By Tad Cronn June 24, 2016
Earlier this month, President
Obama was bragging
about globalization being here to stay, and telling American workers that they
aren’t getting their jobs back (probably the closest thing to an honest
statement on the economy ever to come out of his mouth).
I’ve said before he should know better than
to endorse anything, because in the week and a half since his
statement sounded the trumpets for that still-forming New
World Order/One World Government,
the forces of globalization have taken a one-two punch to their plans. It’s not
fatal, but it’s gratifying.
During a June 13 interview with Bloomberg Businessweek,
Obama warned free trade critics that they can’t stand in the way of change.
“I think that the temptation in that circumstance is to
resort to nativism and nostalgia and the sense that these are things that are
now out of control and ‘I want to take control back,’” he said.
He seemed to be aiming his message particularly at older
generations of workers, because he praised younger workers (the few there are)
for not being anti-trade or anti-globalization.
“If you look at surveys, it tends to be older workers who
are feeling displaced who are attracted to this notion of ‘let’s pull up the
drawbridge and shut everybody off,'” he said, in a not-so-veiled jab at Donald
Trump’s supporters.
Part of that globalization strategy, however, has been to
weaken or erase borders and weaken nations’ sovereignty, both here and around
the world. And it’s undeniable that the NWO types have had the upper hand in
recent years.
But this week, the Supreme Court and the voters of Britain
put two big dents in the NWO juggernaut. First, the Supreme Court failed
to overturn a lower
court ruling that blocked Obama’s executive amnesty for millions of illegal
aliens.
Obama took that one personally because he had used an
executive order to unconstitutionally enact his personal will after he failed
to persuade Congress to rubber stamp his plans. Since then, he has greatly
expanded his abuse of executive orders, effectively acting as a king rather
than a president, and ignoring the Constitution, while essentially throwing
open the border, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. It’s precisely
those actions on the part of Obama that have provided such powerful fuel for
the rise of Donald Trump.
The lower court whose ruling was upheld had called Obama on
his self-crowning achievement, reminding him that there is such a thing as the
separation of powers, and he has broken that constitutional law. The New
Orleans court had ruled in the case of 26 states that sued the federal
government, that Obama lacked the authority to shield millions of immigrants
from deportation and grant them work permits without the approval of Congress.
Obama blasted the 4-4 tie in the Supreme Court, and the
media have picked up on complaints about the “roadblock” that “takes us further
from the country we aspire to be.” The country Obama aspires for us to be, of
course, is one without borders, without a world-leading economy and without
national sovereignty.
Speaking of national sovereignty, a bare majority
of Brits voted just yesterday
to take theirs back from the European Union, that ghastly tool of globalization
that has brought the European economy to its knees and is threatening to erase
European countries’ historical identities by inviting in unchecked hordes of
Muslim “refugees” who have brought with them crime, social upheaval, disdain
for Western values and the anxious swords of jihad.
The people of Britain, by the thinnest of margins, have now
opted out, resulting in the resignation of the prime minister, and encouraging
the plans of conservatives in other European countries to formulate their own
efforts to regain their freedom.
Trump, speaking in Scotland, suggested that Obama’s recent
encouraging of the British people to stay in the EU swung the vote toward
freedom. “People want to take their country back. They want to have
independence. … They want to take their borders back. … They want to have a
country again,” Trump said. Because in the end, to paraphrase, there are only
two kinds of societies — the free kind and the other kind. The people of the
world have had enough of the other kind.
No comments:
Post a Comment