A
practice that needs to end.
The
recent admission by the Obama administration that it had sent pallets of Swiss
Francs and Euros in the value of $400 million to Iran aboard an unmarked cargo
plane in January has sent shockwaves through the country.
Political
commentators on both sides have labeled the money a ransom payment given in
return for the release of four American hostages being held by the country.
The four
“detainees” — journalist Jason Rezaian, U.S. Marine Amir Hekmati, carpet
designer Nosratollah Khosravi and pastor Saeed Abedini — have said they’re in
good shape, but Abedini reported that the departure of their plane from
Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport was held up while authorities there waited for
another jet to arrive. It’s now known that the jet in question was the unmarked
cargo plane carrying the aforementioned money.
This
appears to be a smoking gun that confirms that the cash was not merely a
reparation payment to the regime by the American government (as has been
claimed by President Obama) but was, in fact, a quid pro quo outlay for the
four men.
The fact
that the money was in Swiss Francs and Euros is evidence that the American
government wanted to skirt around laws which say that such payments to nations
in U.S. dollars are illegal.
Some GOP
Congressmen such as GOP Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas have accused Democratic
presidential candidate Hillary Clinton of helping to arrange for the payment
during her tenure as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.
Even
President Obama’s own spokesman has acknowledged that some of the money is
likely to wind up funding terrorism, which Iran is the world’s worst sponsor
of, according to the U.S. State Department.
As
questionable as the payment was, it almost unbelievably is not the first time
the U.S. has flown pallets of cash to foreign countries in times of crisis or
war. Between 2003 and 2004 during the Iraq War, the administration of George W.
Bush controversially flew planeloads’ worth of mostly U.S. $100 bills to
Baghdad from New York totaling $12 billion, dwarfing the recent Iranian
payment. The total weight of the 281 million bills sent was 363 tons.
The C-130
cargo transport planes departed once or twice each month for Iraq with as much
as $2.4 billion aboard each trip. Fortunately, none of the transports were shot
down or developed engine trouble. Ostensibly, the money was meant for
disbursement to U.S. contractors and Iraqi ministries, but as frequently
happens with cash, full accounting for the money was lax at best. Former
California Congressman Henry Waxman, the chairman of the House Committee on
Government Oversight and Reform, fiercely criticized the move at the time,
stating, “The numbers are so large that it doesn’t seem possible that they’re
true.
Who in
their right mind would send 363 tons of cash into a war zone?” Waxman’s
committee recorded the situation. “One [American-led] Coalition Provisional
Authority official described an environment awash in $100 bills,” a committee
memo states. “One contractor received a $2m payment in a duffel bag stuffed with
shrink-wrapped bundles of currency. Auditors discovered that the key to a vault
was kept in an unsecured backpack. They also found that $774,300 in cash had
been stolen from one division’s vault. Cash payments were made from the back of
a pickup truck, and cash was stored in unguarded sacks in Iraqi ministry
offices.
One
official was given $6.75m in cash and was ordered to spend it in one week
before the interim Iraqi government took control of Iraqi funds… Many of the
funds appear to have been lost to corruption and waste … thousands of ‘ghost
employees’ were receiving pay checks from Iraqi ministries under the CPA’s
control. Some of the funds could have enriched both criminals and insurgents
fighting the United States.” In at least one case, a single amount of $500
million was labeled ‘TBD,’ meaning its use was “to be determined.”
According
to the special inspector general for Iraq’s reconstruction, Stuart Bowen, Jr.,
$8.8 billion of the money was given to Iraqi ministries “without assurance the
monies were properly used or accounted for.” In fact, Bowen believes that the
general lack of accounting extended to the entire $20 billion spent by the U.S.
on Iraqi reconstruction. Oversight for the cash was supposed to have been done
by a certified public accounting company, but according to Bowen instead was
performed by “an obscure consulting firm called North Star Consultants Inc. The
firm was so small that it reportedly operates out of a private home in San
Diego.” The firm “did not perform a review of internal controls as required by
the contract,” admitted Bowen.
The
financial advisor for the American reconstruction effort, retired U.S. Navy
Admiral David Oliver, was interviewed as saying he didn’t know what happened to
the $8.8 billion. “I have no idea. I can’t tell you whether or not the money
went to the right things or didn’t.” A follow-up by Bowen turned up between
$1.2 billion and $1.6 billion in a bunker in rural Lebanon in 2010.
Much of
the money has since disappeared. “I don’t know how the money got to Lebanon,”
he said. “If I knew that, we would have made more progress on [accounting for
it].” The leader of the reconstruction effort, U.S. Presidential Envoy L. Paul
Bremer, has said, “I acknowledge that I made mistakes and that with the benefit
of hindsight, I would have made some decisions differently. Our top priority
was to get the economy moving again. The first step was to get money into the
hands of the Iraqi people as quickly as possible. It was not a perfect
solution. Delay might well have exacerbated the nascent insurgency and thereby
increased the danger to Americans.”
Bremer
left Iraq in the hands of the Iraqi Interim Government on June 28, 2004. The
full story of the cash may never be known, but when the U.S. government starts
distributing money in the form of crisp new bills loaded on airplanes, one can
be sure that the uses for such funds will likely be less than legitimate.
~American Liberty Report
http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/sending-pallets-of-cash-abroad/
Comments
These
practices need to be ended along with leaving US military equipment in these
countries. The use of contractors should
be eliminated completely. Food
distribution should be made by the US military only.
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment