The
Supreme Court is bending back the overreach in US anti-discrimination laws. The
Gay Wedding Cake case is about the tyranny of the minority. Liberals have
weaponized anti-discrimination laws to impose their ideological “values”.
Anti-discrimination
executive orders after 1945 addressed the issue that “all men are created
equal”. The federal government took action to integrate. The US population had
settled in racially homogeneous groups to protect their property values. The
creation of the suburbs resulted in “white flight” from the cities.
In 1948,
the US Military was desegregated. The civil rights movement began in 1954 with
the desegregation of schools. Public transit was desegregated in 1956.
Government contractors were required to take “affirmative action” to hire
Blacks in 1961. All of these changes were made through Executive Orders.
The Civil
Rights Act of 1964 said that Blacks and Women could apply for all private
sector jobs in the US. It was passed by Congress and followed by the
Anti-Discrimination Act 1967.
Most
private sector employers continued to advertise job openings and hire new
employees using the same screening methods they had always used to predict
success on the job. But the cost of dealing with anti-discrimination law was
high.
There has
been a pile-on of protected groups. See Wikipedia post below:
U.S. federal law protects
individuals from discrimination or harassment based on sex, race, age,
disability, color, creed, national origin or religion. Many state laws also
give certain protected groups special protection against harassment and
discrimination, as do many employer policies. Although it is not required by
federal law, employer policies may also protect employees from harassment or
discrimination based on marital status or sexual orientation.[1] The following characteristics are "protected" by
United States federal anti-discrimination law:
·
Age (40
and over) – Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967
·
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission interprets 'sex' to
include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity
·
Familial status – Civil
Rights Act of 1968 Title VIII: Housing cannot discriminate for having
children, with an exception for senior housing
·
Veteran status
– Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment
Assistance Act of 1974 and Uniformed Services Employment and
Reemployment Rights Act
Individual states can and
do create other classes for protection under state law.
Comments
If
we added white males under age 40 to the list of protected groups, then
everybody could sue everybody.
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment