by Dr. Sarah Condor 5/11/16
Most
of what has been written on this topic concerns the United States after the
foundation of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in 1897 by a group of Marxist
journalists and trade union activists (community organizers). In 1901 the SDP
merged with Socialist Labor Party to form the Socialist Party of America, which
gained prominence especially during the 1920s, the period of First Red Scare,
followed by the candidacy of Eugene Debs for President in 1920.
Notably,
Eugene Debs was in prison at the time of his candidacy for participating in
violent Mayday riots in Cleveland, OH, where anarchists, communists, socialists
and unionists joined to “celebrate” the Haymarket riot. The history of
socialism is the history of riots and revolutions, anarchy, unions and
community organizing. This powerful visceral force is the untamed devil dormant
in most of us. Only hard work, drill, good habits and goal-orientation can tame
it. Nonetheless, as I explain below, it has always been part of our American
Psyche. The fact that Debs had been in prison multiple times by the time he ran
for President, and was called a “traitor to his country” by President Wilson,
yet won nearly 1mil votes, clearly points at the power of socialism in America.
Where
did all this come from? Debs himself started as a unionist and member of the
Democrat Party. It was not until after the infamous Pullman strike in 1893,
while in prison, that he read Marx. On July 9, 1894, the New York Times
editorial called Debs a “lawbreaker at large, enemy to the human race.” The
Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx was not published in the United States until
1872. It had been written years earlier, in 1848, during and consequent to the
1848 revolutions throughout Europe. Marx was in Brussels, penniless, ranting
against greedy capitalists…
However,
prior to the 1870s, socialism in America had been different and unlike its
European counterpart. Socialism existed here before Marx in the form of utopian
socialist communities such as New Harmony, founded in Indiana by Robert Owen.
The fact that Owen was a Welsh immigrant with several trades (saddler, iron
monger, draper, eventually a mill owner in Scotland) indicates that his concept
of “socialism” was that of a community engaging in work and trade. He would not
have seen any difference between a “socialist” and a small businessman.
Owen
was also very inventive and came up with a “truck system” of payment, wherein
the company issued “tokens” and the workers could purchase goods for tokens in
a company store. This system was soon abolished by the Token Acts, but it
remained dormant elsewhere and would be practiced later, on a much larger
scale, by the Soviet communists in the countries they would subjugate, such as
Romania, where one could purchase goods only for such tokens (unless you had
some West German Marks and access to the black market…).
Interestingly,
Owen was supported (both ideologically and financially) by Jeremy Bentham, the
founder of Utilitarianism, the doctrine whose concise motto is that “the
greatest happiness to the greatest number should be the measure of right or
wrong.” What is more, Bentham’s Fragment
on Government coincides with our Declaration
of Independence, wherein Jefferson famously changed Locke’s “life,
liberty, and the pursuit of property” to the “pursuit of happiness.” Jefferson
also resourced George Mason’s Virginia Declaration of Rights, which restated
Locke as “…life, liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property,
and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.”
Both
Mason and Jefferson mention happiness, but Jefferson omitted entirely the idea
that it is based on the pursuit of personal property. Happiness as such is an
abstract idea which can be interpreted in as many ways as there are human
beings on Earth. To unify this definition, communists (so called “democratic
socialists”) build on Bentham’s utilitarianism, while capitalists (republicans)
tend toward pragmatism. Practically speaking, as Bentham is largely considered
the founder of modern welfare state, we may conclude that the founding stone of
socialism had been laid by Jefferson in our key founding document.
Nonetheless,
how it would be interpreted was unclear. Owen’s “utopian socialism” was largely
understood as small community utilitarianism. It was fully compatible with
Emerson’s and Thoreau’s Transcendentalism, which stemmed from the
reconciliation of Locke’s empiricism with Christianity, in particular in view
of the popularity of (and in opposition to) Hume’s skepticism (which claimed
that God is unknowable and His existence cannot be proved). Thus, two “types”
of socialism were extant at this time, and ever since, in the United States:
the Fourier-like anti-trade communitarianism (soon to be transformed into
communism), and what we might refer to as the Transcendental “universalism.”.
The latter was closely tied to British romanticism: the tendency to become one
with Nature, God, Universal Being – so skillfully portrayed in Whitman’s Leaves
of Grass and Emerson’s Essays.
The
fact that Transcendental universalism has always been predominant in the United
States leads us to conclude that Jefferson’s “pursuit of happiness” should
properly be interpreted not as a socialist aspiration with communist ends but,
rather, as a statement of romanticism grounded in our American admiration for
Nature, the raw wilderness which sustained us from the very start and in which
we were bound to live and survive. As it was impossible to survive without
trade, killing, sustenance of culture upon the produce of the land… we discover
there is a direct link between Jeffersonian democracy, Emerson’s
Transcendentalism, and universalist pragmatism of the Metaphysical Club. Trade
and personal achievement have always been key to our survival and our
happiness. What is more, our religious tolerance is extremely akin to Buddhist
and Hinduist doctrines of nirvana and pacifism. Non-interventionism and
isolationism are thus typical capitalist values: mind your business and let
everyone else mind theirs!
On
the other hand, revolution and anarchy is the product of communism, which
fosters big government and welfare state. Reliance on government and welfare
state were furthered by the likes of Debs who transformed Owen’s utopian
socialism into uncompromising Marxist hell. As indicated above, Owen’s
philosophy stems from Bentham’s utilitarianism and is closely tied to Hume’s
skepticism. This means that socialist understanding of the “pursuit of
happiness” is directly opposed to and antithetical to the “pursuit of
happiness” in the vein of Jefferson, Emerson, Peirce, Holmes and William James.
It is anti-Christian and anti-individualistic. It hates every Donald Trump and
Steve Jobs. It admires big, totalitarian do-gooders, wolves in sheep clothing
whose mottoes are: there is safety in numbers; proletariat unite; forget about
the individual – think about the mass! This type of socialism is skeptical,
communitarian and revolutionary. It understands well the strict, Sharia-Muslim
organized tyranny, because it is one.
In
conclusion, the American transcendental “socialist” philosophy starts in 1800
with Jefferson’s extolling the soil and culminates in 1900 with William James’
“functional psychology.” The Marxist line of socialist communism in America
starts with Robert Owen and culminates with Eugene Debs. The twentieth century
socialism from the First Red Scare to the Second Red Scare to Alinsky, Clinton
and Sanders must be viewed as a restless dweller in our republic’s cellar. From
time to time, the old, disheveled ghost will emerge to point at the “evil Wall
Street” crying wolf. This idling Socialist will inevitably climb upstairs to
denigrate all our fundamental values: industriousness, self-reliance,
independence, personal and national pride. He will preach political correctness
– attacking our language, our faith, our culture of pragmatism and personal
property. Socialists’ most powerful vehicle is ENVY. Envy is moral because it
is justified by fairness. Violence is moral on the same grounds… Are we going
to need new Espionage and Sedition Acts to deal with these anarchists?
Finally,
it must be emphasized that transparent democracy means republican system of
accountability. It is good for us to see who they are and what they want. Let
us help them out of the cellar. Let us lead them to the light of day. Let us
show them the mirror of their likeness. They (Sanders and his sheep) have grown
up in the best country in the world, benefitted from all the advantages of
capitalism – only to turn into shiftless monsters of socialism!
It
was under F.D.R. that socialists were Prompted to join Democrats. Prominent
Democrats, such as David Dubinsky, called upon Socialists to vote Democrat in
1936 – and have done so ever since. Socialists’ ranks shrunk, until they fell
below 2,000 during the McCarthy Era. Socialists crawled into capitalist cellars
again, awaiting the opportunity, which came with the Civil Rights Movement.
They hijacked the cause and lulled the black people. It is easy to appeal to
the primeval instincts in us all: envy and propensity to violence. Finally,
1968, the Socialist Party of America came up with a presidential candidate –
Hubert Humphrey. Four years later, in 1972, it was George McGovern. In those
years, while Donald Trump was building and renovating housing complexes in New
York and Ohio, Sanders and Clinton joined the New Left and began their careers
of community organizing. Eugene Debs and Karl Marx would be proud of them.
http://politichicks.com/2016/05/socialism-in-america/
No comments:
Post a Comment