Four Important Bills Languishing in Congress By:
Devvy March 10, 2014 NewsWithViews.com
Amid all the meaningless
dither and political theater for TV over CPAC polls regarding the 2016
presidential election, nary a sound is heard about four very important bills
millions of Americans should be shouting to get passed. Of course, there's the
unlawfully seated U.S. Senate headed up by a certifiable lunatic, Dirty Harry
Reid, who no doubt will fight against them. Since the Oval office is empty, currently occupied by an impostor, there's no
legitimate president to sign any of them into law should they get passed.
However, we the people
should still be demanding a floor vote in the House to bring them to the
forefront of ignorant voters so they can, hopefully, begin to understand you
can't solve a problem unless you know when and how it came about.
H.R. 156: To provide for the
withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement
NAFTA (No American
Factories Taking Applications) according to Soviet traitor, CFR/Trilaterialst,
Henry Kissinger: "What Congress will have before it is not a conventional
trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system...a first
step toward a new world order." July 18, 1993
NAFTA was the first in a long line of unconstitutional
treaties/agreements destroying nearly 10
million good paying jobs; career, steady employment destroyed in furtherance of
world government. H.R.156 was introduced January 4, 2013. Bill sponsor: Rep.
Mike McIntyre [D-NC7]. To date it has ZERO cosponsors. Referred to House Ways & Means Committee where it is sitting.
H.R. 75: American Sovereignty
Restoration Act of 2013 - To end membership of the United States in the United
Nations. Bill introduced January 3, 2013. Bill Sponsor: Rep. Paul Broun
Jr. [R-GA10]. The bill has a whopping 8 cosponsors; all Republicans. Referred
to House Foreign Affairs Committee.
The United Nothing has
never kept peace anywhere in the world. The UN's purpose is to act as law
enforcement for one world government. Since 1945, we the people have been raped
in hundreds of billions of dollars in UN "dues" and related UN
expenses. "You can expect to see a one world government, Communist
controlled, under the United Nations. You will see the United Nations run up
astronomical debts which we, under the terms of the treaty, are bound to
pay." Congressional Record, House of Representatives, January 15, 1962,
pg. 215, Congressman James B. Utt - who gives the truth in his speech that day: None is So Blind as He Who Will Not See.
Every penny in UN
"dues" is borrowed money - more unpayable debt with the interest
slapped on our backs. For what? In 1971, Rep. John Rarick attempted to get us
out of that evil body; I highly encourage you read the information here. Besides Rarick's bill, you'll find an action
that might surprise many. Agenda 21 is a key tool to destroy personal property
rights and much more; See The House That Evil Built. The diabolical "sustainable
development" was birthed by the United Nothing; it must be killed once and for all.
H.R.129 - Latest Title: Return to
Prudent Banking Act of 2013. Restore Glass-Stegall - House Committee on
Financial Services. Bill introduced by Rep Kaptur, Marcy [OH-9], January 3,
2013. 79 cosponsors. 2 are Republican, the rest Democratic/Communist Party USA.
Referred to House Committee on Financial Services
Repeal of Glass-Steagall
Caused the Financial Crisis
The repeal of the law separating commercial and investment banking caused the 2008 financial crisis.
The repeal of the law separating commercial and investment banking caused the 2008 financial crisis.
"The Glass-Steagall
Act of 1933, passed during the Great Depression, prevented commercial banks
from trading securities with their clients’ deposits and created the FDIC as a
guard against bank runs. Passed in 1933 as the Banking Act, Glass-Steagall was
chipped away over the years and eventually repealed during the Clinton
Administration with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. Some experts believe
that the act's repeal contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, and the law
served as a basis for the Volcker Rule of the 2009 Dodd-Frank reform
bill."
In truth, it wasn't just
above, it is and will always be the unconstitutional "Federal"
Reserve Banking Act of 1913 - the head of the beast with all it's tentacles like the Basel Agreements. The destruction of the dollar. Inflation,
hyperinflation, deflation, booms and busts. Fiat currency - a subject not only
unknown by 200 million or so adults, but also "qualified" incumbents and/or
candidates who get elected to the
Outlaw Congress.
H.R.3894 - Senior
Citizens Tax Elimination Act to do away with income taxes on social security.
Introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), January 15, 2014. Referred to House Committee
on Ways & Means. It has a whopping 2
cosponsors.
“Seniors have already
paid tax on their Social Security contributions, so taxing Social Security is
double-taxing by the federal government,” Massie said. DeSantis echoed Massie’s
sentiments in their joint statement: “[The bill] blows the whistle on the federal
government for double-taxing the Social Security benefits of senior citizens.
Individuals already pay taxes to support Social Security, so there is no reason
why these earned benefits should be taxed on the back end.”
"The GOP
representatives argue the purpose of Social Security is “to provide people with
financial support during retirement, not to be another source of tax revenue
for the federal government.” If the bill passes, Social Security benefits would
neither be taxable nor reportable on individual tax returns, thus restoring the
integrity of the program."
Association of Mature
American Citizens (AMAC) supports the bill. I could find nothing on endorsement by the AARP, an organization
I've never belonged to and never will. They fully support the
"Federal" Reserve. I highly recommend this book, Trust Betrayed: Inside
the AARP. One reviewer hit it
right on the head: "As a former employee, all I can say is read it and
find out some of truth about this two-faced monster that rips off the old and
sells out the young." With over 40 million members, if AARP got behind
that bill, it would easily pass both houses.
Back in 2009, former
congressman Ron Paul introduced another bill that would significantly help
minimum wage earners, yet the Service Employees International Union (SEIU),
just another front for the Communist Party International, never brought it to the attention of their
2.1 million members to get it passed. The Tax Free Tips Act would have exempted tips from federal income and
payroll taxes. How many Republicans in the Outlaw Congress chant ad nauseum
they want you to keep more of what you earn? Not one of them became a cosponsor
of Rep. Paul's bill. Doesn't that tell Republicans anything? How about Pelosi
and her bunch? There wasn't a single cosponsor of that bill. Not one. Was your
congress critter in office then?
Why haven't they all
signed on the bill to stop taxing social security? The bill has been in
committee three months; what are they waiting for?
Those bills are important
issues that should have been solved a long time ago. Where has your congress
critter been? Why hasn't he/she pushed to get them passed? Do people expect change and problems solved
by reelecting the same incumbents who never got the job done in all the years
they've been in Congress? Apparently so here in Texas. Right now the
approval rating of the Outlaw Congress is 10-11%. According to at least one
poll, Americans are fed up with the lies, corruption and bull manure coming out
of the mouths of both parties:
"By a 67-26 percent
margin, voters would kick everybody on Capitol Hill to the curb and replace
them with new people. That includes two-thirds of Democrats, Republicans and
independents. The result is perhaps not so surprising, given how voters feel
about lawmakers these days: just 12 percent approve of the job Congress is
doing, while 78 percent disapprove."
But, voters said almost
the same thing in 2010 and still reelected 92% of congressional incumbents and
expected change:
"If American voters
only had the following two choices on the Congressional ballot -- keep all
current lawmakers in office, or get rid of all incumbents in Congress -- what
would they do? A new Fox News poll asked that question, and the answer could be
bad news for incumbents this fall. Sixty-eight percent of voters would oust all
incumbents, while 20 percent would keep all lawmakers in office."
Not here in Texas. Our
primary was March 4th and what did ignorant voters do? Why, they voted against
qualified challengers for Congress. They voted to reelect the same incumbents
who have destroyed this country. That's right. Conservatives ignorant on the
issues allowed themselves to be herded in the right direction by organizations
like The Conservative Republicans of Texas who sent out a sample ballot to
registered Republicans telling them to reelect every incumbent. So-called leadership leading the flock
straight to the slaughterhouse.
Not just congressional races,
but also for important offices like Lt. Governor. State Sen. Dan Patrick is as
rotten as they come, yet foolish voters gave him 41% of the vote forcing a run
off against incumbent David Dewhurst. My state rep is a dog who should register
with the Democratic/Communist Party USA, yet he allegedly beat a qualified tea
party candidate, Shannon Thomason. I say allegedly because, well, here's what I
sent out primary night to my email list: Congressional & state incumbents
sweeping primary
"I should have turned
this damn thing off, but thought I'd take a peek at the "election"
results. I want to throw up.
"Every GOP
incumbent I can see is creaming legitimate challengers. Same thing that
happened to me in 1996 even though I was only 7% behind the incumbent right up
to "election" night with all it's fraud in my race. At one minute
after the polls closed, Peter Jennings (deceased) called all 52 house seats in
California; none of the numbers changed when they quit counting votes at 4:13
am - including my race. What a remarkable feat.
"Incumbents in most
districts are so far ahead - by 40% to a challenger, it's not likely it will
turn around. Gee, isn't it strange the old 81% to 18% for an incumbent popped
up? I voted for Shannon Thomason to replace the state rep shoved down our
throats because of redistricting; he's a real dog, Rep. Darby. I know Shannon
from local community meetings. He's allegedly losing 81 to 18.
"From my Blind
Loyalty booklet of nothing but vote fraud, check these winners/losers that
night (primary March 26, 1996): 85-15, 81-18, 85-15, 81-18, 85-15, 86-14,
87-13, 81-18 and 81-14 which was my race. Those were the results for incumbents
vs challengers for the U.S. House throughout the state. Every incumbent voted
for NAFTA, all challengers including me were opposed. Wonder why we allegedly
lost?
"Those house seats
were scattered all over the state of California. Unless you're specifically
looking at a particular race, in a state the size of California or Texas,
people don't put together the pattern, but it sure as hell is there and I'm
looking at it tonight. John Kerry won the
election against George Bush in 2004 because Bush lost Ohio:
"Richard Hayes
Phillips, a former college professor, has written a new book titled, Witness to
a Crime: A Citizens' Audit of an American Election. This monstrous undertaking
covers the 2004 election results in the State of Ohio. Remember, the chief
executive for the biggest vote fraud machine operation in this country said he
would deliver Ohio to Bush. He did. What makes Phillips investigation so
compelling is the book is filled with concrete proof that the voters of Ohio
were robbed of their right to fair and impartial elections. The amount of work
that went into this investigation is staggering: 30,0000 images of forensic
evidence, then personally examining 126,000 ballots, 127 poll books and 141
voter signature books from 18 counties in Ohio. This is the definitive and
documented evidence of crimes that cannot, must not be ignored.
"One thing that
showed up in his findings was the same thing I wrote about back in 1996:
discrepancies in the numbers during the voting process - where are they? If you
click here and go to page seven of my findings, you'll see what I'm talking
about. I knew what happened: vote rigging and it was done by the machines. We
saw the same thing repeat itself during this last phony primary season. A
recount was paid for and done in the State of New Hampshire. The so-called
final audit of the numbers did not agree with the results as recorded on
primary night. Of course, the numbers continue to change for weeks after a
primary or election; I've covered this in previous columns in detail."
"What I'm seeing
tonight is a tragedy. Certainly a lot of "conservatives" would vote
for Cornyn because they simply are ignorant of everything I covered in my
recent column. But, with Americans "so angry" with Congress and with
Congress' approval rating hovering at around 10-11%, how come all the
incumbents are AGAIN sweeping the primary tonight? Hmm?
"John Conryn is an
evil SOB; he's winning above 60%; allegedly. Looking at the totals as they come in is nothing but looking at the tv on
"election" night for over a decade. Same pattern. Cream the
challengers so voters think they have no good ideas, they aren't experienced,
it's not my incumbent, it's the Democrats! I guess the voters in Texas love
having their freedom and liberties destroyed, more endless undeclared wars,
more heavy taxation to pay for the GOP's reckless and mostly unconstitutional
spending by incumbents. If this trend continues in the other primaries coming
up, I can only say "we're in serious trouble" is the understatement
of the century. How do voters in Texas think things will change by reelecting
the same people who have brought this republic to her knees?"
Texas has 32 U.S. House
seats in Congress. 18 of them had no challengers. Unbelieveable. Of ten that
did, every single incumbent won their primary. There are 4 new districts
because of redistricting; census based on counting illegal aliens in this
state. Since 18 districts had no one challenge the incumbent, the people of those districts apparently are
happy with the job their congress critter is doing: Destroying this country.
Every one of those incumbents has refused to challenge Barry Soetoro's (aka
Obama) eligibility or even the felonies he's committed, i.e., forged selective
service registration card, wire fraud, election fraud. Not to mention using a
SSN that doesn't belong to him and, of course, a forged birth certificate. That
includes popular reps like Louis Gohmert, Pete Sessions and Steve Stockman. Why haven't they signed on to the bills
above?
Low information voters
in Texas. If this trend continues in the rest of the primaries and voters do
the same thing they did in 2010 & 2012 by reelecting the same Republican
incumbents (92% & 96%) back to the U.S. House, nothing will change even if
they take the senate because those same
incumbents never go after the solution, only more Band Aids. Nothing
will change in the District of Criminals, it will only get worse while they
play politics with the Democratic /Communist Party USA and jab at the fraud in
the White House.
Voter turn out on
primary night state wide here in Texas was 9.63%. Out of over 13 million
registered voters, a pathetic 9.63% of Texans eligible to vote could find time
to get to the polls. That's how much they care for their children's future.
Don't mess with Texas is nothing but empty words.
Congressional incumbents
across the country are all out campaigning for their upcoming primaries instead
of addressing existing legislation that benefits Americans like the four bills
above. Those four bills die December 31st.
While it may seem a
waste of time, I hope you will take the time to call or fax (no email) your
U.S. House member and demand those four bills get to a floor vote. If you can,
do the same for each committee chairman for the four bills. I provided the
links, all you have to do is type up a short letter and fax it or call the district office - not the capitol in Washington
where it falls into a black hole. If each house members received tens of
thousands of snail mail letters or faxes, it will tell them what we the people
want and their primary might just be their last.
Source: NewsWithViews.com home page. © 2014 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy – email from Victoria Baer
No comments:
Post a Comment