Are the refugee contractors and their friends in
Congress preparing to end-run the President on refugee cap? By Ann
Corcoran, 9/18/18.
Hopefully, Mike Pompeo’s legal team will be on the look-out for any attempt by the contractors and their lobbyists to use the appropriations process to usurp the President’s authority!
I reported this morning that
the Refugee Council USA
(RCUSA), the lobbying
arm of the refugee industry, was sounding pretty cocky about going for their
75,000 refugee cap for Fiscal Year 2019 which begins less than two weeks from
now in spite of the President’s proposed 30,000 cap.
It
is abundantly clear that the President has the power to set the cap (aka
ceiling) under the Refugee Act of 1980.
(Indeed,
it is also the case that there is no requirement in the law to admit any
refugees.)
So what might make the contractors and their lobbyists make what sounds
like a threatening statement: We still have
the desire, capacity, and resources to welcome at least 75,000 refugees to the
United States in the coming year. And we will spend every waking
moment looking for ways to do just that…
Admittedly
they are desperate because they stand to lose millions of federal dollars
if fewer refugees are admitted.
Yikes!
Appropriations???
Could they be planning to get a friendly Senator or Congressman to use
the upcoming Appropriations process and plant language in the State Department
funding bill that would direct the President to bring in 75,000 refugees?
The
strategy may be to use that upcoming State Department Appropriations Act to override the President’s
determination under the Refugee
Act. For this to
occur properly, Congress would likely have to include in the Appropriations Act
a specific line item of funding for 75,000 refugees accompanied by a statement
that the funding was being provided despite the provisions of the Refugee Act. In other words, the Appropriations
language would supersede existing law!
For
more on the legal principles involved, take a look at page 2-67 of Principles of Federal
Appropriations Law
published by the Government Accountability Office.
When
you have a look at the legal principles, based on a Supreme Court decision,
note that if they think they can do it with simple report language they are
mistaken. It must be actually language in the bill itself.
(But can we trust a legal team
that might be comprised of Obama leftovers to find the sleeper provision in
time?)
We
will be watching! If the contractors, who have millions of dollars at stake,
and their Democrat pals pull off a dirty trick like this, it is just one more
example of why American citizens are so sick of Washington and why we elected
Donald Trump. Where are you Stephen Miller?
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody
GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment