect in 2019, the
agreement would not terminate until the year 2035 unless it is renewed for
another 16 years, at which point it would not expire until 2051.
However, the United States, Mexico, and
Canada will have an opportunity to review the agreement every six years, at
which time they can decide whether to renew it or not, or propose changes. If
during the review, the head of state of one of the countries expresses a desire
to remain in the agreement, their agreement will be given an automatic renewal.
Countries also have the opportunity to withdraw from the agreement with a
six-month written notice. Even if one country withdraws, the agreement remains
in effect for the other countries.
According to Article 34.6, "A Party
may withdraw from this Agreement by providing written notice of withdrawal to
the other Parties. A withdrawal shall take effect six months after a Party
provides written notice to the other Parties. If a Party withdraws, the
Agreement shall remain in force for the remaining Parties."
Submission
to International Authority - Consistent
with other globalist schemes, the USMCA follows the “rules-based system” of
compliance to international authorities such as the World Trade Organization,
International Labor Organization, a plethora of United Nations conventions
including the Law of Sea treaty, and the furtherance of “sustainable
development,” which is mentioned no less than six times in the environment
chapter.
One example of the USMCA's complete
subordination to international authority can be found in Article 24.18 of the
new environment chapter, regarding fisheries, which states in part:
3. Each Party shall base its fisheries
management system on the best scientific evidence available and on
internationally recognized best practices for fisheries management and
conservation as reflected in the relevant provisions of
international instruments aimed at ensuring the sustainable use and
conservation of marine species.
The footnote below for that section
defines what exactly those "international instruments" are,
stating: These instruments include, among others, and as they may apply,
United
Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the United
Nations Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of December 1982 relating
to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly
Migratory Fish Stocks, done at New York, December 4, 1995
(UN Fish Stocks Agreement), the FAO
Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, the 1993
FAO Agreement to Promote Compliance with International Conservation and
Management Measures by Fishing Vessels on the High Seas(Compliance Agreement), done at Rome,
November 24, 1993, the 2001
FAO International Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter, and Eliminate Illegal,
Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU Fishing), and the 2009 Agreement on Port State Measures to
Prevent, Deter, and Eliminate IUU Fishing.
Toward
a North American Union - In
a bold step toward a potential North American Union, the USMCA establishes a
new governing international bureaucracy. Chapter 30 of the agreement
establishes the creation of a Free Trade Commission as a regional governing
bureaucracy overseeing various lower regional committees. Article 30, section
1, of the agreement states, “The Parties hereby establish a Free Trade
Commission, composed of government representatives of each Party at the level
of Ministers or their designees.” Article 30, section 2, outlines the various
functions and powers of the Free Trade Commission as follows:
1. The Commission shall:
(a) consider matters relating to the
implementation or operation of this Agreement;
(b) consider proposals to amend or modify this Agreement;(c) supervise the work of committees, working groups, and other subsidiary bodies established under this Agreement;
(d) consider ways to further enhance trade and investment between the Parties;
(e) adopt and update the Rules of Procedure and Code of conduct ; and
(f) review the roster established under Article 31.8 (Roster and Qualifications
of Panelists) every three years and, when appropriate, constitute a new
roster.
(f) review the roster established under Article 31.8 (Roster and Qualifications of Panelists) every three years and, when appropriate, constitute a new roster.
The Free Trade Commission requires the
United States, Mexico, and Canada to “establish and oversee a Secretariat
comprising national Sections.” All three countries will be responsible for
establishing and maintaining a “permanent office of its Section and be
responsible for its operation and costs.” The role of the Secretariat will be
to assist and promote the work of the Commission, provide administrative
assistance to any dispute-settlement panels, and to cover the costs and
expenses for panelists, assistants, and experts involved in a dispute-settlement
proceeding.
Beneath the Free Trade Commission, the
USMCA authorizes all three countries to establish the following subordinate
committees:
• Committee on Agricultural Trade,
• Committee on Rules of Origin and Origin Procedures,
• Committee on Textile and Apparel Trade Matters,
• Customs and Trade Facilitation Committee,
• Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade,
• Committee on Government Procurement,
• Committee on Transportation Services,
• Committee on Financial Services,
• Committee on Telecommunications,
• Committee on Intellectual Property Rights,
• Committee on State-Owned Enterprises and Designated Monopolies,
• Environment Committee,
• Committee on SME (Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises) Issues,
• North American Competitiveness Committee,
• Committee on Good Regulatory Practices, and an
• Advisory Committee on Private Commercial Disputes
• Committee on Textile and Apparel Trade Matters,
• Customs and Trade Facilitation Committee,
• Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade,
• Committee on Government Procurement,
• Committee on Transportation Services,
• Committee on Financial Services,
• Committee on Telecommunications,
• Committee on Intellectual Property Rights,
• Committee on State-Owned Enterprises and Designated Monopolies,
• Environment Committee,
• Committee on SME (Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises) Issues,
• North American Competitiveness Committee,
• Committee on Good Regulatory Practices, and an
• Advisory Committee on Private Commercial Disputes
The specific functions for each
committee are outlined in their corresponding chapters. Nevertheless, all of
these committees are to be comprised of representatives from the governments of
all three countries. The committees are responsible for overseeing and helping
to implement the agreement in their particular area. They will also be tasked
with addressing any issues that arise under their area.
Committees will meet regularly or on an
annual basis, and they are supposed to help encourage or foster greater
cooperation and trade among all three countries in their given areas.
Committees can also propose changes or revisions to the chapter in the agreement
that corresponds to their area. All of the committees’ work, discussions,
findings, and recommendations are to be submitted to the Free Trade Commission
for consideration.
And much like the TPP Commission, the
Free Trade Commission can make changes to the USMCA without the consent of
Congress. In fact, the agreement completely undermines Congress' Constitutional
Article I, Section 8 power to regulate trade with foreign nations, such as
Mexico and Canada, and to impose tariffs on them should the need arise, as in
the case of national security.
The Free Trade Commission would also
have the power to consider or adopt any changes to a country's scheduled tariff
commitments by accelerating the elimination of tariffs or by making
“adjustments to the Tariff Preferential Levels established in Chapter 6
(Textile and Apparel Goods).”
Among the most revealing and
unsurprising aspects of these transnational committees, which underscores the
value of the USMCA to the Deep State, is the stated objective of the North
American Competitiveness Committee.
In the USMCA's Chapter 26 on competitiveness,
all three countries agree to establish a Committee on Competitiveness, or a
North American Competitiveness Committee, with “a view to promoting further
economic integration among the Parties and enhancing the competitiveness of
North American exports.” In other words, the committee’s objective is not about
making the United States, Mexico, and Canada more competitive with each other,
but making the three of them as a bloc more competitive with the rest of the
world, hence its function to promote “further economic integration” between the
three countries.
USMCA will not help the United States,
Mexico, or Canada be more competitive individually or boost any one of three
countries' economies. The Deep State does not wish for the United States alone
to be competitive with the rest of the world, or maintain global economic
dominance; instead it must surrender its sovereignty — along with that of its
neighbors — to a new supranational body that will supposedly protect “North
American” jobs, industry, and economy.
Rather than putting “America first,” as
President Trump has repeatedly promised, or to “Make America Great Again,” his
new NAFTA, the USMCA, demotes the United States to second tier in pursuit of
making North America
great. The USMCA makes North America great at the expense of the United States
and its national sovereignty.
Under this scheme, the United States
will be required to surrender its sovereignty in order for a chance to be a
member of the winning team. Americans have been lied to and duped by their
government into believing that their elected leaders are working in their
interest, only to subordinate America's interests to those of North America.
It's only a matter of time before the same charade is pulled on North America
in order to integrate it with the world's other regional trade blocs (i.e. the
European Union, African Union, Union of South America, Eurasian Economic Union,
RCEP, TPP, T-TIP) into one world economic union and commission, under the
auspices of the United Nations and the World Trade Organization.
The result of “promoting further
economic integration” among the United States, Mexico, and Canada,
necessitating the creation of an all-powerful, un-elected so-called Free Trade
Commission will be nothing less than a North American Union, and that alone
should motivate patriotic Americans to vehemently reject the new United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
Far from making America great again, the
USMCA is a bag of goodies for globalists and a death certificate for American
national sovereignty.
Comments
If US corporations
want to continue to trade with Mexico and Canada, they will need to know that
their disputes will not be settled in US courts. We need to know who will be assigned to run
these courts before we can believe that this is not the re-start of another EU.
US Voters do not want
Congress to entangle the US in UN dictates.
We do not trust legislators and government entities we can’t fire. We don’t want to become anything like the EU.
We want very small, very limited government at all levels.
I think this agreement is the best we could get. After we have re-established viable manufacturing we can keep bringing more back.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody
GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment