USMCA Conclusions

US Voters need to read the “fine print” in the USMCA, before it is ratified by the US Congress. Voters need to thoroughly examine the “Free Trade Commission” buried in the agreement. 

We need to ensure that USMCA cannot be construed as a continuation of the North American Union as a governing entity.  We should expect that eventually the US Mexico agreement will be separated from the US Canada agreement and these agreements could become bi-lateral. 

We need to know that the “Free Trade Commission” will replace US courts in settling disputes between companies. This does not immediately affect US voters’ rights to control the laws through their elected representatives, but this “commission” needs to be monitored. We also need to divest the US from UN dictates that are loaded in the agreements. 

The new trade agreements with Mexico and Canada needs to be seen as an interim step.  US manufacturers are too tied to their off-shore supply chains to break these chains all at once.  The US will need to win back these jobs with higher productivity and automation before we see more auto parts manufacturing return to the Midwest.  We will also need to see better value in US auto products from GM and Ford. 

US Agenda 21, based on the global warming hoax encouraged corporations to view themselves as “global citizens” and to ignore their role in “nation-states”.  Borders were supposed to be open and national sovereignty was discouraged. The EU was pitched as a “trade partnership”, but quickly assumed control over member-states legislation.  

During the “globalist” years from 1993 to 2016, corporations moved their operations to low wage, low regulation countries. The US should have noticed that their wage costs were becoming uncompetitive during the 1970s and 1980s, but pretended that it made no difference.  

Other countries cut their corporate taxes, required manufacturing in their countries and gave bribes to companies to relocate in their countries.  We heard “design anywhere, build anywhere” from the US multi-nationals.  “Diversity” and “Globalism” were encouraged. Later “Multiculturalism” was the buzz word that started the Muslim Invasion of Europe. 

The John Birch Society is warning us about our need to restrict the “Free Trade Commission” to ensure that US sovereignty isn’t in danger. 

Stop the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement: No North American Union, by The John Birch Society, 10/8/16. 

See "New NAFTA: Text of U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) Revealed" posted October 1 at TheNewAmerican.com for an analysis of what's wrong with the Trump administration's replacement for NAFTA. 

Don't be fooled by all the talk about how it is a better economic deal for the United States. Yes, it might lead to some more jobs in the U.S. However, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) would continue the destruction of U.S. sovereignty begun by NAFTA by establishing a "Free Trade Commission" that will promote "further economic integration" between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. 

As we have learned from the example of the European Union (EU), economic integration leads to political integration. Members of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations have worked closely with European globalists over the past seven decades to deceptively build a repressive supranational government, the EU, out of a series of supposedly benign "free trade" agreements among initially independent European nations. 

Similarly, the USMCA is designed to bring about a North American Union. And, a vote on the USMCA could occur as early as the "lame-duck" session of Congress in November and December.  

Please phone your representative (202-225-3121) and senators (202-224-3121) and urge them to preserve our national sovereignty by voting no on the USMCA. Then, please email them with the same message.

A cc of each email will be automatically sent to President Trump.

Source: Email from Your Friends at The John Birch Society

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader