World’s most vulnerable: are we responsible for
them all? by Ann Corcoran on October 13, 2016
This story at
the
Huffington Post bashing Trump and telling us we must not turn our backs on the “world’s most
vulnerable” is not worth reading. The refugee propagandists’ favorite
word!
I simply want
to make the point that about every five years the world’s most vulnerable changes and we are expected to
“welcome” them all to our towns after hearing the same old propaganda
guilt-trip stories like this one.
Not too long
ago it was the Burmese who were most vulnerable (we have taken in around
200,000). And, I remember so well when the Iraqis were the world’s most
vulnerable (oh they love that word!) because it was about the same time
I began writing RRW. Our Iraqi refugee numbers are climbing toward 200,000.
Then a few
years ago it became the Syrian most vulnerables. And, get ready because
we are hearing rumbles that they are gearing up to guilt-trip us about the
South Sudanese! Blah, blah, blah! It never ends!
This
HuffPo article concludes with an appeal to send money to the International Rescue Committee which
as one of the leading members of the refugee industry receives hundreds of
thousands of dollars from the US taxpayer each year—but it is never enough
money!
DOS Syrian
resettlement pace would bring total in 2017 to over 20,000, by Ann
Corcoran on October 13, 2016
When the Obama Department of State
(DOS) ‘consulted’ with the US Senate on the number of refugees to be admitted
in fiscal year 2017 (which began 2 weeks ago on October 1) they were very cagey
about how many Syrians would be in the flow.
However, a refugee contractor in
California let the cat out of the bag, here, a few
weeks ago saying that he suspected it would be 20,000-30,000 Syrians in a
total refugee flow of 110,000.
To all the
Republican traitors, by not supporting Donald Trump you are going to let this
man virtually run the country. John Podesta has long been an advocate for
opening our borders and flooding America with refugees. See our Podesta archive
here where our earliest post is in 2009: https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/?s=Podesta
Frankly what we get will depend on one
thing—whether Donald Trump wins the White House or whether Hillary Clinton (and
Bill, with John Podesta as chief of staff) are in the Oval Office.
An aside: As you learn more about the people Hillary has surrounded
herself with in the campaign via the Wikileaks e-mail dumps, remember THESE
VERY SAME PEOPLE WILL BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE RUNNING THE COUNTRY IF SHE WINS!
Now back to the Syrians (98-99% are
Muslims, we are not saving the Christians).
Don’t forget that when Senator Jeff
Sessions held his hearing about this year’s plan, he and Senator Cruz got an
admission out of the Dept.of Homeland Security that some Syrians
(because many don’t have documents and data) have been admitted based on their personal stories!
From Michael Patrick Leahy at Breitbart: The Obama
administration is on pace to bring 20,000 Syrian refugees into the United
States in FY 2017.
The final number of Syrian refugees
arriving in the United States this fiscal year will be determined by which
candidate–Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump–is inaugurated as president in
January 2017.
If Hillary Clinton wins, she will be
well positioned to accelerate Syrian refugee resettlement in FY 2017 to the
65,000 she has said she wants to come into the country annually.
If Donald Trump wins, he has committed to suspending Syrian refugee
resettlement.
A recent Breitbart/Gravis poll shows that 59 percent of voters oppose
Hillary Clinton’s plan to increase Syrian refugee resettlement in the United
States. Continue
here. See the map!
I was doing a little numbers research
last night myself and got a slightly larger number of Syrians than did Leahy,
but I suspect more data was loaded between the time Leahy did his research and
I did mine. Below is a map from the Refugee
Processing Center (DOS data storage website) where you can see the number
of Syrians who arrived in your state since October 1. The total
was 686 (as of last evening) which means, at this pace, they could easily reach
5,000 by Inauguration Day in January.
Top receiving states are Michigan, California, Texas, Arizona and
Maryland (ahhhh!). Maryland is never in the top for resettlement
states, so what is up with this? Most of the 52 that went to Maryland over the
last 12 days were placed in Baltimore with a handful in Silver Spring and 2 in
Riverdale.
Clear path in Maryland as governor has been silent.
I am guessing the new enthusiasm for
Maryland is that the mayor of Baltimore has been merrily inviting Muslims to
live in that hellhole (powder keg!) and Maryland’s Republican Governor made some squawks
when other Republican governors said they didn’t want Syrians, but since then
he has not said a word (thus quietly supporting the refugee resettlement
program).
Map from the DOS Refugee Processing
Center as of last evening, October 12, 2016. 686 Syrians admitted in first 12
days of Fiscal year 2017.
Is Watertown, NY
next on the list of towns to be seeded with third worlders? by Ann Corcoran on October 13,
2016People ask me all the time: How do I find out if my town
is targeted? Frankly there is no list put out by the federal government and its paid
resettlement contractors. They are very secretive about the selection process.
We heard recently that there are 47 new sites and we have only so far identified
those listed below.
Watch out
Watertown—you will be next! But, this article from Watertown, NY is a prime
example of how you get a hint that something is up!
Usually a local newspaper writes a
puffy piece like this one about how great it would be for Watertown to revitalize
neighborhoods by bringing in impoverished people from mostly the Middle East
and Africa. (You can tell by the comments that many local folks are having none
of it.)
Honestly I am getting weary of
repeating things over and over again. So I recommend that you see our archive
on Utica (by clicking
here) and learn about all the problems it has had over the
last many years. And, then see our ‘Ten Things you need to know if welcoming
refugees to your town’ here.
This
story from the Watertown Daily Times pretty well
lays out how your town becomes a resettlement site (do-gooder works with
elected official and then they bring in the supposed ‘religious’ charities, and
federal resettlement contractor who all work together, secretively, to get the
approval of the US Dept. of State). If you don’t want this in Watertown, folks
there need to get organized against it ASAP!
WATERTOWN — West
Division Street resident Douglas J. Anderson wanted to do something about the
city’s blighted neighborhoods, abandoned homes and so-called “zombie
properties.”
During a recent visit to Utica, he
came across the good work that the Mohawk Valley Resource Center for Refugees
[subcontractor of Lutheran
Immigration and Refugee Service, here—ed] was
doing, he said, after helping to organize a presentation at Tuesday’s City
Council meeting.
Shelly Calllahan
of the Mohawk Valley Resource Center for Refugees in Utica says everything is
hunky-dory there! NOT!
Mr. Anderson told Councilwoman Teresa R. Macaluso about the center. She agreed
to visit the center in June and was impressed with what she saw. If it could
happen in Utica, why not here, she thought.
The city would not be involved in establishing the center, she said,
adding it would take religious organizations and non-profit organizations to
get it off the ground. It also would take community and business leaders to
join the efforts, Ms. Callahan said.
A handful of clergy and community
leaders who attended the meeting mostly listened to information about the
federally funded program. [No!
it is not completely funded by the feds, this will cost local taxpayers a
bundle, especially in the school system budget—ed]
With the threat of terrorism in the
world today, Brownville resident Bruce E. Bennett expressed concerns about
young men from other countries living here. “I see a lot of potential problems,”
he said afterward. “Look what has happened in Europe.”
But Councilwoman Macaluso believes that Watertown is a welcoming
community, noting that it has accepted people from all over the
country to come here and serve at Fort Drum. More
here.
These are new or expanding
resettlement sites (in addition to those listed
here):
Asheville, NC
Rutland, VT
Reno, NV
Ithaca, NY
Missoula, MT
Aberdeen, SD
Charleston, WV
Fayetteville, AR
Blacksburg, VA
Pittsfield, MA
Northhampton, MA
Flint, MI
Bloomington, IN
Traverse City, MI
https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2016/10/13/is-watertown-ny-next-on-the-list-of-towns-to-be-seeded-with-third-worlders/
No comments:
Post a Comment