No More Suburbs or Cars

Obama Has Begun to Systematically Depopulate and Deindustrialize the Suburbs

Posted on August 25, 2014 Written by Dave Hodges, The Common Sense Show

If you live in the sub­urbs, you might be wise to advise your chil­dren on how to live, work and sur­vive in America’s inner cities because that is where they are likely to be liv­ing in the near future in a War­saw ghetto type of scenario.

The mass migra­tion from the sub­urbs back into densely pop­u­lated urban areas is not a next week thing, or a next month thing or even next year propo­si­tion, but the ground­work is hap­pen­ing right now. If you are not a Baby Boomer, you will not likely be retir­ing in the suburbs.

In Part One of this series, I detailed how the Chi­nese are forcibly relo­cat­ing one mil­lion Chi­nese per month to the mega-cities that have been dubbed the “ghost cities”  Obama will not rest until he has removed every man, woman and child from sub­ur­ban areas in the United States.

Obama’s Front Man for Sub­ur­ban Depopulation - The real brains behind the com­ing Agenda 21-inspired mass migra­tion from the sub­urbs to the inner cities is Mike Krulig and his new group of com­mu­nity advis­ers, Build­ing One Amer­ica. Most of you have never heard of Krulig or Build­ing One Amer­ica and there is a good rea­son for their anonymity. If a major­ity of the Amer­i­can peo­ple ever dis­cov­ered Krulig’s true inten­tions for sub­ur­ban dwelling Amer­i­cans, they would chase him down the street and string him and his peo­ple up from the near­est light poles.

The secre­tive agenda of Build­ing One Amer­ica has been mostly achieved by Obama’s appoint­ment of like-minded com­mu­nity activists to his staff. In fact, Krulig was one of Obama’s orig­i­nal com­mu­nity orga­niz­ing men­tors from the President’s Chicago South­side days. The word stealth applies because of a damn­ing photo depict­ing Krulig and Obama meet­ing at the White­house in 2011 and it was sub­se­quently pub­lished on the Build­ing One Amer­ica web­site (Photo left). How­ever, this type of pub­lic­ity would not have been good for the swing vot­ers liv­ing in America’s sub­urbs in the 2012 elec­tion. Obama’s peo­ple had the video scrubbed as well as the search engine links. How­ever, the Bre­it­bart peo­ple retained a copy of the pic­ture. This begs the ques­tion, if the Build­ing One Amer­ica plan is so good for Amer­ica, then why would the Obama peo­ple con­ceal his affil­i­a­tion with Krulig and his group of Agenda 21 social engineers?

Kruglik’s Agenda 21 Build­ing One Amer­ica group pro­poses the cre­ation of a regional tax-base shar­ing rev­enues in which sub­ur­ban tax money is directly redis­trib­uted to nearby cities and eco­nom­i­cally depressed con­cen­tric zones of inner-ring sub­urbs. Build­ing One Amer­ica also seeks to move the poor out of cities by impos­ing manda­tory low-income-housing quo­tas for middle-class sub­ur­ban devel­op­ments. Here are the plans of the Build­ing One Amer­ica pro­po­nents (e.g. Senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett).

Krulig’s group also seeks to export the con­tro­ver­sial regional tax-base shar­ing scheme cur­rently in place in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area to the rest of the coun­try. Under this pro­gram, a por­tion of sub­ur­ban tax money flows into a com­mon regional pot, which is then effec­tively redis­trib­uted to urban, and a few less well-off “inner-ring” sub­ur­ban, munic­i­pal­i­ties. The Minneapolis-St. Paul area regional gov­ern­ment is run by unelected and unac­count­able bureau­crats (i.e. Com­mis­sars) who are out of con­trol. It is crit­i­cal to know that remov­ing the elec­tion process from this Agenda 21, wealth redis­tri­b­u­tion endeavor was delib­er­ate for rea­sons that will become obvi­ous, as the reader will discover.

Don’t Get Too Attached To Your Car. The VMT will get Amer­ica out of their cars and into the inner city. Kruglik’s group also favors a vari­ety of poli­cies designed to force peo­ple out of their cars and force sub­ur­ban­ites, robbed of their own tax money, to relo­cate into densely pop­u­lated stack and pack cities.

Among Kruglick’s strate­gies to sep­a­rate peo­ple from their cars is the Vehi­cle Mileage Tax (VMT). Road pric­ing for the VMT would be imple­mented to force dri­vers out their cars. This will impact all dri­vers except for the Obama inspired exemp­tion of low income drivers.

The VMT is designed to give favored sta­tus to cer­tain groups. These groups rep­re­sent orga­ni­za­tions that want to trans­fer wealth through the heavy hand of regional gov­ern­ment inter­fer­ing in the hous­ing, trans­porta­tion and land use mar­ket place.

One Bay Area is San Francisco’s ver­sion of Build­ing One America - This tyranny is also being beta tested in the (San Fran­cisco) Bay area in a project enti­tled One Bay Area Plan. One Bay Area Plan is a 25 year plan which com­bines hous­ing, trans­porta­tion, and Agenda 21 land use poli­cies. The pub­lic cover story is that the project is designed to save the planet by reduc­ing Green House Gasses. The gen­er­ated rev­enue, esti­mated at $15 mil­lion per day, would be used to fund fur­ther Agenda 21 trans­porta­tion schemes such as buses, trol­lies and light rail in which only a few peo­ple presently ride. And speak­ing of light rail, I live in Ari­zona. Ari­zona has the worst funded schools, men­tal health and med­ical care sys­tem in the coun­try. Yet, that has not stopped the politi­cians from spend­ing almost $2 bil­lion dol­lars to build a light rail sys­tem in down­town Phoenix which only encom­passes a few miles of usable track in either direc­tion from down­town. And to make bad mat­ters worse, Ari­zona has approved build­ing an even more expen­sive light rail sys­tem which will con­nect Phoenix with Tuc­son and this sys­tem will even­tu­ally expand to San Diego and Albuquerque.

Your future home, the micro-apartment.

This plan also calls for Up-zon­ing which would expand the plan to even more areas in the Bay. This would mean even more require­ments for high den­sity hous­ing in cities that do not have their “fair share” of low income peo­ple. This will result in more 200 square foot apart­ments being con­structed near pub­lic tran­sit lines. It should be noted that Mayor Bloomberg is doing some­thing very sim­i­lar in New York City in which the con­struc­tion of any new apart­ment unit over 500 square feet is being for­bid­den in select neighborhoods.

This Bay Area Agenda 21 plan also con­tains a con­cept referred to as the Com­mu­ni­ties of Con­cern (i.e. low income and com­mu­ni­ties of color) would receive funds from these wind­fall prof­its that the region would receive. It appears to many as if Obama is try­ing to pro­voke a race war. Addi­tion­ally, devel­op­ment fees would be elim­i­nated for afford­able hous­ing devel­op­ments, while sub­si­dies would be used for favored activ­i­ties such as the cre­ation of more micro apart­ments and the con­struc­tion of low income hous­ing in the suburbs.

“Man­hat­taniz­ing America” - The Agenda 21 pro­po­nents are so brazen that the exis­tence of this scheme has even become part of the main­stream news. The fol­low­ing video con­tains a Fox News report on the very urban man­age­ment prin­ci­ples described in the pre­vi­ous paragraphs.

Con­clu­sion - On one hand, at least Amer­i­cans are not expe­ri­enc­ing forced relo­ca­tion to the “stack and packs” as we see China doing. Yet, Obama’s Build­ing One America’s tax plans are begin­ning to have a sim­i­lar effect.

Despite the omnipresent evi­dence that fed­eral relo­ca­tion tax poli­cies are in place and spread­ing across the coun­try, most peo­ple mis­tak­enly believe that the real­ity of the megac­i­ties con­cept in which we are all herded into the stack and pack cities is decades down the road. On the con­trary, as you have seen, the pro­gram is being beta tested in two large met­ro­pol­i­tan areas and many of Build­ing One America’s col­lec­tivist city man­age­ment prin­ci­ples are presently being imple­mented right beneath our noses. As long as Amer­i­cans pay their taxes and abide by some rea­son­able com­mu­nity stan­dards, shouldn’t we all be free to live where we choose? Most rea­son­able peo­ple would answer yes; we should be free to choose where we live. How­ever, this is not in the Obama agenda. As will be revealed in sub­se­quent parts of this series, Obama was made Pres­i­dent to usher in cap and trade and the dein­dus­tri­al­iza­tion of the United States. Amer­ica is truly learn­ing the mean­ing of fun­da­men­tally trans­form­ing Amer­ica and unless we are able to wake up our fel­low cit­i­zens, things are about to get a whole lot worse.

There is a much more to this dire and unfold­ing sce­nario. It is becom­ing clear that the glob­al­ists are plan­ning to dra­mat­i­cally and rapidly depop­u­late an entire region of the coun­try which will impact tens of mil­lions of peo­ple. The depop­u­la­tion of the bread­bas­ket of Amer­ica, the rural areas, is well under way and that is the topic of the next part in this series.

Related Posts

• United Nations – Agenda 21 – Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment and the Regional One Bay Area Plan
• Region­al­ism: Obama’s Quiet Anti-Suburban Revolution
• Turn­ing the Twin Cities into Sim City
• Agenda 21: Home Sweet Home in Freight Ship­ping Containers
• Urban devel­op­ment: mixed use, mixed results?
   
  Source: http://agenda21news.com/2014/08/obama-begun-systematically-depopulate-deindustrialize-suburbs/#more-2512
  Comments
  If voters can get their local elected officials to dump this anti-freedom agenda, it can be stopped.  If voters don’t accomplish this, they will be responsible for the end of the US Constitution and the coming tyranny.  State laws allowing Regionalism and unelected governance are already in place and need to be repealed.  In Georgia, HR 1216 and HR 277 need to be repealed.
  Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader