'This is a line we must draw and one we cannot and will not
cross' Thousands of signers of a new marriage
pledge, including leaders of Christian organizations representing millions, are
warning the justices on the U.S. Supreme Court to leave marriage alone.
No “redefinition.” No “gay marriage.” No nothing.
“We will view any decision by the
Supreme Court [overturning traditional marriage] or any court the same way
history views the Dred Scott and Buck v. Bell decisions. Our highest respect
for the rule of law requires that we not respect an unjust law that directly
conflicts with higher law,” says a Marriage
Pledge that was assembled by Keith
Fournier, a Catholic deacon who is editor of Catholic Online, and Mat Staver,
founder of Liberty Counsel.
“A decision purporting to redefine marriage flies in the
face of the Constitution and is contrary to the natural created order. As
people of faith we pledge obedience to our Creator when the state directly
conflicts with higher law.
“We respectfully warn the Supreme Court not to cross this
line.”
The justices are scheduled on Tuesday to hear arguments in a
case that was elevated from the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. That
decision said that residents of states have the right to define marriage for themselves,
and the judges would not do it.
But that flies in the face of the pro-homosexual activism
that has enveloped America over recent years, and even the agenda pursued by
Barack Obama in the White House, given his pursuit of open homosexuality in the
U.S. military and more.
“We stand united together in defense of marriage,” the
pledge states
“Make no mistake about our resolve. While there are many
things we can endure, redefining marriage is so fundamental to the natural
order and the common good that this is a line we must draw and one we cannot
and will not cross.”
The warning to classify an adverse decision regarding
marriage along with Dred Scott and Buck brings to the fore of the argument the
fact that the Supreme Court has, in fact, released decisions in the past that
properly horrify contemporary Americans.
In Dred Scott, an earlier generation of justices found
“blacks are inferior human beings.” And in Buck, the ruling allowed forced
government sterilization of specific individuals because “three generations of
imbeciles are enough.”
Thousands of Americans have signed onto the pledge,
including those with considerable followings, such as Franklin Graham of
Samaritan’s Purse, Gov. Mike Huckabee, James Dobson of Family Talk Action, Sen.
Rick Santorum, Father Frank Pavone of Priests for Life, Penny Nance of
Concerned Women for America. Rich Bott of Bott Radio Network, Jonathan Cahn,
author of “The Harbinger,” Don Wildmon of American Family Association, Richard
Land of the Southern Evangelical Seminary, Judson Phillips of Tea Party Nation,
and more.
Some of the leaders’ constituencies can be numbered in the
hundreds of thousands or even millions.
“We stand together in defense of marriage and the family and
society founded upon them. While we come from a variety of communities and hold
differing faith perspectives, we are united in our common affirmation of
marriage.
“On the matter of marriage, we stand in solidarity. We
affirm that marriage and family have been inscribed by the Divine Architect
into the order of Creation. Marriage is ontologically between one man and one
woman, ordered toward the union of the spouses, open to children and formative
of family. Family is the first vital cell of society, the first government, and
the first mediating institution of our social order. The future of a free and
healthy society passes through marriage and the family.
“Marriage as existing solely between one man and one woman
precedes civil government. Though affirmed, fulfilled, and elevated by faith,
the truth that marriage can exist only between one man and one woman is not
based on religion or revelation alone, but on the Natural Law, written on the
human heart and discernible through the exercise of reason. It is part of the
natural created order. The Natural Law is what Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.,
referred to as a higher law or a just law in his famous Letter from Birmingham
Jail.
“Marriage is the preeminent and the most fundamental of all
human social institutions. Civil institutions do not create marriage nor can
they manufacture a right to marry for those who are incapable of marriage.
Society begins with marriage and the family.
“We pledge to stand together to defend marriage for what it
is, a bond between one man and one woman, intended for life, and open to the
gift of children.”
Co-author
Mat Staver wrote at Stream.org that, “I argued that
a bad court decision might require civil disobedience. I still pray that won’t
be necessary. I pray the Supreme Court will allow states to recognize natural
marriage. That would be a great victory for truth, but it would not end the
fight. Neither the Supreme Court nor any state has the authority to redefine
the natural created order of marriage. Marriage is no more a state’s rights
issue than is slavery or the law of gravity.”
“This is the redline we will not cross,” Staver wrote.
“While no one wants this conflict, we have no choice but to resist an unjust
law, particularly one that will force us to participate in acts that directly
conflict with the Natural and Revealed Law.”
He continued, “How will peaceful resistance be manifested?
In many different ways depending on our individual circumstances; but in every
case, it should be peaceful and
it should be resistance. For
example, if a state commands a Christian adoption ministry to ignore the
difference between a same-sex couple and a married husband and wife for
purposes of adoption, the ministry should not comply and should not close its doors. It should not
abandon its God-given call and mission to place children in homes with a mother
and a father. Only in this way will the full truth of the conflict be seen.
Only in this way will the naked injustice of the state’s coercive power be
exposed.”
About two-thirds of the states already formalize “gay
marriage,” and the Supreme Court decision is expected to nationalize whatever
opinion is released. Most of the states that do recognize the status have been
ordered by individual federal judges to allow for “gay weddings.”
In one state, Alabama, the state Supreme Court justices
noted that they had as much power to interpret the Constitution as the federal
judiciary and forbade their state officials from following the order of Judge
Callie Granade.
The Alabama justices noted that the Supreme Court already
ruled, just over a year ago, that decisions about regulating marriage belong to
the states.
Other commentators have suggested it might be time for
“pitchforks and torches” over the issue, and several judges forced out of
office because of orders they conduct same-sex “marriages” are suing their
state for violating their religious rights.
The attacks on Christian business owners by homosexuals who
demand they violate their faith to provide various services already is in full
swing across the U.S.
WND
has compiled a “Big List of Christian Coercion” with dozens of cases in which Christians have been fined,
threatened or penalized for recognizing the biblical definition of marriage.
WND
reported longtime conservative leader Pat
Buchanan urged Christians to fight the “LGBT fanatics” who are demanding they
betray their faith, even if it means civil disobedience.
In an interview with WND, Buchanan,
the author of “Suicide
of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?” and other bestsellers, spoke on the controversy.
Buchanan
forcefully condemned defeatism among social conservatives and rejected retreat
or even compromise. Instead, the one-time presidential contender and Reagan White
House aide urged Christians to put the laws of God above the laws of man.
“This
battle can be won, but it cannot be won if we do not stand our ground and fight
against this moral onslaught from the left,” he said. “The hill to stand on and
fight on is the God-given natural right and the constitutional principle that
people of faith may choose not to associate with those whose actions are
abhorrent and whose lifestyle is insulting and offensive to that faith.”
Buchanan dismissed arguments that “gay”-rights activists are
simply asking for political freedom or the same rights as any other citizen.
“The LGBT militants are not asking to be left alone,” he
said. “They are demanding that we accept the morality of homosexuality and
same-sex marriages, and manifest that acceptance, under pain of law and
sanctions, in our daily lives.”
Buchanan added: “As the Romans demanded of the Christians,
the LGBT fanatics want us to burn incense to their gods. The answer is no. If
it comes to civil disobedience, so be it.”
WND also reported a team of prominent Christian leaders worked on a statement
to inform the public – including justices on the U.S. Supreme Court who soon
will hear arguments on the issue – that they will engage in civil disobedience
rather than follow a ruling that establishes homosexual marriage in the United
States.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/supreme-court-justices-warned-to-leave-marriage-alone/
Comments
Defining Marriage is not included in the
enumerated powers granted by the States to the Federal, outlined in the US
Constitution. The Supreme Court is
constitutionally restricted to publish opinions within the confines of the
enumerated powers. All other matters are
determined by the States and the People.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment