Government Food Control

The Agenda 21 Depopulation of Rural Areas Will Give Obama Stalin-Like Control Over Food by Dave Hodges

 

The plan is called Amer­ica 2050 and the con­cept is based upon the cre­ation of megac­i­ties. In order for the megac­i­ties con­cept, which is well under­way, to come to fruition, Amer­i­can sub­urbs and rural areas must be com­pletely depop­u­lated. This process is under­way and the Obama admin­is­tra­tion is accel­er­at­ing the process.

This will come as a shock to many read­ing this arti­cle because they did not learn of these events from FOX or CNN. How­ever, in actu­al­ity, the process of mov­ing the United States towards a com­plete Agenda 21 style of total urban­iza­tion has already com­menced and it began nearly 20 years ago. In the case of total urban­iza­tion, the United States is in the process of divid­ing the coun­try into 11 large densely pop­u­lated urban cen­ters. The con­cept, which will be the sub­ject of a future inves­ti­ga­tion, will explore this “end-game” strat­egy of the glob­al­ists which will depop­u­late the America’s sub­urbs and and rural areas. The con­cept is called megac­i­ties and the frame­work was laid in 1994, when the United States became offi­cial par­tic­i­pants in the North Amer­i­can Free Trade Agree­ment (NAFTA), which was a ‘lib­er­al­ized’ trade agree­ment between Canada, the U.S. and Mex­ico. Under NAFTA, farm­ers’ income in all three coun­tries has plum­meted and mil­lions of small farm­ers have lost their land, while agribusi­ness cor­po­ra­tions (i.e. large gov­ern­ment sub­si­dized cor­po­rate farms) have reaped huge prof­its. Sub­se­quently, NAFTA has had three dra­matic effects on farm­ers in North Amer­ica and all three effects fur­ther the cause dense urban­iza­tion as out­lined in Agenda 21 documents.

NAFTA Was the Begin­ning of Rural Flight In the United States

The first notable effect of NAFTA is that it it is cred­ited with greatly accel­er­at­ing ille­gal immi­gra­tion and almost imme­di­ately bank­rupted over three mil­lion farm­ers in north­ern Mex­ico and this group became the van­guard of mil­lions of Mex­i­cans ille­gally enter­ing the US in search for sub­sis­tence work of any type.

The sec­ond dra­matic impact of NAFTA lies in the fact that it has had cat­a­strophic con­se­quences for U.S. farm­ers as a record num­ber of small farm­ers have lost their farms and have gone through fore­clo­sure while the gov­ern­ment sub­si­dized cor­po­rate farms have thrived. Since NAFTA, the aver­age annual growth of the US trade deficit has been 45% higher. Also since NAFTA took effect, about 170,000 small fam­ily farms have gone bank­rupt which rep­re­sents a decline of 21% of fam­ily farms in the U.S. The 21% of Amer­i­can small farm­ers who have been bank­rupted since the advent of NAFTA, rep­re­sents a higher per­cent­age of dis­placed Amer­i­can farm­ers than what is hap­pen­ing with the forced relo­ca­tion of Chi­nese farm­ers to the ghost cities as cov­ered in the first part of this series. And what hap­pens to Amer­i­can small farm­ers who have lost their liveli­hood? They either work on their for­mer com­peti­tors cor­po­rate farms as hired hands, or they relo­cate to urban areas in search of employment.

In a case of “death by a thou­sand cuts”, the Amer­i­can farmer is rapidly mov­ing towards extinc­tion. If it is not the EPA enforc­ing its Agenda 21 wet­lands reg­u­la­tions with dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences on farm­ers, it is the FDA harass­ing farm­ers for pur­su­ing time-honored farm related indus­tries such as the raw milk indus­try. Con­gress is plot­ting new attacks on the U.S. farmer as I write these words. Even Amish farm­ers have felt the “swat-team wrath of the fed­eral gov­ern­ment. Aver­age, every­day Amer­i­cans are being arrested for merely grow­ing their own food. The rela­tion­ship between the fed­eral gov­ern­ment and the inde­pen­dent Amer­i­can farmer has become so strained that a 17 county region in north­ern Cal­i­for­nia and south­ern Ore­gon have come together to try and form a 51st state dubbed the State of Jef­fer­son.

Whether it is China or the U.S., the United Nations Agenda 21 urban­iza­tion poli­cies are designed for the pur­pose of herd­ing peo­ple into dense urban areas for rea­sons of con­trol and the pri­mary method of con­trol has to do with dom­i­nat­ing food production.

The US Gov­ern­ment Is Gain­ing Con­trol Over All Food

Through the col­lec­tiviza­tion of the food pro­duc­tion, the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment is work­ing towards gain­ing com­plete con­trol over all food in order to con­trol the peo­ple. On an ever increas­ing basis, NAFTA is pro­vid­ing the U.S. gov­ern­ment with the exact same abil­ity. There­fore, the third dra­con­ian impact of NAFTA is that it has led to even more nefar­i­ous free trade agree­ments and exec­u­tive orders which led to the loss of con­trol for local com­mu­ni­ties over their own food supply.

Under­ly­ing the World Trade Orga­ni­za­tion, the Free Trade Area of the Amer­i­cas (FTAA which has now mor­phed into the Orga­ni­za­tion of Amer­i­can States), and the Cen­tral Amer­i­can Free Trade Agree­ment is the phi­los­o­phy that all food (i.e. from basic grains, meat, fruits and veg­eta­bles) should be exclu­sively pro­duced for inter­na­tional export. This is a dras­tic depar­ture from the time hon­ored prac­tice where each coun­try pro­duced the major­ity of food its cit­i­zens needed on local, small farms and only traded in cer­tain prod­ucts that could not be suc­cess­fully grown locally. If any­one won­ders where this is headed, we only have to look to Africa for the answer. The very first great wave of a NAFTA style of glob­al­iza­tion in agri­cul­ture took place in Africa, Asia, and Latin Amer­ica as global cor­po­ra­tions forced local farm­ers to give up local food pro­duc­tion, and shifted pro­duc­tion to plan­ta­tions using enslaved Indige­nous and African labor to grow the lux­ury crops of cof­fee, sugar, bananas, and cocoa for export to the col­o­niz­ing countries.

If the chang­ing nature of food pro­duc­tion in Africa are not enough to raise the level of con­cern for most, per­haps a quick his­tory les­son will jolt the more com­pla­cent among you into a state of full awareness.

Josef Stalin engaged in his own Soviet style Holo­caust when, in 1932 and 1933, and esti­mated six to 20 mil­lion peo­ple in the Ukraine died from star­va­tion when Stalin imple­mented his pre­scrip­tion of “hope and change” poli­cies in order to elim­i­nate the Ukrainian’s desire for becom­ing their own nation-state.

Upon assum­ing power, the Stal­in­ist Com­mu­nist regime rapidly nation­al­ized the food indus­try and forced all of the region’s farms into col­lec­tives. Thus, Stalin’s ver­sion of the Holo­caust came to fruition in what his­tory has dubbed, the “Holdo­mor,” in which mil­lions per­ished in only a two year period when the Soviet gov­ern­ment began to exter­mi­nate the Ukrain­ian pop­u­la­tion by tak­ing con­trol of food and food pro­duc­tion. The large cor­po­rate col­lec­tiviza­tion of food is pre­cisely the same thing that is presently hap­pen­ing in the United States under Obama.

The les­son here is, if the gov­ern­ment con­trols the food, the gov­ern­ment con­trols the people.

Star­va­tion Will Be Used to Enforce the Agenda 21 Depop­u­la­tion of Rural Areas

The use of food by the U.S. gov­ern­ment has been a mat­ter of offi­cial U.S. gov­ern­men­tal covert pol­icy since 1974–1975.

In Decem­ber, 1974, the National Secu­rity Coun­cil directed by Henry Kissinger com­pleted a clas­si­fied study enti­tled, “National Secu­rity Study Mem­o­ran­dum 200: Impli­ca­tions of World­wide Pop­u­la­tion Growth for U.S. Secu­rity and Over­seas Inter­ests.” The study was based upon the unproven claims that pop­u­la­tion growth in Lesser Devel­oped Coun­tries (LDC) con­sti­tuted a seri­ous risk to America’s national security.

In Novem­ber 1975, Pres­i­dent Ford, based upon the tenets of NSSM 200, out­lined a clas­si­fied plan to forcibly reduce pop­u­la­tion growth in LDC coun­tries through birth con­trol, war and famine. Ford’s new national secu­rity adviser, Brent Scow­croft, in con­junc­tion with CIA Direc­tor, George H. W. Bush, were tasked with imple­ment­ing the plan and the sec­re­taries of state, trea­sury, defense, and agri­cul­ture assisted in the imple­men­ta­tion of these insane geno­ci­dal plans. Kissinger’s quote is impor­tant because he was tasked with imple­ment­ing the insane geno­ci­dal poli­cies con­tained in NSSM 200.

NSSM 200 for­mally raised the ques­tion, “Would food be con­sid­ered an instru­ment of national power? … Is the U.S. pre­pared to accept food rationing to help peo­ple who can’t/won’t con­trol their pop­u­la­tion growth”? Kissinger has answered these ques­tions when he stated that he was pre­dict­ing a series of con­trived famines, cre­ated by manda­tory pro­grams and this would make exclu­sive reliance on birth con­trol pro­grams unnec­es­sary in this mod­ern day appli­ca­tion of eugen­ics in a scheme that would allow Henry to have his cake and eat it too in that the world would finally be rid of the “use­less eaters!”

Third world pop­u­la­tion con­trol, using food as one of the pri­mary weapons, has long been a mat­ter of offi­cial covert national pol­icy and a por­tion of Pres­i­dent Obama’s Exec­u­tive Order (EO 13603), National Defense Resources Pre­pared­ness is a con­tin­u­a­tion of that pol­icy. Only now, the intended tar­get are not the LDC’s but, instead, the Amer­i­can people.

With the stroke of his pen, Obama has total and absolute con­trol over all food where his EO 13603 states:

e) “Food resources” means all com­modi­ties and prod­ucts, (sim­ple, mixed, or com­pound), or com­ple­ments to such com­modi­ties or prod­ucts, that are capa­ble of being ingested by either human beings or ani­mals, irre­spec­tive of other uses to which such com­modi­ties or prod­ucts may be put, at all stages of pro­cess­ing from the raw com­mod­ity to the prod­ucts thereof in vendible form for human or ani­mal con­sump­tion. “Food resources” also means potable water pack­aged in com­mer­cially mar­ketable con­tain­ers, all starches, sug­ars, veg­etable and ani­mal or marine fats and oils, seed, cot­ton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such mate­r­ial after it loses its iden­tity as an agri­cul­tural com­mod­ity or agri­cul­tural prod­uct.
(f) “Food resource facil­i­ties” means plants, machin­ery, vehi­cles (includ­ing on farm), and other facil­i­ties required for the pro­duc­tion, pro­cess­ing, dis­tri­b­u­tion, and stor­age (includ­ing cold stor­age) of food resources, and for the domes­tic dis­tri­b­u­tion of farm equip­ment and fertilizer…”

NAFTA was merely the open­ing artillery bom­bard­ment against the Amer­i­can farmer and the ulti­mate depop­u­la­tion of rural areas. The death of the Amer­i­can farmer will ulti­mately come at the hands of EO 13603 and I believe this will be fully imple­mented when Obama declares mar­tial law.

Source: http://agenda21news.com/2014/08/agenda-21-depopulation-rural-areas-will-give-obama-stalin-like-control-food/#more-2543 Posted on August 27, 2014 Written by Dave Hodges, The Common Sense Show