A new federal grant program requires a college degree before
you¹re qualified¹ to take care of toddlers. by KATHARINE B. STEVENS Dec. 21, 2014 6:53 p.m. ET
At the White House¹s early-childhood-education summit on
Dec. 10, President Obama highlighted two new federal competitive-grants
programs: the Early Head Start-Child Care Partnerships, aimed to increase the
availability of
high-quality infant and toddler care, and the Preschool
Development Grants, which are meant to expand preschool programs in
disadvantaged communities. Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews
Burwell and Education
Secretary Arne Duncan
<http://topics.wsj.com/person/D/Arne-Duncan/1135>
announced the winners: 18 states along with more than 200 school
districts, agencies, programs and nonprofits will receive about $750 million in
federal funding. Before accepting the money, though, winners would be wise to
read the fine print. While these grants represent an admirable effort to ensure
the well-being of America¹s most vulnerable young children, they¹re also a Trojan
horse bearing counterproductive requirements such as mandating
college degrees for all preschool teachers, and a mountain
of federal regulations.
The first program, Early Head Start-Child Care Partnerships,
is administered by HHS and provides $500 million to increase infant and toddler
care for working parents, especially in poor communities. The 234 winners get
money
to expand the scope of federally funded Early Head Start
programs by partnering with local child-care centers ³who agree to meet high
standards of quality.² While ³high standards of quality² seem like a great
idea, the devil is in
the details. Child-care providers who receive the new
funding will be subject to federal monitoring and required to comply with the
2,400 Head Start ³Performance Standards² stipulating everything from staff qualifications
to cot placement to how to clean potties. This new program also contradicts the
spirit of the reauthorized bipartisan
Child Care and Development Block Grant Act that President
Obama signed last month, which explicitly gives states the responsibility for
defining and improving the quality of local child care. The grants amount to an
end-run around the states by enabling the federal government to enforce
burdensome standards at the local level.
The second program, the Preschool Development Grants
competition jointly administered by the Departments of Education and HHS aims
to help states develop and expand preschool for low- and moderate-income
4-year-olds. The
program awarded $250 million to 18 states to implement
preschool plans that meet the federally defined conditions of ³High Quality
Preschool.² The Preschool Development Grants also require states to define
³high quality² by compliance with input standards, like staff qualifications
and
class size, rather than by good outcomes such as improved
knowledge and skills.
The requirement that all preschool teachers have bachelor¹s
degrees (in any field) to ensure ³a qualified workforce² in early childhood
education is particularly detrimental. Young children don¹t need a qualified
workforce. They need an effective workforce. There¹s no evidence that
bachelor¹s
degrees make preschool teachers more effective.
New research, such as the work of professors Robert Pianta
and Bridget Hamre at the University of Virginia¹s Center for Advanced Research
on Teaching and Learning, clearly shows that what counts isn¹t what degrees
teachers have
but how they teach. That¹s especially critical in early
childhood when interactions between teachers and students, not content
knowledge, is what drives success. Focusing on bachelor¹s degrees is an easy
way bureaucrats can claim to be raising teacher quality without actually doing
it.
Based on College Board data for the average price of
four-year degrees, it would cost at least $23 billion for the 300,000 current
preschool teachers who don¹t have college degrees to get them. Great teachers
will be forced to go into debt to pay for a college degree they don¹t need just
to keep their jobs. Others will be forced out of teaching because they can¹t
afford to spend four more years in school. The cost of college will prevent
many potentially wonderful teachers from entering the profession.
Teacher quality and pay should be defined by effectiveness
in the classroom, not credentials. College doesn¹t provide the essential skills
needed to teach young children. Those skills are best learned through
specialized training combined with on-the-job practice under the supervision of
an
expert teacher.
As a recent study by Mathematica Policy Research showed,
apprenticeship-based training models open to bright,
hardworking high-school graduates hold promise as an effective and less
expensive approach and will expand, rather than limit, the pool of potential
high-quality teachers for early learners. In the U.K. prospective teachers are
carefully screened and required to pass skills tests in both numeracy and
literacy to qualify for teaching apprenticeships.
Research shows that good preschool, like good child care,
can be critical to young children¹s development and is insufficiently
accessible to poor and working-class families. But these new federal grants are
paying states to
institutionalize a misguided conception of quality, repeating
the same mistakes that the education establishment has been making in K-12 for decades:
focusing on teacher credentials rather than effectiveness, holding programs
accountable for compliance rather than outcomes, and advocating centralized
control rather than innovation.
Support for early education is growing and presents an
opportunity to build new systems right, from the ground up. Once bureaucrats
start down the road of overregulating the wrong things, though, it¹s going to
be very hard to turn back.
Ms. Stevens is a research fellow in education policy studies
at the American Enterprise Institute, specializing in early childhood
education.
Source:http://www.wsj.com/articles/katharine-stevens-here-come-the-child-care-cops-1419205984?mod=WSJ_ hps _sections_opinion
No comments:
Post a Comment