Last week, the
Federal Communication Commission’s “Open Internet Order” went into effect,
assigning new rules to Internet Service Providers’ operations. Don’t be fooled
by the seemingly benign title, the regulation’s suggested positive benefits on
the open and free operation of the Internet will be outweighed by a reduction
in private employment and economic opportunity, including an especially
deleterious consequence for Hispanic and African-American economic
opportunities, at a time when future growth is an increasing concern.
As Hispanics, and especially Latinos,
have become the most active igniters of startup ventures recently, the
implication is one that runs contrary to the goals of many regulators and
legislators who were originally in favor of “Open Internet” regulation.- Justin
Vélez-Hagan
Designed to
keep the power of larger Internet providers in check, the FCC’s rules were
enacted based on the belief that a few telecom companies had undue power over
its consumers and other businesses offering content. Although few complaints
were filed regarding these concerns, regulators acted quickly, seemingly
discounting the potential harm to businesses (both large and small) and
employment across the tech industry.
The FCC itself
pointed out the unequal impact on small businesses, noting that 20,000 will be
directly affected by the new rules (not including the millions more that we all
know will be harmed). Recent testimony noted how some of these businesses are
already pulling back on their investments – one local St. Louis Internet
provider has chosen to delay plans to triple its infrastructure, for example –
because they just don’t know whether the regulations will be upheld by the
courts, nor do many understand how business costs will change.
Before the new
regulations even took effect, companies around the country noted how they had
to hire attorneys specializing in telecommunications just to understand the
additional compliance costs and how business operations may need to evolve.
Those who choose not to employ specialty legal services, risk heavy fines for
non-compliance from the newly empowered FCC who is already flexing its muscles
on companies that have fallen out of its good graces (just ask AT&T, who
was recently fined $100 million).
Some economists
estimate job losses to be in the tens of thousands from investment reductions
alone. Based on the implementation of similar, previously enacted regulations,
industry firms will likely draw back capital expenditures to the tune of $4-10
billion per year, leading to systematic hiring freezes or an increase in
layoffs.
What does this
mean to Hispanic and African-American economics? The sector that will be hurt
the most is the one that also has the greatest potential for non-Asian
minorities, according to a new study. Although many hold the common
misperception that tech jobs don’t offer the same opportunities for Hispanics
and African-Americans as for whites and Asians, the reality is that tech sector
job growth has created an incomparable opportunity for these minorities in
recent years. In fact, between 2009 and 2014, the tech industry was responsible
for 80,000 new jobs for college-educated African-Americans and even more for
Hispanics. What is so impressive about these numbers is that they are nearly on
par with the booming healthcare industry, have increased at a faster rate, and
are expected to easily surpass healthcare new hires, if they haven't
already.
Despite the
stereotype suggesting the opposite, tech offers a tremendous opportunity for
Hispanics and African-Americans, which regulators have failed to take into
consideration.
For the two
demographic groups with the highest unemployment (Hispanic unemployment is 40
percent higher than the national unemployment rate, while African-American
rates are double), policies that promote growth in the industries that provide
the most benefit to these groups should be a high priority for legislators and
regulators. However, some regulators are more concerned about politics than
they are economics, using their power to inflict pain upon those who disagree
with their agenda, and have failed to consider the disparate impact on those
who need as much help as they can get.
In addition to
employment concerns, additional compliance costs and bureaucratic hurdles make
it easier for larger firms to enter and compete in the industry, shifting the
competitive advantage away from entrepreneurial firms, which account for the
greatest percentage of new jobs over the last 15 years. Since the Great
Recession, there has been a market consolidation in favor of larger firms with
the resources to weather major contractions, while new regulations in this
industry will only accelerate this snowballing advantage. As Hispanics, and
especially Latinas, have become the most active igniters of startup ventures
recently, the implication is one that runs contrary to the goals of many
regulators and legislators who were originally in favor of “Open Internet”
regulation.
Aside from a
miraculous, immediate end to the expected years of litigation and eventual
defeat of the FCC’s new regulations, there is a more appropriate, permanent
route that D.C. can take. Momentum has already developed for bipartisan legislation
to address the concerns I’ve mentioned, but to date, no one in Congress has
capitalized on the growing apprehensions of legislators from both sides of the
aisle.
If Congress
doesn’t act, the withdrawal in investment, market consolidation, and compliance
and litigation costs will only end in a net negative for our long-term economy,
one that is especially damaging to minority groups already suffering more than
the rest of the country.
Justin Vélez-Hagan is the
founder of The National Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce and an
economic policy researcher at the University of Maryland. He is also the
author of the upcoming book entitled Nousonomics: The common sense behind basic
economics. He can be reached at JustinV@NPRChamber.org or
@JVelezHagan.
Posted on: New Georgia Republican Leadership
by Melanie Villafane
No comments:
Post a Comment