Most rational
observers should agree that in order to create jobs and boost wages, the
economy must grow.
That is
certainly true. However, because government spending is included as a part of
the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis,
it is difficult to gauge how well the private sector is actually doing based on
the reported headline number, because one cannot be certain how much government
spending is biasing the GDP measure.
And for that
matter, what impact the private sector has on job creation and income levels
versus that of government spending.
With that in
mind, Americans for Limited Government has separated
the data compiled by the Bureau of Economic Analysis and compared its performance with the growth of jobs in the
Bureau of Labor Statistics’ monthly household survey, and household median
income measured by the U.S. Census Bureau.
What emerges is
a very strong correlation between inflation-adjusted private sector GDP and the
growth of jobs, and much less so for government spending at the federal state
and local level.
That is not to
say government spending is wholly irrelevant to the jobs question, but since
only 14.9 percent of those with jobs work for the government at all levels — or
21.9 million — it is easy to see why its impact might be limited.
Whereas, job
creation as a whole is joined at the hip with economic growth. When the private
sector expands, since over 85 percent of us work there, we all benefit and jobs
are created.
When government
grows, on the other hand, comparatively fewer people tend to benefit.
A similar story
emerges on the question of income, where nominal private sector growth appears
to show a direct causal link to higher incomes.
Whereas,
government spending at the federal, state and local level does not appear to
drive wages at all. If anything, it’s the other way around, with spending
fluctuations lagging behind wage growth. Higher incomes, resulting in higher
tax revenues, seem to have more of an impact on increasing government spending
— particularly at the state and local level — than the inverse.
All of which means for those interested in creating jobs and growing wages in the New Year, and with the new Congress, should be primarily focused on the task of growing the private sector — not government.
All of which means for those interested in creating jobs and growing wages in the New Year, and with the new Congress, should be primarily focused on the task of growing the private sector — not government.
Robert Romano
is the senior editor of Americans for Limited Government.
Source:http://netrightdaily.com/2014/12/growth-matters-jobs-wages/
No comments:
Post a Comment